整合药物警戒和反应小组以更好地报告和管理药物不良反应:来自前瞻性横断面研究的见解。

IF 2
Vinodkumar Mugada, Satya Sai Srinivas Allada, Chaitanya Rvs Koppala, Srinivasa Rao Yarguntla
{"title":"整合药物警戒和反应小组以更好地报告和管理药物不良反应:来自前瞻性横断面研究的见解。","authors":"Vinodkumar Mugada, Satya Sai Srinivas Allada, Chaitanya Rvs Koppala, Srinivasa Rao Yarguntla","doi":"10.4274/tjps.galenos.2025.44902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The multidisciplinary team approach improves adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting and management. Our study aims to integrate a pharmacovigilance (PV) and Response Team within the general medicine department to improve ADR reporting and management.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study for seven months in four general medicine wards. We proposed a PV and response unit team (PRUT), comprising a nursing student, and a Doctor of Pharmacy (intern). After the team received interventional educational training, we integrated them with the physician and head nurse of each general medicine inpatient ward. We then evaluated the effectiveness of the team in ADR reporting and management using a feedback survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, comorbidities (30.69%) and polypharmacy (≥5 drugs) (26.25%) were major predisposing factors. Among drug-related problems in 125 patients, inappropriate drug use (28.80%) and unclear dose timing (21.60%) were predominant. Gastrointestinal disorders were common (44.73%), with dose adjustment being the top management strategy (36.84%). Over 71% supported the PRUT for improving patient safety and reducing medication errors, noting high effectiveness in consultation (85.92%) and in reducing the ADR reporting burden (87.32%). There is a statistically significant association between the level of agreement on the effectiveness of PRUT among healthcare professionals (p<0.01). Most healthcare professionals agreed on PRUT's effectiveness without any reports of low agreement levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PRUT effectively reported and managed ADRs. A multidisciplinary approach improves ADR reporting and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":101423,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences","volume":"22 2","pages":"83-90"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080291/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating a Pharmacovigilance and Response Unit Team for a Better Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting and Management: Insights from a Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Vinodkumar Mugada, Satya Sai Srinivas Allada, Chaitanya Rvs Koppala, Srinivasa Rao Yarguntla\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/tjps.galenos.2025.44902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The multidisciplinary team approach improves adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting and management. Our study aims to integrate a pharmacovigilance (PV) and Response Team within the general medicine department to improve ADR reporting and management.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study for seven months in four general medicine wards. We proposed a PV and response unit team (PRUT), comprising a nursing student, and a Doctor of Pharmacy (intern). After the team received interventional educational training, we integrated them with the physician and head nurse of each general medicine inpatient ward. We then evaluated the effectiveness of the team in ADR reporting and management using a feedback survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, comorbidities (30.69%) and polypharmacy (≥5 drugs) (26.25%) were major predisposing factors. Among drug-related problems in 125 patients, inappropriate drug use (28.80%) and unclear dose timing (21.60%) were predominant. Gastrointestinal disorders were common (44.73%), with dose adjustment being the top management strategy (36.84%). Over 71% supported the PRUT for improving patient safety and reducing medication errors, noting high effectiveness in consultation (85.92%) and in reducing the ADR reporting burden (87.32%). There is a statistically significant association between the level of agreement on the effectiveness of PRUT among healthcare professionals (p<0.01). Most healthcare professionals agreed on PRUT's effectiveness without any reports of low agreement levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PRUT effectively reported and managed ADRs. A multidisciplinary approach improves ADR reporting and management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"83-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080291/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjps.galenos.2025.44902\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjps.galenos.2025.44902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:多学科团队的方法提高药物不良反应(ADR)的报告和管理。我们的研究旨在整合综合医学部的药物警戒和反应小组,以改善不良反应的报告和管理。材料和方法:我们在4个普通内科病房进行了为期7个月的前瞻性横断面研究。我们提出了一个PV和响应单元小组(PRUT),由一名护理学生和一名药学博士(实习生)组成。在团队接受介入教育培训后,我们将他们与每个普通内科住院病房的医师和护士长进行整合。然后,我们通过反馈调查评估了该团队在ADR报告和管理方面的有效性。结果:本研究中,合并症(30.69%)和多药(≥5种药物)(26.25%)是主要的易感因素。125例患者的药物相关问题以用药不当(28.80%)和给药时机不清(21.60%)为主。胃肠道疾病最为常见(44.73%),调整剂量是最主要的管理策略(36.84%)。超过71%的人支持PRUT改善患者安全和减少用药错误,并注意到咨询(85.92%)和减少ADR报告负担(87.32%)的高效率。医疗保健专业人员对PRUT有效性的认同程度之间存在统计学意义上的显著关联(p结论:PRUT有效地报告和管理了adr。多学科方法可改善不良反应报告和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating a Pharmacovigilance and Response Unit Team for a Better Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting and Management: Insights from a Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Objectives: The multidisciplinary team approach improves adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting and management. Our study aims to integrate a pharmacovigilance (PV) and Response Team within the general medicine department to improve ADR reporting and management.

Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study for seven months in four general medicine wards. We proposed a PV and response unit team (PRUT), comprising a nursing student, and a Doctor of Pharmacy (intern). After the team received interventional educational training, we integrated them with the physician and head nurse of each general medicine inpatient ward. We then evaluated the effectiveness of the team in ADR reporting and management using a feedback survey.

Results: In this study, comorbidities (30.69%) and polypharmacy (≥5 drugs) (26.25%) were major predisposing factors. Among drug-related problems in 125 patients, inappropriate drug use (28.80%) and unclear dose timing (21.60%) were predominant. Gastrointestinal disorders were common (44.73%), with dose adjustment being the top management strategy (36.84%). Over 71% supported the PRUT for improving patient safety and reducing medication errors, noting high effectiveness in consultation (85.92%) and in reducing the ADR reporting burden (87.32%). There is a statistically significant association between the level of agreement on the effectiveness of PRUT among healthcare professionals (p<0.01). Most healthcare professionals agreed on PRUT's effectiveness without any reports of low agreement levels.

Conclusion: The PRUT effectively reported and managed ADRs. A multidisciplinary approach improves ADR reporting and management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信