Märit Martha Müller, Sebastian Hahnel, Angelika Rauch, Martin Rosentritt
{"title":"表面处理和玻璃陶瓷涂层对不同类型氧化锆及其拮抗剂磨损行为的影响。","authors":"Märit Martha Müller, Sebastian Hahnel, Angelika Rauch, Martin Rosentritt","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b6184321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This in-vitro study aimed to investigate the influence of different pretreatments and surface coatings on the wear of different zirconia and their antagonists.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>Zirconia specimens (3-, 4- and 5-mol% yttria tetragonal zirconia; n = 160/material) were subjected to pretreatment (airborne-particle abrasion, 50 µm Al2O3, 1 bar; 120 µm Al2O3, 3 bar; polishing) and surface coating (spray glazing, micro-layering, layering, veneering). References comprised no pretreatment or coating. Wear tests were performed (50 N, 120,000 cycles). Wear (mean, maximum, antagonist) and arithmetic mean roughness Ra and average roughness depth Rz were determined. ANOVA, Bonferroni, and Pearson correlation (α = .05) were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ra/Rz showed significant (P < .001) differences (Ra: 0.01 ± 0.01 µm to 0.71 ± 0.06 µm; Rz: 0.31 ± 0.09 µm to 4.33 ± 0.44 µm). Two groups could be distinguished by mean and maximum wear with significant (P < .001) differences: (1) glaze sprayed and without coating (mean wear: 9.4 ± 2.6 µm to 57 ± 21.3 µm, max. wear: 24.1 ± 6.9 µm to 125.4 ± 18.2 µm) and (2) all coating procedures (mean wear: 129.2 ± 22.8 µm to 236.5 ± 62.0 µm; max. wear: 188.7 ± 21.4 µm to 444.2 ± 110.6 µm). Antagonist wear (9.2 ± 4.5 to 29.7 ± 5.0%) showed a significant (P < .001) correlation to surface coating, mean and maximum wear, and Ra and Rz. Mean wear significantly (P < .001) correlated with surface coating, maximum wear, and antagonist wear.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Under clinical conditions, layering or veneering can lead to increased wear of the restoration, but in return reduce the abrasion of antagonists. Excessively rough surface treatments should be avoided, as they might increase antagonist wear.</p>","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":"0 0","pages":"432-441"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of surface treatment and glass-ceramic coating on the wear behavior of different types of zirconia and their antagonists.\",\"authors\":\"Märit Martha Müller, Sebastian Hahnel, Angelika Rauch, Martin Rosentritt\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.qi.b6184321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This in-vitro study aimed to investigate the influence of different pretreatments and surface coatings on the wear of different zirconia and their antagonists.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>Zirconia specimens (3-, 4- and 5-mol% yttria tetragonal zirconia; n = 160/material) were subjected to pretreatment (airborne-particle abrasion, 50 µm Al2O3, 1 bar; 120 µm Al2O3, 3 bar; polishing) and surface coating (spray glazing, micro-layering, layering, veneering). References comprised no pretreatment or coating. Wear tests were performed (50 N, 120,000 cycles). Wear (mean, maximum, antagonist) and arithmetic mean roughness Ra and average roughness depth Rz were determined. ANOVA, Bonferroni, and Pearson correlation (α = .05) were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ra/Rz showed significant (P < .001) differences (Ra: 0.01 ± 0.01 µm to 0.71 ± 0.06 µm; Rz: 0.31 ± 0.09 µm to 4.33 ± 0.44 µm). Two groups could be distinguished by mean and maximum wear with significant (P < .001) differences: (1) glaze sprayed and without coating (mean wear: 9.4 ± 2.6 µm to 57 ± 21.3 µm, max. wear: 24.1 ± 6.9 µm to 125.4 ± 18.2 µm) and (2) all coating procedures (mean wear: 129.2 ± 22.8 µm to 236.5 ± 62.0 µm; max. wear: 188.7 ± 21.4 µm to 444.2 ± 110.6 µm). Antagonist wear (9.2 ± 4.5 to 29.7 ± 5.0%) showed a significant (P < .001) correlation to surface coating, mean and maximum wear, and Ra and Rz. Mean wear significantly (P < .001) correlated with surface coating, maximum wear, and antagonist wear.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Under clinical conditions, layering or veneering can lead to increased wear of the restoration, but in return reduce the abrasion of antagonists. Excessively rough surface treatments should be avoided, as they might increase antagonist wear.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quintessence international\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"432-441\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quintessence international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b6184321\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b6184321","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effect of surface treatment and glass-ceramic coating on the wear behavior of different types of zirconia and their antagonists.
Objectives: This in-vitro study aimed to investigate the influence of different pretreatments and surface coatings on the wear of different zirconia and their antagonists.
Method and materials: Zirconia specimens (3-, 4- and 5-mol% yttria tetragonal zirconia; n = 160/material) were subjected to pretreatment (airborne-particle abrasion, 50 µm Al2O3, 1 bar; 120 µm Al2O3, 3 bar; polishing) and surface coating (spray glazing, micro-layering, layering, veneering). References comprised no pretreatment or coating. Wear tests were performed (50 N, 120,000 cycles). Wear (mean, maximum, antagonist) and arithmetic mean roughness Ra and average roughness depth Rz were determined. ANOVA, Bonferroni, and Pearson correlation (α = .05) were performed.
Results: Ra/Rz showed significant (P < .001) differences (Ra: 0.01 ± 0.01 µm to 0.71 ± 0.06 µm; Rz: 0.31 ± 0.09 µm to 4.33 ± 0.44 µm). Two groups could be distinguished by mean and maximum wear with significant (P < .001) differences: (1) glaze sprayed and without coating (mean wear: 9.4 ± 2.6 µm to 57 ± 21.3 µm, max. wear: 24.1 ± 6.9 µm to 125.4 ± 18.2 µm) and (2) all coating procedures (mean wear: 129.2 ± 22.8 µm to 236.5 ± 62.0 µm; max. wear: 188.7 ± 21.4 µm to 444.2 ± 110.6 µm). Antagonist wear (9.2 ± 4.5 to 29.7 ± 5.0%) showed a significant (P < .001) correlation to surface coating, mean and maximum wear, and Ra and Rz. Mean wear significantly (P < .001) correlated with surface coating, maximum wear, and antagonist wear.
Conclusion: Under clinical conditions, layering or veneering can lead to increased wear of the restoration, but in return reduce the abrasion of antagonists. Excessively rough surface treatments should be avoided, as they might increase antagonist wear.
期刊介绍:
QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.