三级青光眼学术服务的患者特征与预约“缺席”相关:一项横断面研究。

Biomedicine hub Pub Date : 2025-03-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000545307
Samantha Rosen, Julie Cassidy, Hai-Wei Liang, Lauren M Wasser, Doowon Huh, Andrew M Williams
{"title":"三级青光眼学术服务的患者特征与预约“缺席”相关:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Samantha Rosen, Julie Cassidy, Hai-Wei Liang, Lauren M Wasser, Doowon Huh, Andrew M Williams","doi":"10.1159/000545307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Appointment \"no-shows\" (NS) are a significant issue for glaucoma patients, potentially leading to loss to follow-up, disease progression, and irreversible vision loss. This study investigates sociodemographic and clinical risk factors associated with NS at a tertiary academic eye center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 100 glaucoma patients at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Vision Institute over 1 year was conducted. Patients were categorized as NS if they missed any glaucoma service appointment and as never no-show (NNS) if no appointments were missed. Baseline demographic, medical, and ophthalmic data were collected. Socioeconomic disadvantage was measured using the area deprivation index (ADI) based on residential ZIP codes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 100 patients, 35 were classified as NS and 65 as NNS. NS patients had significantly higher ADI scores (79 vs. 65; <i>p</i> = 0.03) and were more frequently Black (54% [19/35] vs. 26% [17/65]; <i>p</i> = 0.01). Medical comorbidities were more common in NS patients (83% [29/35] vs. 48% [31/65]; <i>p</i> < 0.001), as were mental health diagnoses (34% [12/35] vs. 8% [5/65]; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Insurance type, glaucoma type, intraocular pressure, and visual acuity were not significantly different between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher socioeconomic disadvantage, Black race, medical comorbidities, and mental health diagnoses were associated with appointment NS among glaucoma patients. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to address these risk factors, improve follow-up adherence, and reduce the risk of disease progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":101351,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicine hub","volume":"10 1","pages":"86-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12043280/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Characteristics Are Associated with Appointment \\\"No-Show\\\" at a Tertiary Academic Glaucoma Service: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Rosen, Julie Cassidy, Hai-Wei Liang, Lauren M Wasser, Doowon Huh, Andrew M Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000545307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Appointment \\\"no-shows\\\" (NS) are a significant issue for glaucoma patients, potentially leading to loss to follow-up, disease progression, and irreversible vision loss. This study investigates sociodemographic and clinical risk factors associated with NS at a tertiary academic eye center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 100 glaucoma patients at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Vision Institute over 1 year was conducted. Patients were categorized as NS if they missed any glaucoma service appointment and as never no-show (NNS) if no appointments were missed. Baseline demographic, medical, and ophthalmic data were collected. Socioeconomic disadvantage was measured using the area deprivation index (ADI) based on residential ZIP codes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 100 patients, 35 were classified as NS and 65 as NNS. NS patients had significantly higher ADI scores (79 vs. 65; <i>p</i> = 0.03) and were more frequently Black (54% [19/35] vs. 26% [17/65]; <i>p</i> = 0.01). Medical comorbidities were more common in NS patients (83% [29/35] vs. 48% [31/65]; <i>p</i> < 0.001), as were mental health diagnoses (34% [12/35] vs. 8% [5/65]; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Insurance type, glaucoma type, intraocular pressure, and visual acuity were not significantly different between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher socioeconomic disadvantage, Black race, medical comorbidities, and mental health diagnoses were associated with appointment NS among glaucoma patients. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to address these risk factors, improve follow-up adherence, and reduce the risk of disease progression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedicine hub\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"86-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12043280/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedicine hub\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545307\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicine hub","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预约“未到”(NS)是青光眼患者的一个重要问题,可能导致失去随访、疾病进展和不可逆的视力丧失。本研究调查了与三级学术眼科中心NS相关的社会人口学和临床危险因素。方法:对匹兹堡大学医学中心(UPMC)视力研究所1年来收治的100例青光眼患者进行回顾性分析。如果患者错过了任何青光眼服务预约,则将其归类为NS;如果没有错过任何预约,则将其归类为never no-show (NNS)。收集基线人口统计学、医学和眼科数据。社会经济劣势采用基于居住邮政编码的区域剥夺指数(ADI)来衡量。结果:100例患者中,NNS 35例,NNS 65例。NS患者的ADI评分明显更高(79比65;p = 0.03),黑人更常见(54%[19/35]对26% [17/65];P = 0.01)。内科合并症在NS患者中更为常见(83% [29/35]vs. 48% [31/65];P < 0.001),精神健康诊断也是如此(34%[12/35]对8% [5/65];P < 0.001)。保险类型、青光眼类型、眼压、视敏度组间差异无统计学意义。结论:较高的社会经济劣势、黑人种族、医疗合并症和心理健康诊断与青光眼患者的预约NS相关。这些发现强调需要有针对性的干预措施来解决这些风险因素,提高随访依从性,并降低疾病进展的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient Characteristics Are Associated with Appointment "No-Show" at a Tertiary Academic Glaucoma Service: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Introduction: Appointment "no-shows" (NS) are a significant issue for glaucoma patients, potentially leading to loss to follow-up, disease progression, and irreversible vision loss. This study investigates sociodemographic and clinical risk factors associated with NS at a tertiary academic eye center.

Methods: A retrospective review of 100 glaucoma patients at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Vision Institute over 1 year was conducted. Patients were categorized as NS if they missed any glaucoma service appointment and as never no-show (NNS) if no appointments were missed. Baseline demographic, medical, and ophthalmic data were collected. Socioeconomic disadvantage was measured using the area deprivation index (ADI) based on residential ZIP codes.

Results: Of 100 patients, 35 were classified as NS and 65 as NNS. NS patients had significantly higher ADI scores (79 vs. 65; p = 0.03) and were more frequently Black (54% [19/35] vs. 26% [17/65]; p = 0.01). Medical comorbidities were more common in NS patients (83% [29/35] vs. 48% [31/65]; p < 0.001), as were mental health diagnoses (34% [12/35] vs. 8% [5/65]; p < 0.001). Insurance type, glaucoma type, intraocular pressure, and visual acuity were not significantly different between groups.

Conclusion: Higher socioeconomic disadvantage, Black race, medical comorbidities, and mental health diagnoses were associated with appointment NS among glaucoma patients. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to address these risk factors, improve follow-up adherence, and reduce the risk of disease progression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信