次氯酸钠脱釉对陶瓷支架粘结强度的影响。

Brazilian dental journal Pub Date : 2025-04-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0103-644020256106
Priscila Cordeiro, José Guilherme Neves, Midori Tsuzuki, Anália Gabriela Ferraz Facury, Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho, Ana Rosa Costa
{"title":"次氯酸钠脱釉对陶瓷支架粘结强度的影响。","authors":"Priscila Cordeiro, José Guilherme Neves, Midori Tsuzuki, Anália Gabriela Ferraz Facury, Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho, Ana Rosa Costa","doi":"10.1590/0103-644020256106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To assess the efficiency of different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) on the bonding of ceramic brackets to dental enamel using different bonding protocols. Ceramic, a polycrystalline bracket, was bonded to 90 extracted bovine incisors using primer + Transbond XT (P+TXT); Optibond S adhesive + Transbond XT (OS+TXT), and OS + Orthocem (OS+OC). Three concentrations of NaOCl (0%, 2.5%, and 5.25%) were used for each material, resulting in nine experimental groups (n=10). The shear bond strength (SBS) assay was performed on a universal testing machine. The surface morphology of the enamel and tooth/bonding material interface was examined under a scanning electron microscope. Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests were performed to compare the non-parametric data (ARI scores). SBS data were analyzed using a generalized linear model. All analyses were performed using the R program and with a significance level of 5%. No significant differences in SBS between the groups with different concentrations of NaOCl (p>0.05). OS+OC group yielded the lowest bond strength values (3.35 MPa_0%, 4.90 MPa_2.5%, 4.68 MPa_5.25%) compared to the other groups, regardless of NaOCl (p<0.05). No significant difference between the materials regarding the ARI score (p>0.05). OS+TXT-5.25% showed significantly higher scores (14.4 MPa) than OS+TXT-2.5% (9.17 MPa) (p<0.05). The surface morphology analysis revealed a change in the etching pattern for types 1 and 2 when NaOCl was used. The different concentrations of NaOCl previously applied onto the enamel surface did not enhance bond strength. OS+OC should not be recommended for bonding with fixed ceramic orthodontic devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":101363,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"36 ","pages":"e246106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11996157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enamel Deproteinization with Sodium Hypochlorite: Effects on Ceramic Bracket Bond Strength.\",\"authors\":\"Priscila Cordeiro, José Guilherme Neves, Midori Tsuzuki, Anália Gabriela Ferraz Facury, Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho, Ana Rosa Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0103-644020256106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To assess the efficiency of different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) on the bonding of ceramic brackets to dental enamel using different bonding protocols. Ceramic, a polycrystalline bracket, was bonded to 90 extracted bovine incisors using primer + Transbond XT (P+TXT); Optibond S adhesive + Transbond XT (OS+TXT), and OS + Orthocem (OS+OC). Three concentrations of NaOCl (0%, 2.5%, and 5.25%) were used for each material, resulting in nine experimental groups (n=10). The shear bond strength (SBS) assay was performed on a universal testing machine. The surface morphology of the enamel and tooth/bonding material interface was examined under a scanning electron microscope. Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests were performed to compare the non-parametric data (ARI scores). SBS data were analyzed using a generalized linear model. All analyses were performed using the R program and with a significance level of 5%. No significant differences in SBS between the groups with different concentrations of NaOCl (p>0.05). OS+OC group yielded the lowest bond strength values (3.35 MPa_0%, 4.90 MPa_2.5%, 4.68 MPa_5.25%) compared to the other groups, regardless of NaOCl (p<0.05). No significant difference between the materials regarding the ARI score (p>0.05). OS+TXT-5.25% showed significantly higher scores (14.4 MPa) than OS+TXT-2.5% (9.17 MPa) (p<0.05). The surface morphology analysis revealed a change in the etching pattern for types 1 and 2 when NaOCl was used. The different concentrations of NaOCl previously applied onto the enamel surface did not enhance bond strength. OS+OC should not be recommended for bonding with fixed ceramic orthodontic devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"volume\":\"36 \",\"pages\":\"e246106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11996157/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-644020256106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-644020256106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究不同浓度的次氯酸钠(NaOCl)对牙釉质瓷托槽的结合效果。采用引物+跨键XT (P+TXT)将陶瓷(多晶托架)粘接在90个提取的牛门牙上;Optibond S胶粘剂+ Transbond XT (OS+TXT), OS+ Orthocem (OS+OC)。每种材料采用三种NaOCl浓度(0%、2.5%和5.25%),共9个实验组(n=10)。剪切结合强度(SBS)测定在通用试验机上进行。在扫描电镜下观察牙釉质与牙/粘接材料界面的表面形貌。采用Kruskal-Wallis和Dunn检验比较非参数数据(ARI评分)。SBS数据采用广义线性模型进行分析。所有分析均使用R程序进行,显著性水平为5%。不同NaOCl浓度组间SBS无显著差异(p < 0.05)。与NaOCl无关,OS+OC组的结合强度值最低(3.35 MPa_0%, 4.90 MPa_2.5%, 4.68 MPa_5.25%)。OS+TXT-5.25%组的评分(14.4 MPa)显著高于OS+TXT-2.5%组(9.17 MPa)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enamel Deproteinization with Sodium Hypochlorite: Effects on Ceramic Bracket Bond Strength.

To assess the efficiency of different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) on the bonding of ceramic brackets to dental enamel using different bonding protocols. Ceramic, a polycrystalline bracket, was bonded to 90 extracted bovine incisors using primer + Transbond XT (P+TXT); Optibond S adhesive + Transbond XT (OS+TXT), and OS + Orthocem (OS+OC). Three concentrations of NaOCl (0%, 2.5%, and 5.25%) were used for each material, resulting in nine experimental groups (n=10). The shear bond strength (SBS) assay was performed on a universal testing machine. The surface morphology of the enamel and tooth/bonding material interface was examined under a scanning electron microscope. Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests were performed to compare the non-parametric data (ARI scores). SBS data were analyzed using a generalized linear model. All analyses were performed using the R program and with a significance level of 5%. No significant differences in SBS between the groups with different concentrations of NaOCl (p>0.05). OS+OC group yielded the lowest bond strength values (3.35 MPa_0%, 4.90 MPa_2.5%, 4.68 MPa_5.25%) compared to the other groups, regardless of NaOCl (p<0.05). No significant difference between the materials regarding the ARI score (p>0.05). OS+TXT-5.25% showed significantly higher scores (14.4 MPa) than OS+TXT-2.5% (9.17 MPa) (p<0.05). The surface morphology analysis revealed a change in the etching pattern for types 1 and 2 when NaOCl was used. The different concentrations of NaOCl previously applied onto the enamel surface did not enhance bond strength. OS+OC should not be recommended for bonding with fixed ceramic orthodontic devices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信