脉冲灌洗和电场去除钴铬表面生物膜的体外研究。

IF 1.6 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Bioelectricity Pub Date : 2025-03-18 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1089/bioe.2024.0027
Martí Bernaus, Yuly López, Sara M Soto, Adrián Bermúdez-Castel, Jose Antonio Calero, Diego Torres, Margarita Veloso, Lluis Font-Vizcarra
{"title":"脉冲灌洗和电场去除钴铬表面生物膜的体外研究。","authors":"Martí Bernaus, Yuly López, Sara M Soto, Adrián Bermúdez-Castel, Jose Antonio Calero, Diego Torres, Margarita Veloso, Lluis Font-Vizcarra","doi":"10.1089/bioe.2024.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With the increased use of metallic devices in medical disciplines, the number of potential complications has also risen. Orthopedic implant-related infections are a serious complication often requiring a combination of surgical and prolonged antibiotic treatment. Biofilms play an important role in implant-related infections, and many different strategies have been studied to remove it. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of electrical fields and pulse lavage to remove <i>S. epidermidis</i> biofilm from metallic surfaces used in joint arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared five different models and combination treatments in an <i>in vitro</i> scenario to remove the biofilm. Five different models were compared with a model without treatment (control): (a) low-pressure pulse lavage, (b) high-pressure pulse lavage, (c) pulsed electrical fields, (d) low-pressure pulse lavage in combination with pulsed electrical fields, and (e) high-pressure pulse lavage in combination with pulsed electrical fields. Electrical fields were applied using 25 pulses at 15 V. Each pulse lasted 0.1 s and was applied every 0.5 s for a total exposure time of 12.5 s. The exposure time for irrigation was set at 25 s.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most effective model for removing biofilm from cobalt-chrome surfaces was a combination of high-pressure pulse lavage and electrical fields.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study results suggest the use of pulsed electrical fields is effective at removing biofilm and that our tested conditions could be translated to a clinical scenario involving infected medical devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":29923,"journal":{"name":"Bioelectricity","volume":"7 1","pages":"71-75"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12054610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulse Lavage and Electrical Fields to Remove Biofilms from Cobalt-Chrome Surfaces: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.\",\"authors\":\"Martí Bernaus, Yuly López, Sara M Soto, Adrián Bermúdez-Castel, Jose Antonio Calero, Diego Torres, Margarita Veloso, Lluis Font-Vizcarra\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/bioe.2024.0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With the increased use of metallic devices in medical disciplines, the number of potential complications has also risen. Orthopedic implant-related infections are a serious complication often requiring a combination of surgical and prolonged antibiotic treatment. Biofilms play an important role in implant-related infections, and many different strategies have been studied to remove it. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of electrical fields and pulse lavage to remove <i>S. epidermidis</i> biofilm from metallic surfaces used in joint arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared five different models and combination treatments in an <i>in vitro</i> scenario to remove the biofilm. Five different models were compared with a model without treatment (control): (a) low-pressure pulse lavage, (b) high-pressure pulse lavage, (c) pulsed electrical fields, (d) low-pressure pulse lavage in combination with pulsed electrical fields, and (e) high-pressure pulse lavage in combination with pulsed electrical fields. Electrical fields were applied using 25 pulses at 15 V. Each pulse lasted 0.1 s and was applied every 0.5 s for a total exposure time of 12.5 s. The exposure time for irrigation was set at 25 s.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most effective model for removing biofilm from cobalt-chrome surfaces was a combination of high-pressure pulse lavage and electrical fields.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study results suggest the use of pulsed electrical fields is effective at removing biofilm and that our tested conditions could be translated to a clinical scenario involving infected medical devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioelectricity\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"71-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12054610/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioelectricity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/bioe.2024.0027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioelectricity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/bioe.2024.0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导语:随着医学学科中金属器械的使用越来越多,潜在并发症的数量也在增加。骨科植入物相关感染是一种严重的并发症,通常需要手术和长期抗生素治疗相结合。生物膜在植入物相关感染中起着重要作用,已经研究了许多不同的策略来去除它。本研究的目的是评估电场和脉冲灌洗去除关节置换术中金属表面表皮葡萄球菌生物膜的有效性。方法:比较5种不同的模型和联合处理在体外去除生物膜的效果。将5种不同的模型与未经处理的模型(对照组)进行比较:(a)低压脉冲灌洗,(b)高压脉冲灌洗,(c)脉冲电场,(d)低压脉冲灌洗联合脉冲电场,(e)高压脉冲灌洗联合脉冲电场。使用25个15v脉冲施加电场。每个脉冲持续0.1 s,每0.5 s施加一次,总曝光时间12.5 s。冲洗暴露时间设定为25 s。结果:高压脉冲灌洗与电场结合是去除钴铬表面生物膜最有效的模式。结论:我们的研究结果表明,脉冲电场在去除生物膜方面是有效的,我们的测试条件可以转化为涉及感染医疗设备的临床场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pulse Lavage and Electrical Fields to Remove Biofilms from Cobalt-Chrome Surfaces: An In Vitro Study.

Introduction: With the increased use of metallic devices in medical disciplines, the number of potential complications has also risen. Orthopedic implant-related infections are a serious complication often requiring a combination of surgical and prolonged antibiotic treatment. Biofilms play an important role in implant-related infections, and many different strategies have been studied to remove it. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of electrical fields and pulse lavage to remove S. epidermidis biofilm from metallic surfaces used in joint arthroplasty.

Methods: We compared five different models and combination treatments in an in vitro scenario to remove the biofilm. Five different models were compared with a model without treatment (control): (a) low-pressure pulse lavage, (b) high-pressure pulse lavage, (c) pulsed electrical fields, (d) low-pressure pulse lavage in combination with pulsed electrical fields, and (e) high-pressure pulse lavage in combination with pulsed electrical fields. Electrical fields were applied using 25 pulses at 15 V. Each pulse lasted 0.1 s and was applied every 0.5 s for a total exposure time of 12.5 s. The exposure time for irrigation was set at 25 s.

Results: The most effective model for removing biofilm from cobalt-chrome surfaces was a combination of high-pressure pulse lavage and electrical fields.

Conclusion: Our study results suggest the use of pulsed electrical fields is effective at removing biofilm and that our tested conditions could be translated to a clinical scenario involving infected medical devices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bioelectricity
Bioelectricity Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信