使用机器学习算法预测淋巴瘤侵袭性。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Julien Cabo, Benoît Bihin, Nicolas Debortoli, Virginie Lepage, Reza Soleimani, Rhita Bennis, Julien Favresse, Thierry Vander Borght, Carlos Graux, Caroline Fervaille, Jonathan Degosserie, Marie Pouplard, François Mullier
{"title":"使用机器学习算法预测淋巴瘤侵袭性。","authors":"Julien Cabo,&nbsp;Benoît Bihin,&nbsp;Nicolas Debortoli,&nbsp;Virginie Lepage,&nbsp;Reza Soleimani,&nbsp;Rhita Bennis,&nbsp;Julien Favresse,&nbsp;Thierry Vander Borght,&nbsp;Carlos Graux,&nbsp;Caroline Fervaille,&nbsp;Jonathan Degosserie,&nbsp;Marie Pouplard,&nbsp;François Mullier","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.14474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Lymph nodes are essential to diagnose lymphoid neoplasms, metastases, and infections. Some lymphomas, particularly aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), need urgent diagnosis. Combining lymph node cytology (LNC) and flow cytometry (FC) with other rapidly available parameters through multivariable predictive models could offer valuable diagnostic information while waiting for anatomopathological results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Results of 196 lymph node specimens were retrospectively analyzed for parameters like age, sex, LNC, FC, positron emission tomography scan, lymphocytosis, leukocytosis, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, and hemoglobin. We constructed five multivariable models predicting the aggressive nature of lymphoma as defined by the anatomopathological diagnostic. The first three were logistic regression models based on two (model 1), four (model 2), and up to 16 independent variables (model 3). The last two models were based on ensemble learning algorithms, bagging (model 4) and boosting (model 5), respectively. The performance of these five models was compared after 10-fold cross-validation, evaluating metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Compared to individual variables associated with the aggressive nature of the lymphoma (AUCs from 0.69 to 0.87), the multivariable models achieved better AUCs, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94. The best model (model 5) achieved a sensitivity and a specificity of 77% and 94%, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>LNC, FC, and other rapidly available parameters are associated with the aggressive nature of the lymphomas. It is possible to combine them in multivariable models to obtain a valuable diagnostic information and to initiate a prompt treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14120,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","volume":"47 5","pages":"859-868"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of Lymphoma Aggressiveness Using Machine Learning Algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Julien Cabo,&nbsp;Benoît Bihin,&nbsp;Nicolas Debortoli,&nbsp;Virginie Lepage,&nbsp;Reza Soleimani,&nbsp;Rhita Bennis,&nbsp;Julien Favresse,&nbsp;Thierry Vander Borght,&nbsp;Carlos Graux,&nbsp;Caroline Fervaille,&nbsp;Jonathan Degosserie,&nbsp;Marie Pouplard,&nbsp;François Mullier\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijlh.14474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Lymph nodes are essential to diagnose lymphoid neoplasms, metastases, and infections. Some lymphomas, particularly aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), need urgent diagnosis. Combining lymph node cytology (LNC) and flow cytometry (FC) with other rapidly available parameters through multivariable predictive models could offer valuable diagnostic information while waiting for anatomopathological results.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Results of 196 lymph node specimens were retrospectively analyzed for parameters like age, sex, LNC, FC, positron emission tomography scan, lymphocytosis, leukocytosis, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, and hemoglobin. We constructed five multivariable models predicting the aggressive nature of lymphoma as defined by the anatomopathological diagnostic. The first three were logistic regression models based on two (model 1), four (model 2), and up to 16 independent variables (model 3). The last two models were based on ensemble learning algorithms, bagging (model 4) and boosting (model 5), respectively. The performance of these five models was compared after 10-fold cross-validation, evaluating metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Compared to individual variables associated with the aggressive nature of the lymphoma (AUCs from 0.69 to 0.87), the multivariable models achieved better AUCs, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94. The best model (model 5) achieved a sensitivity and a specificity of 77% and 94%, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>LNC, FC, and other rapidly available parameters are associated with the aggressive nature of the lymphomas. It is possible to combine them in multivariable models to obtain a valuable diagnostic information and to initiate a prompt treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology\",\"volume\":\"47 5\",\"pages\":\"859-868\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijlh.14474\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijlh.14474","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:淋巴结是诊断淋巴样肿瘤、转移和感染所必需的。一些淋巴瘤,特别是侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL),需要紧急诊断。通过多变量预测模型,将淋巴结细胞学(LNC)和流式细胞术(FC)与其他快速获得的参数相结合,可以在等待解剖病理结果的同时提供有价值的诊断信息。材料与方法:回顾性分析196例淋巴结标本的年龄、性别、LNC、FC、正电子发射断层扫描、淋巴细胞增多、白细胞增多、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平、血红蛋白等参数。我们构建了5个多变量模型来预测淋巴瘤的侵袭性,这些模型是由解剖病理诊断来定义的。前三个是基于两个(模型1)、四个(模型2)和多达16个自变量(模型3)的逻辑回归模型。最后两个模型分别基于集成学习算法bagging(模型4)和boosting(模型5)。经过10次交叉验证后,比较了这5种模型的性能,评估了灵敏度、特异性和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)等指标。结果:与与淋巴瘤侵袭性相关的个体变量(auc从0.69到0.87)相比,多变量模型获得了更好的auc,范围从0.88到0.94。最佳模型(模型5)的敏感性和特异性分别为77%和94%。结论:LNC、FC和其他可快速获得的参数与淋巴瘤的侵袭性有关。将它们结合在多变量模型中可以获得有价值的诊断信息并及时开始治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of Lymphoma Aggressiveness Using Machine Learning Algorithms

Introduction

Lymph nodes are essential to diagnose lymphoid neoplasms, metastases, and infections. Some lymphomas, particularly aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), need urgent diagnosis. Combining lymph node cytology (LNC) and flow cytometry (FC) with other rapidly available parameters through multivariable predictive models could offer valuable diagnostic information while waiting for anatomopathological results.

Materials and Methods

Results of 196 lymph node specimens were retrospectively analyzed for parameters like age, sex, LNC, FC, positron emission tomography scan, lymphocytosis, leukocytosis, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, and hemoglobin. We constructed five multivariable models predicting the aggressive nature of lymphoma as defined by the anatomopathological diagnostic. The first three were logistic regression models based on two (model 1), four (model 2), and up to 16 independent variables (model 3). The last two models were based on ensemble learning algorithms, bagging (model 4) and boosting (model 5), respectively. The performance of these five models was compared after 10-fold cross-validation, evaluating metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results

Compared to individual variables associated with the aggressive nature of the lymphoma (AUCs from 0.69 to 0.87), the multivariable models achieved better AUCs, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94. The best model (model 5) achieved a sensitivity and a specificity of 77% and 94%, respectively.

Conclusion

LNC, FC, and other rapidly available parameters are associated with the aggressive nature of the lymphomas. It is possible to combine them in multivariable models to obtain a valuable diagnostic information and to initiate a prompt treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
211
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology provides a forum for the communication of new developments, research topics and the practice of laboratory haematology. The journal publishes invited reviews, full length original articles, and correspondence. The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology is the official journal of the International Society for Laboratory Hematology, which addresses the following sub-disciplines: cellular analysis, flow cytometry, haemostasis and thrombosis, molecular diagnostics, haematology informatics, haemoglobinopathies, point of care testing, standards and guidelines. The journal was launched in 2006 as the successor to Clinical and Laboratory Hematology, which was first published in 1979. An active and positive editorial policy ensures that work of a high scientific standard is reported, in order to bridge the gap between practical and academic aspects of laboratory haematology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信