糖尿病预防计划及其结果研究:NIDDK的2型糖尿病预防之旅及其公共卫生影响。

IF 16.6
Diabetes care Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI:10.2337/dc25-0014
Jill P Crandall, Dana Dabelea, William C Knowler, David M Nathan, Marinella Temprosa
{"title":"糖尿病预防计划及其结果研究:NIDDK的2型糖尿病预防之旅及其公共卫生影响。","authors":"Jill P Crandall, Dana Dabelea, William C Knowler, David M Nathan, Marinella Temprosa","doi":"10.2337/dc25-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current-day epidemic of type 2 diabetes, largely driven by increased adiposity and reduced physical activity in the setting of genetic susceptibility, is a major public health challenge. The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) presciently proposed the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP), a multicenter randomized clinical trial, designed by investigators in conjunction with NIDDK staff and initiated in 1996. The primary goal of DPP was to determine whether an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILS) or metformin in comparison with placebo would reduce the development of diabetes in a high-risk population with prediabetes. After mean 2.8 years, ILS reduced diabetes risk by 58% and metformin by 31%, leading to study termination ahead of schedule due to demonstrated efficacy of both interventions. In 2002, an extension of the DPP study, the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study (DPPOS), was initiated for examination of the longer-term course and consequences of diabetes prevention. Over 21 years of median total follow-up, in comparison with the placebo group, cumulative diabetes incidence was reduced by 24% and 17% in the original ILS and metformin groups, respectively, with median increases in diabetes-free survival of 3.5 and 2.5 years/person. During long-term follow-up, there were no significant effects of the original DPP interventions on microvascular or cardiovascular outcomes. However, compared with prevalence of microvascular outcomes among participants who progressed to diabetes, prevalence among those who did not progress was significantly lower. Longer-term follow-up of the cohort continues with examination of relationships between diabetes and prediabetes and an expanded array of diabetes- and aging-related morbidities.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":"1101-1111"},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Diabetes Prevention Program and Its Outcomes Study: NIDDK's Journey Into the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes and Its Public Health Impact.\",\"authors\":\"Jill P Crandall, Dana Dabelea, William C Knowler, David M Nathan, Marinella Temprosa\",\"doi\":\"10.2337/dc25-0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The current-day epidemic of type 2 diabetes, largely driven by increased adiposity and reduced physical activity in the setting of genetic susceptibility, is a major public health challenge. The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) presciently proposed the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP), a multicenter randomized clinical trial, designed by investigators in conjunction with NIDDK staff and initiated in 1996. The primary goal of DPP was to determine whether an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILS) or metformin in comparison with placebo would reduce the development of diabetes in a high-risk population with prediabetes. After mean 2.8 years, ILS reduced diabetes risk by 58% and metformin by 31%, leading to study termination ahead of schedule due to demonstrated efficacy of both interventions. In 2002, an extension of the DPP study, the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study (DPPOS), was initiated for examination of the longer-term course and consequences of diabetes prevention. Over 21 years of median total follow-up, in comparison with the placebo group, cumulative diabetes incidence was reduced by 24% and 17% in the original ILS and metformin groups, respectively, with median increases in diabetes-free survival of 3.5 and 2.5 years/person. During long-term follow-up, there were no significant effects of the original DPP interventions on microvascular or cardiovascular outcomes. However, compared with prevalence of microvascular outcomes among participants who progressed to diabetes, prevalence among those who did not progress was significantly lower. Longer-term follow-up of the cohort continues with examination of relationships between diabetes and prediabetes and an expanded array of diabetes- and aging-related morbidities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1101-1111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178622/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前2型糖尿病的流行,主要是由于肥胖增加和遗传易感性背景下身体活动减少,是一项重大的公共卫生挑战。美国国家糖尿病、消化和肾脏疾病研究所(NIDDK)有先见之明地提出了糖尿病预防计划(DPP),这是一项多中心随机临床试验,由研究人员与NIDDK的工作人员共同设计,于1996年启动。DPP的主要目的是确定与安慰剂相比,强化生活方式干预(ILS)或二甲双胍是否能减少糖尿病前期高危人群的糖尿病发展。平均2.8年后,ILS降低了58%的糖尿病风险,二甲双胍降低了31%,由于两种干预措施的有效性证明,研究提前结束。2002年,DPP研究的延伸,糖尿病预防项目结果研究(DPPOS),开始检查糖尿病预防的长期过程和后果。在21年的中位总随访中,与安慰剂组相比,原始ILS组和二甲双胍组的累积糖尿病发病率分别降低了24%和17%,无糖尿病生存期中位数分别增加了3.5年和2.5年/人。在长期随访中,原始DPP干预对微血管或心血管结局没有显著影响。然而,与进展为糖尿病的参与者中微血管结局的患病率相比,未进展的参与者的患病率明显较低。该队列的长期随访继续检查糖尿病和前驱糖尿病之间的关系,并扩大了糖尿病和衰老相关发病率的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Diabetes Prevention Program and Its Outcomes Study: NIDDK's Journey Into the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes and Its Public Health Impact.

The Diabetes Prevention Program and Its Outcomes Study: NIDDK's Journey Into the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes and Its Public Health Impact.

The Diabetes Prevention Program and Its Outcomes Study: NIDDK's Journey Into the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes and Its Public Health Impact.

The Diabetes Prevention Program and Its Outcomes Study: NIDDK's Journey Into the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes and Its Public Health Impact.

The current-day epidemic of type 2 diabetes, largely driven by increased adiposity and reduced physical activity in the setting of genetic susceptibility, is a major public health challenge. The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) presciently proposed the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP), a multicenter randomized clinical trial, designed by investigators in conjunction with NIDDK staff and initiated in 1996. The primary goal of DPP was to determine whether an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILS) or metformin in comparison with placebo would reduce the development of diabetes in a high-risk population with prediabetes. After mean 2.8 years, ILS reduced diabetes risk by 58% and metformin by 31%, leading to study termination ahead of schedule due to demonstrated efficacy of both interventions. In 2002, an extension of the DPP study, the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study (DPPOS), was initiated for examination of the longer-term course and consequences of diabetes prevention. Over 21 years of median total follow-up, in comparison with the placebo group, cumulative diabetes incidence was reduced by 24% and 17% in the original ILS and metformin groups, respectively, with median increases in diabetes-free survival of 3.5 and 2.5 years/person. During long-term follow-up, there were no significant effects of the original DPP interventions on microvascular or cardiovascular outcomes. However, compared with prevalence of microvascular outcomes among participants who progressed to diabetes, prevalence among those who did not progress was significantly lower. Longer-term follow-up of the cohort continues with examination of relationships between diabetes and prediabetes and an expanded array of diabetes- and aging-related morbidities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
29.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信