{"title":"免疫检查点抑制剂对转移性或复发性头颈癌患者生活质量的影响:一项系统评价方案","authors":"Huyen Lai, Eng Ooi, Matthew Stephenson","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to evaluate the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors compared to radiation and other systemic therapies, such as chemotherapy and targeted therapies, on the quality of life of patients with metastatic or recurrent head and neck cancer.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancers are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The treatment modalities including radiation and chemotherapy have considerable negative effects on quality of life. Immunotherapy, in particular immune checkpoint inhibitors, is a promising treatment option, offering effective disease control with improved patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>The review will include experimental or observational studies that compare the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors with either radiation therapy or systemic therapies (eg, chemotherapy, targeted molecular agents) on the quality of life of patients (aged >18 years) with head and neck cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The databases to be searched include MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Sources of unpublished studies and gray literature to be searched will include ClinicalTrials.gov and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Titles and abstracts will be screened, and full texts of articles that meet the inclusion criteria will be retrieved for further assessment. Two independent reviewers will appraise eligible studies using the JBI tools for experimental and observational research, and will extract data. Where appropriate, meta-analysis will be conducted. The certainty of the findings will be evaluated following the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024567283.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors on the quality of life of patients with metastatic or recurrent head and neck cancer: a systematic review protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Huyen Lai, Eng Ooi, Matthew Stephenson\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/JBIES-24-00392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to evaluate the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors compared to radiation and other systemic therapies, such as chemotherapy and targeted therapies, on the quality of life of patients with metastatic or recurrent head and neck cancer.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancers are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The treatment modalities including radiation and chemotherapy have considerable negative effects on quality of life. Immunotherapy, in particular immune checkpoint inhibitors, is a promising treatment option, offering effective disease control with improved patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>The review will include experimental or observational studies that compare the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors with either radiation therapy or systemic therapies (eg, chemotherapy, targeted molecular agents) on the quality of life of patients (aged >18 years) with head and neck cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The databases to be searched include MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Sources of unpublished studies and gray literature to be searched will include ClinicalTrials.gov and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Titles and abstracts will be screened, and full texts of articles that meet the inclusion criteria will be retrieved for further assessment. Two independent reviewers will appraise eligible studies using the JBI tools for experimental and observational research, and will extract data. Where appropriate, meta-analysis will be conducted. The certainty of the findings will be evaluated following the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024567283.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00392\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本综述的目的是评估免疫检查点抑制剂与放疗和其他全身疗法(如化疗和靶向治疗)相比,对转移性或复发性头颈癌患者生活质量的影响。复发性和转移性头颈癌与高发病率和死亡率相关。包括放疗和化疗在内的治疗方式对生活质量有相当大的负面影响。免疫疗法,特别是免疫检查点抑制剂,是一种有希望的治疗选择,提供有效的疾病控制和改善患者报告的结果。纳入标准:本综述将包括比较免疫检查点抑制剂与放射治疗或全身治疗(如化疗、靶向分子药物)对头颈癌患者(年龄在0 ~ 18岁)生活质量影响的实验或观察性研究。方法:检索数据库包括MEDLINE (Ovid)、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science Core Collection和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central)。搜索未发表的研究和灰色文献的来源将包括ClinicalTrials.gov和ProQuest dissertation and Theses。将对标题和摘要进行筛选,并检索符合纳入标准的文章全文以供进一步评估。两名独立审稿人将使用JBI工具评估符合条件的研究,用于实验和观察研究,并将提取数据。在适当的情况下,将进行meta分析。调查结果的确定性将根据建议、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)方法进行评估。审核注册:PROSPERO CRD42024567283。
Effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors on the quality of life of patients with metastatic or recurrent head and neck cancer: a systematic review protocol.
Objective: The objective of this review is to evaluate the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors compared to radiation and other systemic therapies, such as chemotherapy and targeted therapies, on the quality of life of patients with metastatic or recurrent head and neck cancer.
Introduction: Recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancers are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The treatment modalities including radiation and chemotherapy have considerable negative effects on quality of life. Immunotherapy, in particular immune checkpoint inhibitors, is a promising treatment option, offering effective disease control with improved patient-reported outcomes.
Inclusion criteria: The review will include experimental or observational studies that compare the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors with either radiation therapy or systemic therapies (eg, chemotherapy, targeted molecular agents) on the quality of life of patients (aged >18 years) with head and neck cancer.
Methods: The databases to be searched include MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Sources of unpublished studies and gray literature to be searched will include ClinicalTrials.gov and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Titles and abstracts will be screened, and full texts of articles that meet the inclusion criteria will be retrieved for further assessment. Two independent reviewers will appraise eligible studies using the JBI tools for experimental and observational research, and will extract data. Where appropriate, meta-analysis will be conducted. The certainty of the findings will be evaluated following the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.