Julien Cabo, Benoît Bihin, Nicolas Debortoli, Virginie Lepage, Reza Soleimani, Rhita Bennis, Julien Favresse, Thierry Vander Borght, Carlos Graux, Caroline Fervaille, Jonathan Degosserie, Marie Pouplard, François Mullier
{"title":"使用机器学习算法预测淋巴瘤侵袭性。","authors":"Julien Cabo, Benoît Bihin, Nicolas Debortoli, Virginie Lepage, Reza Soleimani, Rhita Bennis, Julien Favresse, Thierry Vander Borght, Carlos Graux, Caroline Fervaille, Jonathan Degosserie, Marie Pouplard, François Mullier","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.14474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Lymph nodes are essential to diagnose lymphoid neoplasms, metastases, and infections. Some lymphomas, particularly aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), need urgent diagnosis. Combining lymph node cytology (LNC) and flow cytometry (FC) with other rapidly available parameters through multivariable predictive models could offer valuable diagnostic information while waiting for anatomopathological results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Results of 196 lymph node specimens were retrospectively analyzed for parameters like age, sex, LNC, FC, positron emission tomography scan, lymphocytosis, leukocytosis, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, and hemoglobin. We constructed five multivariable models predicting the aggressive nature of lymphoma as defined by the anatomopathological diagnostic. The first three were logistic regression models based on two (model 1), four (model 2), and up to 16 independent variables (model 3). The last two models were based on ensemble learning algorithms, bagging (model 4) and boosting (model 5), respectively. The performance of these five models was compared after 10-fold cross-validation, evaluating metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Compared to individual variables associated with the aggressive nature of the lymphoma (AUCs from 0.69 to 0.87), the multivariable models achieved better AUCs, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94. The best model (model 5) achieved a sensitivity and a specificity of 77% and 94%, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>LNC, FC, and other rapidly available parameters are associated with the aggressive nature of the lymphomas. It is possible to combine them in multivariable models to obtain a valuable diagnostic information and to initiate a prompt treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14120,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","volume":"47 5","pages":"859-868"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of Lymphoma Aggressiveness Using Machine Learning Algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Julien Cabo, Benoît Bihin, Nicolas Debortoli, Virginie Lepage, Reza Soleimani, Rhita Bennis, Julien Favresse, Thierry Vander Borght, Carlos Graux, Caroline Fervaille, Jonathan Degosserie, Marie Pouplard, François Mullier\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijlh.14474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Lymph nodes are essential to diagnose lymphoid neoplasms, metastases, and infections. Some lymphomas, particularly aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), need urgent diagnosis. Combining lymph node cytology (LNC) and flow cytometry (FC) with other rapidly available parameters through multivariable predictive models could offer valuable diagnostic information while waiting for anatomopathological results.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Results of 196 lymph node specimens were retrospectively analyzed for parameters like age, sex, LNC, FC, positron emission tomography scan, lymphocytosis, leukocytosis, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, and hemoglobin. We constructed five multivariable models predicting the aggressive nature of lymphoma as defined by the anatomopathological diagnostic. The first three were logistic regression models based on two (model 1), four (model 2), and up to 16 independent variables (model 3). The last two models were based on ensemble learning algorithms, bagging (model 4) and boosting (model 5), respectively. The performance of these five models was compared after 10-fold cross-validation, evaluating metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Compared to individual variables associated with the aggressive nature of the lymphoma (AUCs from 0.69 to 0.87), the multivariable models achieved better AUCs, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94. The best model (model 5) achieved a sensitivity and a specificity of 77% and 94%, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>LNC, FC, and other rapidly available parameters are associated with the aggressive nature of the lymphomas. It is possible to combine them in multivariable models to obtain a valuable diagnostic information and to initiate a prompt treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology\",\"volume\":\"47 5\",\"pages\":\"859-868\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijlh.14474\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijlh.14474","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prediction of Lymphoma Aggressiveness Using Machine Learning Algorithms
Introduction
Lymph nodes are essential to diagnose lymphoid neoplasms, metastases, and infections. Some lymphomas, particularly aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), need urgent diagnosis. Combining lymph node cytology (LNC) and flow cytometry (FC) with other rapidly available parameters through multivariable predictive models could offer valuable diagnostic information while waiting for anatomopathological results.
Materials and Methods
Results of 196 lymph node specimens were retrospectively analyzed for parameters like age, sex, LNC, FC, positron emission tomography scan, lymphocytosis, leukocytosis, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, and hemoglobin. We constructed five multivariable models predicting the aggressive nature of lymphoma as defined by the anatomopathological diagnostic. The first three were logistic regression models based on two (model 1), four (model 2), and up to 16 independent variables (model 3). The last two models were based on ensemble learning algorithms, bagging (model 4) and boosting (model 5), respectively. The performance of these five models was compared after 10-fold cross-validation, evaluating metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
Results
Compared to individual variables associated with the aggressive nature of the lymphoma (AUCs from 0.69 to 0.87), the multivariable models achieved better AUCs, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94. The best model (model 5) achieved a sensitivity and a specificity of 77% and 94%, respectively.
Conclusion
LNC, FC, and other rapidly available parameters are associated with the aggressive nature of the lymphomas. It is possible to combine them in multivariable models to obtain a valuable diagnostic information and to initiate a prompt treatment.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology provides a forum for the communication of new developments, research topics and the practice of laboratory haematology.
The journal publishes invited reviews, full length original articles, and correspondence.
The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology is the official journal of the International Society for Laboratory Hematology, which addresses the following sub-disciplines: cellular analysis, flow cytometry, haemostasis and thrombosis, molecular diagnostics, haematology informatics, haemoglobinopathies, point of care testing, standards and guidelines.
The journal was launched in 2006 as the successor to Clinical and Laboratory Hematology, which was first published in 1979. An active and positive editorial policy ensures that work of a high scientific standard is reported, in order to bridge the gap between practical and academic aspects of laboratory haematology.