双极脑电图峰值更良性。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1097/WNP.0000000000001112
Anita N Datta, Peter K H Wong
{"title":"双极脑电图峰值更良性。","authors":"Anita N Datta, Peter K H Wong","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Rolandic epileptiform discharges with tangential dipole (T-dipole) configurations are associated with favorable prognosis. Whether the same is true for T-dipole epileptiform discharges in other brain regions is less established and is the objective of this study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over 20 years, patients with epileptiform discharges were identified as follows: frontal (F = 176), temporal (T = 196), central (C = 201), parietal (P = 120), and occipital (O = 205). T-dipoles were documented. Clinical features of children with and without T-dipole were compared both regardless of brain region and separately for each brain region.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of T-dipoles was 232/898 (25.8%) overall and within different regions as follows: T = 104 (53.1%), O = 51 (24.9%), P = 23 (19.2%), C = 35 (17.4%), and F = 19 (10.8%). Most had epilepsy (T-dipole: 193 [83.2%] and nondipole: 532 [79.9%]). Regardless of region, T-dipole was associated with less drug-resistant epilepsy (11 [4.7%] vs. 202 [30.3%], P < 0.001), developmental delay (57 [24.6%] vs. 436 [51.0%], P < 0.001), school performance difficulties (SPD) (101 [43.5%] vs. 410 [61.6%], P < 0.001), autism (30 [12.9%] vs. 127 [19.1%], P = 0.037), and abnormal examination (28 [12.1%] vs. 257 [38.6%], P < 0.001]). Within different brain regions, on logistic regression, T-dipole was associated with lower odds of drug-resistant epilepsy (F, T, C, P, and O), developmental delay (F, T, C, and P), SPD (F, T, and C), autism (F and T), abnormal examination (F, T, C, and O), and abnormal neuroimaging (T, C, P, and O).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>On routine EEG analysis, focal epileptiform discharges with T-dipoles, regardless of brain region, are associated with a more favorable clinical course.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"42 4","pages":"304-313"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dipolar EEG Spikes Are More Benign.\",\"authors\":\"Anita N Datta, Peter K H Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Rolandic epileptiform discharges with tangential dipole (T-dipole) configurations are associated with favorable prognosis. Whether the same is true for T-dipole epileptiform discharges in other brain regions is less established and is the objective of this study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over 20 years, patients with epileptiform discharges were identified as follows: frontal (F = 176), temporal (T = 196), central (C = 201), parietal (P = 120), and occipital (O = 205). T-dipoles were documented. Clinical features of children with and without T-dipole were compared both regardless of brain region and separately for each brain region.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of T-dipoles was 232/898 (25.8%) overall and within different regions as follows: T = 104 (53.1%), O = 51 (24.9%), P = 23 (19.2%), C = 35 (17.4%), and F = 19 (10.8%). Most had epilepsy (T-dipole: 193 [83.2%] and nondipole: 532 [79.9%]). Regardless of region, T-dipole was associated with less drug-resistant epilepsy (11 [4.7%] vs. 202 [30.3%], P < 0.001), developmental delay (57 [24.6%] vs. 436 [51.0%], P < 0.001), school performance difficulties (SPD) (101 [43.5%] vs. 410 [61.6%], P < 0.001), autism (30 [12.9%] vs. 127 [19.1%], P = 0.037), and abnormal examination (28 [12.1%] vs. 257 [38.6%], P < 0.001]). Within different brain regions, on logistic regression, T-dipole was associated with lower odds of drug-resistant epilepsy (F, T, C, P, and O), developmental delay (F, T, C, and P), SPD (F, T, and C), autism (F and T), abnormal examination (F, T, C, and O), and abnormal neuroimaging (T, C, P, and O).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>On routine EEG analysis, focal epileptiform discharges with T-dipoles, regardless of brain region, are associated with a more favorable clinical course.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\"42 4\",\"pages\":\"304-313\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001112\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001112","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:具有切向偶极子(t -偶极子)结构的罗兰癫痫样放电与良好的预后相关。其他大脑区域的t偶极子癫痫样放电是否也同样如此尚不确定,这也是本研究的目的。方法:选取20多年来癫痫样放电患者,分别为额叶(F = 176)、颞叶(T = 196)、中央(C = 201)、顶叶(P = 120)和枕叶(O = 205)。记录了t偶极子。对有无t -偶极子患儿的临床特征进行比较,不论脑区大小,并分别对每个脑区进行比较。结果:T-偶极子总体患病率为232/898(25.8%),不同地区患病率分别为:T = 104 (53.1%), O = 51 (24.9%), P = 23 (19.2%), C = 35 (17.4%), F = 19(10.8%)。多数为癫痫(t -偶极子:193例[83.2%],非偶极子:532例[79.9%])。无论在哪个地区,t偶极子与耐药癫痫(11例[4.7%]比202例[30.3%],P < 0.001)、发育迟缓(57例[24.6%]比436例[51.0%],P < 0.001)、学业表现困难(SPD)(101例[43.5%]比410例[61.6%],P < 0.001)、自闭症(30例[12.9%]比127例[19.1%],P = 0.037)、检查异常(28例[12.1%]比257例[38.6%],P < 0.001)相关。在不同脑区,通过逻辑回归,T偶极子与耐药癫痫(F、T、C、P和O)、发育迟缓(F、T、C和P)、SPD (F、T和C)、自闭症(F和T)、异常检查(F、T、C和O)和异常神经影像学(T、C、P和O)的低发生率相关。结论:在常规脑电图分析中,局灶性癫痫样放电与t -偶极子无关,与更有利的临床病程相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dipolar EEG Spikes Are More Benign.

Purpose: Rolandic epileptiform discharges with tangential dipole (T-dipole) configurations are associated with favorable prognosis. Whether the same is true for T-dipole epileptiform discharges in other brain regions is less established and is the objective of this study.

Methods: Over 20 years, patients with epileptiform discharges were identified as follows: frontal (F = 176), temporal (T = 196), central (C = 201), parietal (P = 120), and occipital (O = 205). T-dipoles were documented. Clinical features of children with and without T-dipole were compared both regardless of brain region and separately for each brain region.

Results: The prevalence of T-dipoles was 232/898 (25.8%) overall and within different regions as follows: T = 104 (53.1%), O = 51 (24.9%), P = 23 (19.2%), C = 35 (17.4%), and F = 19 (10.8%). Most had epilepsy (T-dipole: 193 [83.2%] and nondipole: 532 [79.9%]). Regardless of region, T-dipole was associated with less drug-resistant epilepsy (11 [4.7%] vs. 202 [30.3%], P < 0.001), developmental delay (57 [24.6%] vs. 436 [51.0%], P < 0.001), school performance difficulties (SPD) (101 [43.5%] vs. 410 [61.6%], P < 0.001), autism (30 [12.9%] vs. 127 [19.1%], P = 0.037), and abnormal examination (28 [12.1%] vs. 257 [38.6%], P < 0.001]). Within different brain regions, on logistic regression, T-dipole was associated with lower odds of drug-resistant epilepsy (F, T, C, P, and O), developmental delay (F, T, C, and P), SPD (F, T, and C), autism (F and T), abnormal examination (F, T, C, and O), and abnormal neuroimaging (T, C, P, and O).

Conclusions: On routine EEG analysis, focal epileptiform discharges with T-dipoles, regardless of brain region, are associated with a more favorable clinical course.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
198
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment. Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信