Denise Head, Hannah Maybrier, Marta Stojanovic, Taylor F Levine, Cheyenne Parson
{"title":"了解返程:年轻人和老年人返程的决定因素。","authors":"Denise Head, Hannah Maybrier, Marta Stojanovic, Taylor F Levine, Cheyenne Parson","doi":"10.1037/pag0000886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Route retracing (i.e., returning to your start location) is critical for successful navigation in everyday life. While age-related impairment in traversing a route from a start location to target destination has been well-established, age differences in the ability to reverse a previously learned path has been less examined. Previous work found that studying a map facilitates better route retracing for older adults than studying a route from an egocentric perspective during initial learning. However, the mechanism for this benefit is unclear. This study examined whether facilitating allocentric representation, egocentric perspective taking, or temporal sequencing would benefit route retracing performance in younger (<i>n</i> = 69; aged 18-36) and older (<i>n</i> = 70; aged 61-85) adults. In addition, the role of individual differences in allocentric representation development, egocentric perspective taking, temporal sequencing, procedural learning, as well as hippocampal and caudate volume in route performance was examined. Older adults benefited from developing an allocentric representation of the environment and simultaneous exposure to landmark temporal order when reversing a route but did not show a benefit from minimizing demands on egocentric perspective taking. Both cognitive map formation and egocentric perspective taking tasks were each more strongly associated with route retracing than route repetition across age groups. Results suggest that older adults may benefit from specific strategies to develop and retain a flexible environmental representation, which would allow for successful route retracing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":" ","pages":"537-557"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12289427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the return journey: Determinants of route retracing in younger and older adults.\",\"authors\":\"Denise Head, Hannah Maybrier, Marta Stojanovic, Taylor F Levine, Cheyenne Parson\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pag0000886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Route retracing (i.e., returning to your start location) is critical for successful navigation in everyday life. While age-related impairment in traversing a route from a start location to target destination has been well-established, age differences in the ability to reverse a previously learned path has been less examined. Previous work found that studying a map facilitates better route retracing for older adults than studying a route from an egocentric perspective during initial learning. However, the mechanism for this benefit is unclear. This study examined whether facilitating allocentric representation, egocentric perspective taking, or temporal sequencing would benefit route retracing performance in younger (<i>n</i> = 69; aged 18-36) and older (<i>n</i> = 70; aged 61-85) adults. In addition, the role of individual differences in allocentric representation development, egocentric perspective taking, temporal sequencing, procedural learning, as well as hippocampal and caudate volume in route performance was examined. Older adults benefited from developing an allocentric representation of the environment and simultaneous exposure to landmark temporal order when reversing a route but did not show a benefit from minimizing demands on egocentric perspective taking. Both cognitive map formation and egocentric perspective taking tasks were each more strongly associated with route retracing than route repetition across age groups. Results suggest that older adults may benefit from specific strategies to develop and retain a flexible environmental representation, which would allow for successful route retracing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology and Aging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"537-557\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12289427/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology and Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000886\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000886","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在日常生活中,路线回溯(即返回到起始位置)对于成功导航至关重要。虽然从起始位置到目标目的地穿越路线的年龄相关损伤已经得到证实,但年龄差异在逆转先前学习路径的能力方面的研究却很少。先前的研究发现,在最初的学习过程中,学习地图比从自我中心的角度学习路线更有利于老年人的路线回溯。然而,这种益处的机制尚不清楚。本研究考察了促进非中心表征、自我中心视角或时间排序是否会有利于年轻人的路线回溯表现(n = 69;年龄18-36岁)及以上(n = 70;年龄61-85岁)成人。此外,研究还考察了个体差异在异中心表征发展、自我中心视角采取、时间排序、程序学习以及海马和尾状体体积在路线表现中的作用。老年人从发展对环境的非中心表征和在逆转路线时同时暴露于具有里程碑意义的时间顺序中受益,但从最小化自我中心视角的要求中没有显示出益处。在不同年龄组中,认知地图形成和自我中心视角任务与路线回溯的关系比路线重复的关系更强。结果表明,老年人可能受益于特定的策略,以发展和保持灵活的环境表现,这将允许成功的路线回溯。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Understanding the return journey: Determinants of route retracing in younger and older adults.
Route retracing (i.e., returning to your start location) is critical for successful navigation in everyday life. While age-related impairment in traversing a route from a start location to target destination has been well-established, age differences in the ability to reverse a previously learned path has been less examined. Previous work found that studying a map facilitates better route retracing for older adults than studying a route from an egocentric perspective during initial learning. However, the mechanism for this benefit is unclear. This study examined whether facilitating allocentric representation, egocentric perspective taking, or temporal sequencing would benefit route retracing performance in younger (n = 69; aged 18-36) and older (n = 70; aged 61-85) adults. In addition, the role of individual differences in allocentric representation development, egocentric perspective taking, temporal sequencing, procedural learning, as well as hippocampal and caudate volume in route performance was examined. Older adults benefited from developing an allocentric representation of the environment and simultaneous exposure to landmark temporal order when reversing a route but did not show a benefit from minimizing demands on egocentric perspective taking. Both cognitive map formation and egocentric perspective taking tasks were each more strongly associated with route retracing than route repetition across age groups. Results suggest that older adults may benefit from specific strategies to develop and retain a flexible environmental representation, which would allow for successful route retracing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Psychology and Aging publishes original articles on adult development and aging. Such original articles include reports of research that may be applied, biobehavioral, clinical, educational, experimental (laboratory, field, or naturalistic studies), methodological, or psychosocial. Although the emphasis is on original research investigations, occasional theoretical analyses of research issues, practical clinical problems, or policy may appear, as well as critical reviews of a content area in adult development and aging. Clinical case studies that have theoretical significance are also appropriate. Brief reports are acceptable with the author"s agreement not to submit a full report to another journal.