暴露研究中使用的共溶剂是否同样扰乱大水蚤的代谢谱?

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Salwa Hajir, Karl J Jobst, Sonya Kleywegt, André J Simpson, Myrna J Simpson
{"title":"暴露研究中使用的共溶剂是否同样扰乱大水蚤的代谢谱?","authors":"Salwa Hajir, Karl J Jobst, Sonya Kleywegt, André J Simpson, Myrna J Simpson","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dissolution methods such as co-solvents are used to solubilize insoluble compounds in exposure experiments. Several exposure studies have followed the guidelines from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development where co-solvents are applied at 0.01% v/v of the total exposure volume. Although no observable apical endpoint abnormalities were reported following these guidelines, little is known about the molecular-level impacts of co-solvents used in exposure studies. A targeted metabolomics approach using liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry was used to assess Daphnia magna responses to four commonly used co-solvents, including acetone (ACT), acetonitrile (ACN), methanol (MeOH), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), at three different levels (0.01%, 0.05%, and 0.1% v/v) over 48 hr. Based on the observed metabolic disruptions, exposure to MeOH and DMSO induced higher metabolic perturbations in amino acid levels and associated biochemical pathways in comparison to ACT and ACN exposures. However, as with mixtures, when co-solvents are combined with the pollutants under investigation, there is a possibility for additive, synergistic, or antagonistic interactions. Hence, to examine the possible impairments in co-solvent and pollutant mixtures, ACT and ACN applied at 0.01% v/v were chosen to be tested with phenanthridine (PN). Daphnia magna exposure to PN dissolved in ACT had less disruptions; in contrast to PN prepared in ACN, which triggered a higher degree of antagonism in the D. magna metabolic profile. Consequently, exposing D. magna to ACT applied at 0.01% v/v resulted in the lowest metabolic perturbation in both parts of this study, suggesting that it is the least disruptive co-solvent for molecular-level exposure studies involving D. magna.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"1622-1635"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do co-solvents used in exposure studies equally perturb the metabolic profile of Daphnia magna?\",\"authors\":\"Salwa Hajir, Karl J Jobst, Sonya Kleywegt, André J Simpson, Myrna J Simpson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dissolution methods such as co-solvents are used to solubilize insoluble compounds in exposure experiments. Several exposure studies have followed the guidelines from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development where co-solvents are applied at 0.01% v/v of the total exposure volume. Although no observable apical endpoint abnormalities were reported following these guidelines, little is known about the molecular-level impacts of co-solvents used in exposure studies. A targeted metabolomics approach using liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry was used to assess Daphnia magna responses to four commonly used co-solvents, including acetone (ACT), acetonitrile (ACN), methanol (MeOH), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), at three different levels (0.01%, 0.05%, and 0.1% v/v) over 48 hr. Based on the observed metabolic disruptions, exposure to MeOH and DMSO induced higher metabolic perturbations in amino acid levels and associated biochemical pathways in comparison to ACT and ACN exposures. However, as with mixtures, when co-solvents are combined with the pollutants under investigation, there is a possibility for additive, synergistic, or antagonistic interactions. Hence, to examine the possible impairments in co-solvent and pollutant mixtures, ACT and ACN applied at 0.01% v/v were chosen to be tested with phenanthridine (PN). Daphnia magna exposure to PN dissolved in ACT had less disruptions; in contrast to PN prepared in ACN, which triggered a higher degree of antagonism in the D. magna metabolic profile. Consequently, exposing D. magna to ACT applied at 0.01% v/v resulted in the lowest metabolic perturbation in both parts of this study, suggesting that it is the least disruptive co-solvent for molecular-level exposure studies involving D. magna.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1622-1635\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf068\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在暴露实验中,溶解方法如共溶剂用于溶解不溶性化合物。若干接触研究遵循了经济合作与发展组织的指导方针,其中共溶剂的用量为总接触量的0.01% v/v。虽然没有可观察到的根尖端点异常的报道遵循这些指南,很少知道在暴露研究中使用的共溶剂的分子水平的影响。采用液相色谱和三重四极杆质谱联用的靶向代谢组学方法,研究了水蚤对丙酮(ACT)、乙腈(ACN)、甲醇(MeOH)和二甲亚砜(DMSO)等四种常用共溶剂在0.01%、0.05%和0.1% v/v水平下48小时内的反应。根据观察到的代谢中断,与ACT和ACN暴露相比,暴露于MeOH和DMSO诱导了更高的氨基酸水平和相关生化途径的代谢扰动。然而,与混合物一样,当共溶剂与所研究的污染物结合时,有可能发生加法、增效或拮抗相互作用。因此,为了检验在共溶剂和污染物混合物中可能存在的损伤,选择0.01% v/v的ACT和ACN,用菲苯胺(PN)进行测试。大水蚤暴露于溶解在ACT中的PN的破坏较小;与ACN中制备的PN相反,后者在D. magna代谢谱中引发了更高程度的拮抗作用。因此,在本研究的两个部分中,将D. magna暴露于0.01% v/v的ACT中导致最低的代谢扰动,这表明它是涉及D. magna的分子水平暴露研究中破坏性最小的共溶剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do co-solvents used in exposure studies equally perturb the metabolic profile of Daphnia magna?

Dissolution methods such as co-solvents are used to solubilize insoluble compounds in exposure experiments. Several exposure studies have followed the guidelines from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development where co-solvents are applied at 0.01% v/v of the total exposure volume. Although no observable apical endpoint abnormalities were reported following these guidelines, little is known about the molecular-level impacts of co-solvents used in exposure studies. A targeted metabolomics approach using liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry was used to assess Daphnia magna responses to four commonly used co-solvents, including acetone (ACT), acetonitrile (ACN), methanol (MeOH), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), at three different levels (0.01%, 0.05%, and 0.1% v/v) over 48 hr. Based on the observed metabolic disruptions, exposure to MeOH and DMSO induced higher metabolic perturbations in amino acid levels and associated biochemical pathways in comparison to ACT and ACN exposures. However, as with mixtures, when co-solvents are combined with the pollutants under investigation, there is a possibility for additive, synergistic, or antagonistic interactions. Hence, to examine the possible impairments in co-solvent and pollutant mixtures, ACT and ACN applied at 0.01% v/v were chosen to be tested with phenanthridine (PN). Daphnia magna exposure to PN dissolved in ACT had less disruptions; in contrast to PN prepared in ACN, which triggered a higher degree of antagonism in the D. magna metabolic profile. Consequently, exposing D. magna to ACT applied at 0.01% v/v resulted in the lowest metabolic perturbation in both parts of this study, suggesting that it is the least disruptive co-solvent for molecular-level exposure studies involving D. magna.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...] Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信