{"title":"微型电子顶点定位器的体内外准确度和精密度评价。","authors":"Özlem Kara, Rüstem Kemal Sübay","doi":"10.1111/aej.12946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study was aimed to evaluate in vivo and in vitro accuracy and precision of Root ZXMini, Raypex6 and PropexPixi electronic apex locators (EALs) in both dry and wet conditions (5.25% NaOCl, sterile saline, 2% chlorhexidine, 17% EDTA). Fifty vital maxillary and mandibular incisors were included in in vivo, and 50 maxillary central incisors were used in the in vitro study. Measurements were classified as successful if stable electronic working lengths (EWLs) were within ±0.5 mm of actual working length (AWL). Statistics were performed using paired sample t-test, Kruskal–Wallis test and Chi-Square (<i>p</i> < 0.05). No significant differences in precision, accuracy and success rates were found among EALs (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Root ZXMini and Raypex6 could directly detect a 0.5 mm coronal zone than major apical foramen (MAF) in both settings. After a 0.5 mm reduction as recommended by the manufacturer, Propex Pixi in vivo EWLs could be between AWL and MAF; in vitro EWLs could be within 0.5 mm coronal than AWL.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55581,"journal":{"name":"Australian Endodontic Journal","volume":"51 2","pages":"329-335"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Vivo and In Vitro Accuracy and Precision Evaluations of Mini Electronic Apex Locators\",\"authors\":\"Özlem Kara, Rüstem Kemal Sübay\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aej.12946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This study was aimed to evaluate in vivo and in vitro accuracy and precision of Root ZXMini, Raypex6 and PropexPixi electronic apex locators (EALs) in both dry and wet conditions (5.25% NaOCl, sterile saline, 2% chlorhexidine, 17% EDTA). Fifty vital maxillary and mandibular incisors were included in in vivo, and 50 maxillary central incisors were used in the in vitro study. Measurements were classified as successful if stable electronic working lengths (EWLs) were within ±0.5 mm of actual working length (AWL). Statistics were performed using paired sample t-test, Kruskal–Wallis test and Chi-Square (<i>p</i> < 0.05). No significant differences in precision, accuracy and success rates were found among EALs (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Root ZXMini and Raypex6 could directly detect a 0.5 mm coronal zone than major apical foramen (MAF) in both settings. After a 0.5 mm reduction as recommended by the manufacturer, Propex Pixi in vivo EWLs could be between AWL and MAF; in vitro EWLs could be within 0.5 mm coronal than AWL.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Endodontic Journal\",\"volume\":\"51 2\",\"pages\":\"329-335\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Endodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aej.12946\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aej.12946","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
In Vivo and In Vitro Accuracy and Precision Evaluations of Mini Electronic Apex Locators
This study was aimed to evaluate in vivo and in vitro accuracy and precision of Root ZXMini, Raypex6 and PropexPixi electronic apex locators (EALs) in both dry and wet conditions (5.25% NaOCl, sterile saline, 2% chlorhexidine, 17% EDTA). Fifty vital maxillary and mandibular incisors were included in in vivo, and 50 maxillary central incisors were used in the in vitro study. Measurements were classified as successful if stable electronic working lengths (EWLs) were within ±0.5 mm of actual working length (AWL). Statistics were performed using paired sample t-test, Kruskal–Wallis test and Chi-Square (p < 0.05). No significant differences in precision, accuracy and success rates were found among EALs (p > 0.05). Root ZXMini and Raypex6 could directly detect a 0.5 mm coronal zone than major apical foramen (MAF) in both settings. After a 0.5 mm reduction as recommended by the manufacturer, Propex Pixi in vivo EWLs could be between AWL and MAF; in vitro EWLs could be within 0.5 mm coronal than AWL.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Endodontic Journal provides a forum for communication in the different fields that encompass endodontics for all specialists and dentists with an interest in the morphology, physiology, and pathology of the human tooth, in particular the dental pulp, root and peri-radicular tissues.
The Journal features regular clinical updates, research reports and case reports from authors worldwide, and also publishes meeting abstracts, society news and historical endodontic glimpses.
The Australian Endodontic Journal is a publication for dentists in general and specialist practice devoted solely to endodontics. It aims to promote communication in the different fields that encompass endodontics for those dentists who have a special interest in endodontics.