Amit Kumar, Mamta Kaushik, Neha Mehra, Neha Verma, Tripti Rathore
{"title":"根管预备时根尖直径和器械锥度对根尖碎片挤压的影响:一项体外研究。","authors":"Amit Kumar, Mamta Kaushik, Neha Mehra, Neha Verma, Tripti Rathore","doi":"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_14_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Apical debris extrusion can result in complications leading to unfavorable clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This <i>in vitro</i> study aimed to ascertain the influence of apical size and variation of instrument taper on the apical extrusion of debris.</p><p><strong>Setting and design: </strong>Forty roots from sixty recently extracted human permanent mandibular molars were selected. The apical diameter was measured using an image analysis program and divided into two groups: mesial roots for narrower canals (N) (<i>n</i> = 20) and distal roots for wider canals (W) (<i>n</i> = 20). These were further subdivided based on preparation size and instrument taper as #25/0.04 and #25/0.06 for narrower and #30/0.04 and #30/0.06 for wider canals.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The canals were prepared using Hero Shapers, with double distilled water as irrigant. The extruded debris was collected using the Myers and Montgomery method.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>The mean weight of extruded debris was analyzed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The Mann-Whitney test compared the differences in the weight of debris between different tapers and different canal widths. The level of significance was set at <i>P</i> ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Narrow canals prepared using #25/0.06 showed significantly more debris extrusion when compared to #25/0.04 (<i>P</i> = 0.017). Wider canals, when instrumented with a #30/0.04, had more extrusion of debris than #30/0.06. However, the difference between 0.04 and 0.06 taper was not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The apical diameter and instrument taper are essential factors to be considered to minimize debris extrusion. Narrower diameter, when instrumented with greater taper, exhibited more apical debris extrusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":516842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","volume":"28 3","pages":"279-284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12007744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of apical diameter and instrument taper on apical debris extrusion during root canal instrumentation: An <i>in vitro</i> study.\",\"authors\":\"Amit Kumar, Mamta Kaushik, Neha Mehra, Neha Verma, Tripti Rathore\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_14_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Apical debris extrusion can result in complications leading to unfavorable clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This <i>in vitro</i> study aimed to ascertain the influence of apical size and variation of instrument taper on the apical extrusion of debris.</p><p><strong>Setting and design: </strong>Forty roots from sixty recently extracted human permanent mandibular molars were selected. The apical diameter was measured using an image analysis program and divided into two groups: mesial roots for narrower canals (N) (<i>n</i> = 20) and distal roots for wider canals (W) (<i>n</i> = 20). These were further subdivided based on preparation size and instrument taper as #25/0.04 and #25/0.06 for narrower and #30/0.04 and #30/0.06 for wider canals.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The canals were prepared using Hero Shapers, with double distilled water as irrigant. The extruded debris was collected using the Myers and Montgomery method.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>The mean weight of extruded debris was analyzed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The Mann-Whitney test compared the differences in the weight of debris between different tapers and different canal widths. The level of significance was set at <i>P</i> ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Narrow canals prepared using #25/0.06 showed significantly more debris extrusion when compared to #25/0.04 (<i>P</i> = 0.017). Wider canals, when instrumented with a #30/0.04, had more extrusion of debris than #30/0.06. However, the difference between 0.04 and 0.06 taper was not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The apical diameter and instrument taper are essential factors to be considered to minimize debris extrusion. Narrower diameter, when instrumented with greater taper, exhibited more apical debris extrusion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"279-284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12007744/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_14_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_14_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Influence of apical diameter and instrument taper on apical debris extrusion during root canal instrumentation: An in vitro study.
Context: Apical debris extrusion can result in complications leading to unfavorable clinical outcomes.
Aim: This in vitro study aimed to ascertain the influence of apical size and variation of instrument taper on the apical extrusion of debris.
Setting and design: Forty roots from sixty recently extracted human permanent mandibular molars were selected. The apical diameter was measured using an image analysis program and divided into two groups: mesial roots for narrower canals (N) (n = 20) and distal roots for wider canals (W) (n = 20). These were further subdivided based on preparation size and instrument taper as #25/0.04 and #25/0.06 for narrower and #30/0.04 and #30/0.06 for wider canals.
Materials and methods: The canals were prepared using Hero Shapers, with double distilled water as irrigant. The extruded debris was collected using the Myers and Montgomery method.
Statistical analysis used: The mean weight of extruded debris was analyzed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The Mann-Whitney test compared the differences in the weight of debris between different tapers and different canal widths. The level of significance was set at P ≤ 0.05.
Results: Narrow canals prepared using #25/0.06 showed significantly more debris extrusion when compared to #25/0.04 (P = 0.017). Wider canals, when instrumented with a #30/0.04, had more extrusion of debris than #30/0.06. However, the difference between 0.04 and 0.06 taper was not significant.
Conclusion: The apical diameter and instrument taper are essential factors to be considered to minimize debris extrusion. Narrower diameter, when instrumented with greater taper, exhibited more apical debris extrusion.