{"title":"晚期癌症患者及其家庭照顾者的生活质量及评价因素。","authors":"Jia Liu, Yuexia Zhang, Ting Guan, Xiaomeng Wang, Chunxuan Ma, Laurel Northouse, Lixin Song","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09512-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Few existing interventions have effectively improved the quality of life (QOL) for patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers, partly due to limited research on the factors associated with QOL. Guided by an adapted stress-coping model, this study aimed to examine the associations between the QOL of cancer patients and their caregivers and their primary and secondary appraisals. Primary appraisals involve perceptions and evaluations of advanced cancer and related caregiving, while secondary appraisals relate to their available resources and coping capabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using multi-level modeling, we conducted a secondary analysis of the baseline data collected from a randomized clinical trial that examined the effects of a family-based, psychoeducational support program for patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers (N = 362 dyads).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The appraisal variables hypothesized in the adapted stress-coping model explained 74.14% of the variance in the QOL of patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers when controlling for demographics and other disease-related variables. Better QOL in patients and caregivers was associated with less negative appraisals of illness/caregiving, less uncertainty and hopelessness, less avoidant coping strategies, more family support, more health behaviors, higher self-efficacy, and more active coping strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study highlights the significant impact that advanced cancer has on patients and their caregivers' perceptions, responses to the illness, and QOL. Future interventions may benefit from addressing illness/caregiving appraisals, uncertainty, hopelessness, family support, health behaviors, self-efficacy, and coping strategies. However, further research is needed to determine the effectiveness of interventions specifically targeting these factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 6","pages":"471"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078350/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of life and appraisal factors of patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers.\",\"authors\":\"Jia Liu, Yuexia Zhang, Ting Guan, Xiaomeng Wang, Chunxuan Ma, Laurel Northouse, Lixin Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00520-025-09512-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Few existing interventions have effectively improved the quality of life (QOL) for patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers, partly due to limited research on the factors associated with QOL. Guided by an adapted stress-coping model, this study aimed to examine the associations between the QOL of cancer patients and their caregivers and their primary and secondary appraisals. Primary appraisals involve perceptions and evaluations of advanced cancer and related caregiving, while secondary appraisals relate to their available resources and coping capabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using multi-level modeling, we conducted a secondary analysis of the baseline data collected from a randomized clinical trial that examined the effects of a family-based, psychoeducational support program for patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers (N = 362 dyads).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The appraisal variables hypothesized in the adapted stress-coping model explained 74.14% of the variance in the QOL of patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers when controlling for demographics and other disease-related variables. Better QOL in patients and caregivers was associated with less negative appraisals of illness/caregiving, less uncertainty and hopelessness, less avoidant coping strategies, more family support, more health behaviors, higher self-efficacy, and more active coping strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study highlights the significant impact that advanced cancer has on patients and their caregivers' perceptions, responses to the illness, and QOL. Future interventions may benefit from addressing illness/caregiving appraisals, uncertainty, hopelessness, family support, health behaviors, self-efficacy, and coping strategies. However, further research is needed to determine the effectiveness of interventions specifically targeting these factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"volume\":\"33 6\",\"pages\":\"471\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078350/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09512-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09512-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quality of life and appraisal factors of patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers.
Purpose: Few existing interventions have effectively improved the quality of life (QOL) for patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers, partly due to limited research on the factors associated with QOL. Guided by an adapted stress-coping model, this study aimed to examine the associations between the QOL of cancer patients and their caregivers and their primary and secondary appraisals. Primary appraisals involve perceptions and evaluations of advanced cancer and related caregiving, while secondary appraisals relate to their available resources and coping capabilities.
Methods: Using multi-level modeling, we conducted a secondary analysis of the baseline data collected from a randomized clinical trial that examined the effects of a family-based, psychoeducational support program for patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers (N = 362 dyads).
Results: The appraisal variables hypothesized in the adapted stress-coping model explained 74.14% of the variance in the QOL of patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers when controlling for demographics and other disease-related variables. Better QOL in patients and caregivers was associated with less negative appraisals of illness/caregiving, less uncertainty and hopelessness, less avoidant coping strategies, more family support, more health behaviors, higher self-efficacy, and more active coping strategies.
Conclusion: Our study highlights the significant impact that advanced cancer has on patients and their caregivers' perceptions, responses to the illness, and QOL. Future interventions may benefit from addressing illness/caregiving appraisals, uncertainty, hopelessness, family support, health behaviors, self-efficacy, and coping strategies. However, further research is needed to determine the effectiveness of interventions specifically targeting these factors.
期刊介绍:
Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease.
Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.