低剂量挥发性麻醉剂对雷马唑仑麻醉术中神经生理监测的影响。

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Hee-Sun Park, Wonho Choi, Dong-Ho Lee, Yong Seo Koo, Se Keun Oh, Won Uk Koh
{"title":"低剂量挥发性麻醉剂对雷马唑仑麻醉术中神经生理监测的影响。","authors":"Hee-Sun Park, Wonho Choi, Dong-Ho Lee, Yong Seo Koo, Se Keun Oh, Won Uk Koh","doi":"10.4097/kja.24598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remimazolam is a novel short-acting benzodiazepine. We investigated the effects of low doses of volatile anesthetic agents on motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) during remimazolam-remifentanil anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-nine patients undergoing cervical spine surgery were randomly assigned to either the sevoflurane (n = 20) or desflurane (n = 19) groups. Volatile anesthetic agents were administered at 0.3, 0.6, and 0.8 minimum alveolar concentration (MACs) during remimazolam-remifentanil anesthesia. Significant changes were considered as more than 50% amplitude suppression and more than 10% latency increase from baseline values. The primary outcome was MEP amplitude change. Secondary outcomes included MEP latency, SSEP amplitude and latency, and group comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MEP amplitudes were slightly reduced at 0.3 MAC; however, a suppression of more than 50% from baseline values at 0.3 MAC, particularly in the upper limbs, was observed in a notable proportion of participants; 30.0% and 47.4% in the sevoflurane and desflurane groups, respectively. The corresponding percentages for the lower limbs were 15.0% and 15.8%, respectively. MEP amplitude suppression was more than 50% in the majority of participants at 0.6 and 0.8 MAC. No significant difference was observed between the groups. SSEPs exhibited no significant amplitude suppression or latency prolongation across all MAC levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Notable MEP amplitude suppression was observed in many patients when 0.3 MAC volatile anesthetics were used as adjuncts. Therefore, even low doses of volatile anesthetics must be added cautiously to remimazolam-based anesthesia to prevent confounding. The SSEPs were relatively preserved, regardless of MAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":17855,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of low-dose volatile anesthetics on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during anesthesia with remimazolam.\",\"authors\":\"Hee-Sun Park, Wonho Choi, Dong-Ho Lee, Yong Seo Koo, Se Keun Oh, Won Uk Koh\",\"doi\":\"10.4097/kja.24598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remimazolam is a novel short-acting benzodiazepine. We investigated the effects of low doses of volatile anesthetic agents on motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) during remimazolam-remifentanil anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-nine patients undergoing cervical spine surgery were randomly assigned to either the sevoflurane (n = 20) or desflurane (n = 19) groups. Volatile anesthetic agents were administered at 0.3, 0.6, and 0.8 minimum alveolar concentration (MACs) during remimazolam-remifentanil anesthesia. Significant changes were considered as more than 50% amplitude suppression and more than 10% latency increase from baseline values. The primary outcome was MEP amplitude change. Secondary outcomes included MEP latency, SSEP amplitude and latency, and group comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MEP amplitudes were slightly reduced at 0.3 MAC; however, a suppression of more than 50% from baseline values at 0.3 MAC, particularly in the upper limbs, was observed in a notable proportion of participants; 30.0% and 47.4% in the sevoflurane and desflurane groups, respectively. The corresponding percentages for the lower limbs were 15.0% and 15.8%, respectively. MEP amplitude suppression was more than 50% in the majority of participants at 0.6 and 0.8 MAC. No significant difference was observed between the groups. SSEPs exhibited no significant amplitude suppression or latency prolongation across all MAC levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Notable MEP amplitude suppression was observed in many patients when 0.3 MAC volatile anesthetics were used as adjuncts. Therefore, even low doses of volatile anesthetics must be added cautiously to remimazolam-based anesthesia to prevent confounding. The SSEPs were relatively preserved, regardless of MAC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.24598\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.24598","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:雷马唑仑是一种新型短效苯二氮卓类药物。我们研究了低剂量挥发性麻醉剂对雷马唑仑-瑞芬太尼麻醉过程中运动诱发电位(MEPs)和体感诱发电位(ssep)的影响。方法:39例颈椎手术患者随机分为七氟醚组(n = 20)和地氟醚组(n = 19)。在雷马唑仑-瑞芬太尼麻醉期间,以0.3、0.6和0.8的最低肺泡浓度给药。如果振幅抑制超过50%,潜伏期比基线值增加超过10%,则认为发生了显著变化。主要观察指标为MEP振幅变化。次要结局包括MEP潜伏期、SSEP振幅和潜伏期,以及组间比较。结果:0.3 MAC时MEP振幅略有下降;然而,在0.3 MAC时,显著比例的参与者,尤其是上肢,比基线值抑制了50%以上;七氟醚和地氟醚组分别为30.0%和47.4%。下肢相应比例分别为15.0%和15.8%。在0.6和0.8 MAC时,大多数参与者的MEP幅度抑制超过50%。两组之间没有显著差异。在所有MAC水平上,ssep均未表现出明显的幅度抑制或延迟延长。结论:使用0.3 MAC挥发性麻醉药辅助治疗时,许多患者的MEP幅度明显下降。因此,即使是低剂量的挥发性麻醉药也必须谨慎地加入以雷马唑仑为基础的麻醉,以防止混淆。与MAC无关,ssep相对保存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of low-dose volatile anesthetics on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during anesthesia with remimazolam.

Background: Remimazolam is a novel short-acting benzodiazepine. We investigated the effects of low doses of volatile anesthetic agents on motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) during remimazolam-remifentanil anesthesia.

Methods: Thirty-nine patients undergoing cervical spine surgery were randomly assigned to either the sevoflurane (n = 20) or desflurane (n = 19) groups. Volatile anesthetic agents were administered at 0.3, 0.6, and 0.8 minimum alveolar concentration (MACs) during remimazolam-remifentanil anesthesia. Significant changes were considered as more than 50% amplitude suppression and more than 10% latency increase from baseline values. The primary outcome was MEP amplitude change. Secondary outcomes included MEP latency, SSEP amplitude and latency, and group comparisons.

Results: The MEP amplitudes were slightly reduced at 0.3 MAC; however, a suppression of more than 50% from baseline values at 0.3 MAC, particularly in the upper limbs, was observed in a notable proportion of participants; 30.0% and 47.4% in the sevoflurane and desflurane groups, respectively. The corresponding percentages for the lower limbs were 15.0% and 15.8%, respectively. MEP amplitude suppression was more than 50% in the majority of participants at 0.6 and 0.8 MAC. No significant difference was observed between the groups. SSEPs exhibited no significant amplitude suppression or latency prolongation across all MAC levels.

Conclusions: Notable MEP amplitude suppression was observed in many patients when 0.3 MAC volatile anesthetics were used as adjuncts. Therefore, even low doses of volatile anesthetics must be added cautiously to remimazolam-based anesthesia to prevent confounding. The SSEPs were relatively preserved, regardless of MAC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
84
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信