多学科肿瘤治疗与肝移植后肝癌患者生存率的提高有关。

IF 2.6 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Li Zhang, Jian Yang, Jun-Jie Li, Chi-Yi Chen, Xiao-Dong Wang, Yan Xie, Wen-Tao Jiang
{"title":"多学科肿瘤治疗与肝移植后肝癌患者生存率的提高有关。","authors":"Li Zhang, Jian Yang, Jun-Jie Li, Chi-Yi Chen, Xiao-Dong Wang, Yan Xie, Wen-Tao Jiang","doi":"10.5306/wjco.v16.i4.100729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks as the sixth most common cancer and the third- leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The multidisciplinary tumor board (MDTB) has been recognized for improving outcomes in cancer management, but its role in patients with HCC undergoing liver transplantation (LT) remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the impact of an MDTB on survival outcomes in patients with HCC undergoing LT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 393 patients with HCC who underwent LT at our institution from October 2015 to October 2021. Patients were categorized into the MDTB and non-MDTB groups. We compared preoperative and postoperative characteristics, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) criteria, no significant differences in OS and DFS were noted between the MDTB and non-MDTB groups. However, for patients who exceeded the UCSF criteria, the MDTB group exhibited a substantial improvement in both OS and DFS. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rates for the MDTB group in this subgroup were 88.68%, 75.29%, and 61.78%, respectively, compared to 83.02%, 64.07%, and 38.25%, respectively in the non-MDTB group. Similarly, DFS rates were 89.47%, 71.35%, and 63.52%, respectively, <i>vs</i> 82.18%, 53.78%, and 34.04%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MDTB approach was particularly beneficial for patients with HCC exceeding the UCSF criteria, significantly improving OS and DFS. These findings advocate for integrating MDTB into clinical practice for optimizing the management of high-risk patients with HCC undergoing LT.</p>","PeriodicalId":23802,"journal":{"name":"World journal of clinical oncology","volume":"16 4","pages":"100729"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12019261/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multidisciplinary tumor board is associated with improved survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"Li Zhang, Jian Yang, Jun-Jie Li, Chi-Yi Chen, Xiao-Dong Wang, Yan Xie, Wen-Tao Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.5306/wjco.v16.i4.100729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks as the sixth most common cancer and the third- leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The multidisciplinary tumor board (MDTB) has been recognized for improving outcomes in cancer management, but its role in patients with HCC undergoing liver transplantation (LT) remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the impact of an MDTB on survival outcomes in patients with HCC undergoing LT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 393 patients with HCC who underwent LT at our institution from October 2015 to October 2021. Patients were categorized into the MDTB and non-MDTB groups. We compared preoperative and postoperative characteristics, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) criteria, no significant differences in OS and DFS were noted between the MDTB and non-MDTB groups. However, for patients who exceeded the UCSF criteria, the MDTB group exhibited a substantial improvement in both OS and DFS. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rates for the MDTB group in this subgroup were 88.68%, 75.29%, and 61.78%, respectively, compared to 83.02%, 64.07%, and 38.25%, respectively in the non-MDTB group. Similarly, DFS rates were 89.47%, 71.35%, and 63.52%, respectively, <i>vs</i> 82.18%, 53.78%, and 34.04%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MDTB approach was particularly beneficial for patients with HCC exceeding the UCSF criteria, significantly improving OS and DFS. These findings advocate for integrating MDTB into clinical practice for optimizing the management of high-risk patients with HCC undergoing LT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World journal of clinical oncology\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"100729\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12019261/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World journal of clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v16.i4.100729\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v16.i4.100729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肝细胞癌(HCC)是全球第六大常见癌症和第三大癌症相关死亡原因。多学科肿瘤委员会(MDTB)已被公认为改善癌症治疗的结果,但其在肝移植(LT) HCC患者中的作用仍未得到充分探讨。目的:评估耐多药结核对肝细胞癌行肝移植患者生存结局的影响。方法:我们回顾性分析了2015年10月至2021年10月在我院行肝细胞癌行肝移植的393例肝细胞癌患者。患者被分为耐多药结核病组和非耐多药结核病组。我们比较了两组患者的术前和术后特征、总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)。结果:在加州大学旧金山分校(UCSF)的标准中,MDTB组和非MDTB组之间的OS和DFS没有显着差异。然而,对于超过UCSF标准的患者,MDTB组在OS和DFS方面都有显着改善。该亚组中MDTB组的1年、3年和5年OS率分别为88.68%、75.29%和61.78%,而非MDTB组的OS率分别为83.02%、64.07%和38.25%。DFS分别为89.47%、71.35%、63.52%和82.18%、53.78%、34.04%。结论:对于超过UCSF标准的HCC患者,MDTB方法尤其有益,显著改善OS和DFS。这些发现提倡将MDTB纳入临床实践,以优化高危HCC患者行肝移植的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multidisciplinary tumor board is associated with improved survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks as the sixth most common cancer and the third- leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The multidisciplinary tumor board (MDTB) has been recognized for improving outcomes in cancer management, but its role in patients with HCC undergoing liver transplantation (LT) remains underexplored.

Aim: To evaluate the impact of an MDTB on survival outcomes in patients with HCC undergoing LT.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 393 patients with HCC who underwent LT at our institution from October 2015 to October 2021. Patients were categorized into the MDTB and non-MDTB groups. We compared preoperative and postoperative characteristics, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) between the two groups.

Results: Within the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) criteria, no significant differences in OS and DFS were noted between the MDTB and non-MDTB groups. However, for patients who exceeded the UCSF criteria, the MDTB group exhibited a substantial improvement in both OS and DFS. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rates for the MDTB group in this subgroup were 88.68%, 75.29%, and 61.78%, respectively, compared to 83.02%, 64.07%, and 38.25%, respectively in the non-MDTB group. Similarly, DFS rates were 89.47%, 71.35%, and 63.52%, respectively, vs 82.18%, 53.78%, and 34.04%, respectively.

Conclusion: The MDTB approach was particularly beneficial for patients with HCC exceeding the UCSF criteria, significantly improving OS and DFS. These findings advocate for integrating MDTB into clinical practice for optimizing the management of high-risk patients with HCC undergoing LT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
585
期刊介绍: The WJCO is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJCO is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of oncology. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJCO is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJCO are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in oncology. Scope: Art of Oncology, Biology of Neoplasia, Breast Cancer, Cancer Prevention and Control, Cancer-Related Complications, Diagnosis in Oncology, Gastrointestinal Cancer, Genetic Testing For Cancer, Gynecologic Cancer, Head and Neck Cancer, Hematologic Malignancy, Lung Cancer, Melanoma, Molecular Oncology, Neurooncology, Palliative and Supportive Care, Pediatric Oncology, Surgical Oncology, Translational Oncology, and Urologic Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信