加巴喷丁和d -环丝氨酸单独使用以及与纳洛酮联合使用美沙酮在纳洛酮新反应鉴别程序下维持人的反应。

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Behavioural Pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1097/FBP.0000000000000823
Lauren R Fitzgerald, Nichole C Stanley, Joseph B Guise, Christopher S Cargile, Michael J Mancino, Alison H Oliveto
{"title":"加巴喷丁和d -环丝氨酸单独使用以及与纳洛酮联合使用美沙酮在纳洛酮新反应鉴别程序下维持人的反应。","authors":"Lauren R Fitzgerald, Nichole C Stanley, Joseph B Guise, Christopher S Cargile, Michael J Mancino, Alison H Oliveto","doi":"10.1097/FBP.0000000000000823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study examined the impact of the N-type calcium channel blocker gabapentin (GBP) and the partial glycine agonist D-cycloserine (CYC) to attenuate the behavioral effects of naloxone in opioid-dependent humans responding under a naloxone discrimination procedure. Methadone-maintained participants were trained to distinguish between a low dose of naloxone (0.15 mg/70 kg, i.m.; i.e., drug A) and placebo (i.e. drug B) under an instructed novel-response drug discrimination procedure, in which participants identify the drug condition as 'A', 'B', or 'N' (neither A nor B - 'novel'). Once the discrimination was acquired, doses of CYC (0, 500, and 625 mg) and GBP (0, 100, 200, and 400 mg) each alone and in combination with the training dose of naloxone were tested. GBP alone produced only placebo-appropriate responding and did not significantly alter naloxone discrimination when coadministered with naloxone, though it modestly reduced naloxone-induced visual analog scale ratings of drug 'strength'. CYC alone also produced predominantly placebo-appropriate responding and did not modulate naloxone-appropriate responding, but increased ratings of bad effects and decreased ratings of like placebo relative to naloxone alone at the 500 mg dose. These null findings regarding the modulation of naloxone discrimination highlight the limited efficacy of GBP and CYC in this context, contributing to the understanding of pharmacological interactions with opioid antagonists and their potential implications for opioid withdrawal treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":8832,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"265-275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226226/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gabapentin and D-cycloserine alone and in combination with naloxone in methadone-maintained humans responding under a naloxone novel-response discrimination procedure.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren R Fitzgerald, Nichole C Stanley, Joseph B Guise, Christopher S Cargile, Michael J Mancino, Alison H Oliveto\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/FBP.0000000000000823\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The present study examined the impact of the N-type calcium channel blocker gabapentin (GBP) and the partial glycine agonist D-cycloserine (CYC) to attenuate the behavioral effects of naloxone in opioid-dependent humans responding under a naloxone discrimination procedure. Methadone-maintained participants were trained to distinguish between a low dose of naloxone (0.15 mg/70 kg, i.m.; i.e., drug A) and placebo (i.e. drug B) under an instructed novel-response drug discrimination procedure, in which participants identify the drug condition as 'A', 'B', or 'N' (neither A nor B - 'novel'). Once the discrimination was acquired, doses of CYC (0, 500, and 625 mg) and GBP (0, 100, 200, and 400 mg) each alone and in combination with the training dose of naloxone were tested. GBP alone produced only placebo-appropriate responding and did not significantly alter naloxone discrimination when coadministered with naloxone, though it modestly reduced naloxone-induced visual analog scale ratings of drug 'strength'. CYC alone also produced predominantly placebo-appropriate responding and did not modulate naloxone-appropriate responding, but increased ratings of bad effects and decreased ratings of like placebo relative to naloxone alone at the 500 mg dose. These null findings regarding the modulation of naloxone discrimination highlight the limited efficacy of GBP and CYC in this context, contributing to the understanding of pharmacological interactions with opioid antagonists and their potential implications for opioid withdrawal treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioural Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"265-275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226226/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioural Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0000000000000823\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0000000000000823","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了n型钙通道阻滞剂加巴喷丁(GBP)和部分甘氨酸激动剂d-环丝氨酸(CYC)在纳洛酮歧视程序下对阿片类药物依赖者的行为影响的减弱作用。接受美沙酮维持治疗的参与者被训练区分低剂量纳洛酮(0.15 mg/70 kg, i.m;即药物A)和安慰剂(即药物B),在指示的新反应药物区分程序下,参与者将药物状况识别为“A”,“B”或“N”(既不是A也不是B -“新颖”)。一旦获得鉴别,分别测试CYC(0、500和625 mg)和GBP(0、100、200和400 mg)的剂量,并与纳洛酮的训练剂量联合使用。单独使用GBP只产生与安慰剂相适应的反应,当与纳洛酮共同使用时,GBP没有显著改变纳洛酮的歧视,尽管它适度降低了纳洛酮引起的药物“强度”的视觉模拟量表评分。单独CYC也主要产生安慰剂适宜的反应,而不调节纳洛酮适宜的反应,但在500mg剂量下,相对于单独纳洛酮,CYC增加了不良反应的评级,降低了类似安慰剂的评级。这些关于调节纳洛酮歧视的无效发现强调了GBP和CYC在这种情况下的有限疗效,有助于理解与阿片类拮抗剂的药理学相互作用及其对阿片类药物戒断治疗的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gabapentin and D-cycloserine alone and in combination with naloxone in methadone-maintained humans responding under a naloxone novel-response discrimination procedure.

The present study examined the impact of the N-type calcium channel blocker gabapentin (GBP) and the partial glycine agonist D-cycloserine (CYC) to attenuate the behavioral effects of naloxone in opioid-dependent humans responding under a naloxone discrimination procedure. Methadone-maintained participants were trained to distinguish between a low dose of naloxone (0.15 mg/70 kg, i.m.; i.e., drug A) and placebo (i.e. drug B) under an instructed novel-response drug discrimination procedure, in which participants identify the drug condition as 'A', 'B', or 'N' (neither A nor B - 'novel'). Once the discrimination was acquired, doses of CYC (0, 500, and 625 mg) and GBP (0, 100, 200, and 400 mg) each alone and in combination with the training dose of naloxone were tested. GBP alone produced only placebo-appropriate responding and did not significantly alter naloxone discrimination when coadministered with naloxone, though it modestly reduced naloxone-induced visual analog scale ratings of drug 'strength'. CYC alone also produced predominantly placebo-appropriate responding and did not modulate naloxone-appropriate responding, but increased ratings of bad effects and decreased ratings of like placebo relative to naloxone alone at the 500 mg dose. These null findings regarding the modulation of naloxone discrimination highlight the limited efficacy of GBP and CYC in this context, contributing to the understanding of pharmacological interactions with opioid antagonists and their potential implications for opioid withdrawal treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioural Pharmacology
Behavioural Pharmacology 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioural Pharmacology accepts original full and short research reports in diverse areas ranging from ethopharmacology to the pharmacology of schedule-controlled operant behaviour, provided that their primary focus is behavioural. Suitable topics include drug, chemical and hormonal effects on behaviour, the neurochemical mechanisms under-lying behaviour, and behavioural methods for the study of drug action. Both animal and human studies are welcome; however, studies reporting neurochemical data should have a predominantly behavioural focus, and human studies should not consist exclusively of clinical trials or case reports. Preference is given to studies that demonstrate and develop the potential of behavioural methods, and to papers reporting findings of direct relevance to clinical problems. Papers making a significant theoretical contribution are particularly welcome and, where possible and merited, space is made available for authors to explore fully the theoretical implications of their findings. Reviews of an area of the literature or at an appropriate stage in the development of an author’s own work are welcome. Commentaries in areas of current interest are also considered for publication, as are Reviews and Commentaries in areas outside behavioural pharmacology, but of importance and interest to behavioural pharmacologists. Behavioural Pharmacology publishes frequent Special Issues on current hot topics. The editors welcome correspondence about whether a paper in preparation might be suitable for inclusion in a Special Issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信