GPT-4V(视觉)和gpt - 40在眼科中的图像识别性能:图像在临床问题中的应用。

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-05-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S494480
Kosei Tomita, Takashi Nishida, Yoshiyuki Kitaguchi, Koji Kitazawa, Masahiro Miyake
{"title":"GPT-4V(视觉)和gpt - 40在眼科中的图像识别性能:图像在临床问题中的应用。","authors":"Kosei Tomita, Takashi Nishida, Yoshiyuki Kitaguchi, Koji Kitazawa, Masahiro Miyake","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S494480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the diagnostic accuracy of Generative Pre-trained Transformer with Vision (GPT)-4, GPT-4 with Vision (GPT-4V), and GPT-4o for clinical questions in ophthalmology.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The questions were collected from the \"Diagnosis This\" section on the American Academy of Ophthalmology website. We tested 580 questions and presented ChatGPT with the same questions under two conditions: 1) multimodal model, incorporating both the question text and associated images, and 2) text-only model. We then compared the difference in accuracy using McNemar tests among multimodal (GPT-4o and GPT-4V) and text-only (GPT-4V) models. The percentage of general correct answers was also collected from the website.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multimodal GPT-4o performed the best accuracy (77.1%), followed by multimodal GPT-4V (71.0%), and then text-only GPT-4V (68.7%); (P values < 0.001, 0.012, and 0.001, respectively). All GPT-4 models showed higher accuracy than the general correct answers on the website (64.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of information from images enhances the performance of GPT-4V in diagnosing clinical questions in ophthalmology. This suggests that integrating multimodal data could be crucial in developing more effective and reliable diagnostic tools in medical fields.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"1557-1564"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12068282/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Image Recognition Performance of GPT-4V(ision) and GPT-4o in Ophthalmology: Use of Images in Clinical Questions.\",\"authors\":\"Kosei Tomita, Takashi Nishida, Yoshiyuki Kitaguchi, Koji Kitazawa, Masahiro Miyake\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTH.S494480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the diagnostic accuracy of Generative Pre-trained Transformer with Vision (GPT)-4, GPT-4 with Vision (GPT-4V), and GPT-4o for clinical questions in ophthalmology.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The questions were collected from the \\\"Diagnosis This\\\" section on the American Academy of Ophthalmology website. We tested 580 questions and presented ChatGPT with the same questions under two conditions: 1) multimodal model, incorporating both the question text and associated images, and 2) text-only model. We then compared the difference in accuracy using McNemar tests among multimodal (GPT-4o and GPT-4V) and text-only (GPT-4V) models. The percentage of general correct answers was also collected from the website.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multimodal GPT-4o performed the best accuracy (77.1%), followed by multimodal GPT-4V (71.0%), and then text-only GPT-4V (68.7%); (P values < 0.001, 0.012, and 0.001, respectively). All GPT-4 models showed higher accuracy than the general correct answers on the website (64.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of information from images enhances the performance of GPT-4V in diagnosing clinical questions in ophthalmology. This suggests that integrating multimodal data could be crucial in developing more effective and reliable diagnostic tools in medical fields.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"1557-1564\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12068282/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S494480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S494480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较GPT-4、GPT-4和GPT- 40对眼科临床问题的诊断准确性。患者和方法:这些问题收集自美国眼科学会网站的“诊断”部分。我们测试了580个问题,并在两种情况下将相同的问题呈现给ChatGPT: 1)多模态模型,同时包含问题文本和相关图像,以及2)纯文本模型。然后,我们使用McNemar测试比较了多模态(gpt - 40和GPT-4V)和纯文本(GPT-4V)模型的准确性差异。一般正确答案的百分比也从网站上收集。结果:多模态gpt - 40的准确率最高(77.1%),其次是多模态GPT-4V(71.0%),最后是纯文本GPT-4V (68.7%);(P值分别< 0.001、0.012和0.001)。所有GPT-4模型的准确率都高于网站上的一般正确答案(64.6%)。结论:图像信息的加入提高了GPT-4V对眼科临床问题的诊断能力。这表明,整合多模式数据对于在医疗领域开发更有效和可靠的诊断工具至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Image Recognition Performance of GPT-4V(ision) and GPT-4o in Ophthalmology: Use of Images in Clinical Questions.

Purpose: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of Generative Pre-trained Transformer with Vision (GPT)-4, GPT-4 with Vision (GPT-4V), and GPT-4o for clinical questions in ophthalmology.

Patients and methods: The questions were collected from the "Diagnosis This" section on the American Academy of Ophthalmology website. We tested 580 questions and presented ChatGPT with the same questions under two conditions: 1) multimodal model, incorporating both the question text and associated images, and 2) text-only model. We then compared the difference in accuracy using McNemar tests among multimodal (GPT-4o and GPT-4V) and text-only (GPT-4V) models. The percentage of general correct answers was also collected from the website.

Results: Multimodal GPT-4o performed the best accuracy (77.1%), followed by multimodal GPT-4V (71.0%), and then text-only GPT-4V (68.7%); (P values < 0.001, 0.012, and 0.001, respectively). All GPT-4 models showed higher accuracy than the general correct answers on the website (64.6%).

Conclusion: The addition of information from images enhances the performance of GPT-4V in diagnosing clinical questions in ophthalmology. This suggests that integrating multimodal data could be crucial in developing more effective and reliable diagnostic tools in medical fields.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信