人工智能、隐形受害者和电车问题。

IF 3.4 2区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Jacob M Appel
{"title":"人工智能、隐形受害者和电车问题。","authors":"Jacob M Appel","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The allocation of scarce healthcare resources inherently involves trade-offs between the interests of 'visible' and 'invisible' victims (ie, individuals who are aware that they are shortchanged by trade-offs and those who are not). At present, decisions regarding such trade-offs are often based on highly speculative predictions; the vast array of possible trade-offs simply cannot be enumerated, let alone the optimal outcomes calculated, by human beings. Artificial intelligence has the potential to change that reality by mining large data sets and other sources of information in order to produce far more precise and comprehensive predictions of likely outcomes and to delineate optimal allocation choices. Such technologies will inevitably render 'invisible' victims 'visible', generating a colossal, real-world trolley dilemma for anyone involved in medical or healthcare policy decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":16317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence, invisible victims and the trolley problem.\",\"authors\":\"Jacob M Appel\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jme-2024-110626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The allocation of scarce healthcare resources inherently involves trade-offs between the interests of 'visible' and 'invisible' victims (ie, individuals who are aware that they are shortchanged by trade-offs and those who are not). At present, decisions regarding such trade-offs are often based on highly speculative predictions; the vast array of possible trade-offs simply cannot be enumerated, let alone the optimal outcomes calculated, by human beings. Artificial intelligence has the potential to change that reality by mining large data sets and other sources of information in order to produce far more precise and comprehensive predictions of likely outcomes and to delineate optimal allocation choices. Such technologies will inevitably render 'invisible' victims 'visible', generating a colossal, real-world trolley dilemma for anyone involved in medical or healthcare policy decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2024-110626\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2024-110626","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

稀缺医疗资源的分配本质上涉及“可见”和“不可见”受害者(即意识到自己在权衡中被亏了的个人和没有意识到的人)利益之间的权衡。目前,关于这种权衡的决定往往是基于高度投机的预测;人类根本无法列举大量可能的权衡,更不用说计算出的最佳结果了。人工智能有可能通过挖掘大型数据集和其他信息来源来改变这一现实,从而对可能的结果做出更精确、更全面的预测,并描绘出最佳的分配选择。这些技术将不可避免地使“看不见的”受害者“看得见”,给任何参与医疗或医疗保健政策决策的人带来巨大的、现实世界的电车困境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial intelligence, invisible victims and the trolley problem.

The allocation of scarce healthcare resources inherently involves trade-offs between the interests of 'visible' and 'invisible' victims (ie, individuals who are aware that they are shortchanged by trade-offs and those who are not). At present, decisions regarding such trade-offs are often based on highly speculative predictions; the vast array of possible trade-offs simply cannot be enumerated, let alone the optimal outcomes calculated, by human beings. Artificial intelligence has the potential to change that reality by mining large data sets and other sources of information in order to produce far more precise and comprehensive predictions of likely outcomes and to delineate optimal allocation choices. Such technologies will inevitably render 'invisible' victims 'visible', generating a colossal, real-world trolley dilemma for anyone involved in medical or healthcare policy decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Ethics
Journal of Medical Ethics 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
164
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Ethics is a leading international journal that reflects the whole field of medical ethics. The journal seeks to promote ethical reflection and conduct in scientific research and medical practice. It features articles on various ethical aspects of health care relevant to health care professionals, members of clinical ethics committees, medical ethics professionals, researchers and bioscientists, policy makers and patients. Subscribers to the Journal of Medical Ethics also receive Medical Humanities journal at no extra cost. JME is the official journal of the Institute of Medical Ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信