自杀预防的比较见解:英国地方当局审计报告和行动计划的横断面分析。

Saarah Khalid, Sivapriya K R Sundararajan, Libby Kelsey, Stephen Gunther, Padmanabhan Badrinath
{"title":"自杀预防的比较见解:英国地方当局审计报告和行动计划的横断面分析。","authors":"Saarah Khalid, Sivapriya K R Sundararajan, Libby Kelsey, Stephen Gunther, Padmanabhan Badrinath","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdaf042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suicide rates in the UK are rising, highlighting the need for effective local interventions. This study examined whether English local authorities (LAs) have conducted suicide audits, key findings and whether these were used to develop their action plans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study assessed suicide audits and action plans from 153 LAs, using data collected from Freedom of Information requests, using statistical (Chi-square test) and thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 153 LAs, 8 did not respond. Of the remaining 145 LAs, 60% conducted audits. Data from 88 suicide audits and 113 action plans were analysed. Males between 45 and 64 years old were found to have the highest incidence of suicide; coastal LAs reported significantly higher suicide rates than the national average (P = .009). Locations (60.2%) and methods of suicide (62.5%) were recognized as key factors for intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The aim and scope of suicide audits and action plans vary significantly. Identified risk factors were higher in coastal LAs, and support for men remains inadequate. Standardized guidelines could improve the impact and consistency of data collection and assist in the development of robust strategies to tackle suicide prevention initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":94107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative insights into suicide prevention: a cross-sectional analysis of English local authority audit reports and action plans.\",\"authors\":\"Saarah Khalid, Sivapriya K R Sundararajan, Libby Kelsey, Stephen Gunther, Padmanabhan Badrinath\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/pubmed/fdaf042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suicide rates in the UK are rising, highlighting the need for effective local interventions. This study examined whether English local authorities (LAs) have conducted suicide audits, key findings and whether these were used to develop their action plans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study assessed suicide audits and action plans from 153 LAs, using data collected from Freedom of Information requests, using statistical (Chi-square test) and thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 153 LAs, 8 did not respond. Of the remaining 145 LAs, 60% conducted audits. Data from 88 suicide audits and 113 action plans were analysed. Males between 45 and 64 years old were found to have the highest incidence of suicide; coastal LAs reported significantly higher suicide rates than the national average (P = .009). Locations (60.2%) and methods of suicide (62.5%) were recognized as key factors for intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The aim and scope of suicide audits and action plans vary significantly. Identified risk factors were higher in coastal LAs, and support for men remains inadequate. Standardized guidelines could improve the impact and consistency of data collection and assist in the development of robust strategies to tackle suicide prevention initiatives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaf042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaf042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:英国的自杀率正在上升,这凸显了有效的地方干预的必要性。这项研究调查了英国地方当局(LAs)是否进行了自杀审计,主要调查结果以及这些调查结果是否用于制定行动计划。方法:本横断面研究采用统计(卡方检验)和专题分析方法,对153个自杀审计和行动计划进行评估。结果:153例LAs中,8例无应答。在余下的145个法律援助机构中,60%进行了审计。研究人员分析了88项自杀审计和113项行动计划的数据。45至64岁的男性自杀率最高;沿海地区的自杀率明显高于全国平均水平(P = 0.009)。自杀地点(60.2%)和自杀方式(62.5%)被认为是干预的关键因素。结论:自杀审计和行动计划的目的和范围差异显著。沿海地区已确定的危险因素较高,对男性的支持仍然不足。标准化的指导方针可以提高数据收集的影响和一致性,并有助于制定强有力的战略来应对预防自杀行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative insights into suicide prevention: a cross-sectional analysis of English local authority audit reports and action plans.

Background: Suicide rates in the UK are rising, highlighting the need for effective local interventions. This study examined whether English local authorities (LAs) have conducted suicide audits, key findings and whether these were used to develop their action plans.

Methods: This cross-sectional study assessed suicide audits and action plans from 153 LAs, using data collected from Freedom of Information requests, using statistical (Chi-square test) and thematic analysis.

Results: Of 153 LAs, 8 did not respond. Of the remaining 145 LAs, 60% conducted audits. Data from 88 suicide audits and 113 action plans were analysed. Males between 45 and 64 years old were found to have the highest incidence of suicide; coastal LAs reported significantly higher suicide rates than the national average (P = .009). Locations (60.2%) and methods of suicide (62.5%) were recognized as key factors for intervention.

Conclusions: The aim and scope of suicide audits and action plans vary significantly. Identified risk factors were higher in coastal LAs, and support for men remains inadequate. Standardized guidelines could improve the impact and consistency of data collection and assist in the development of robust strategies to tackle suicide prevention initiatives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信