超声特征预测≤40岁年轻女性交界性卵巢肿瘤的Logistic回归分析。

Wei Lian Feng, Xiu Jing Xie, Jian Jiang, Tian An Jiang
{"title":"超声特征预测≤40岁年轻女性交界性卵巢肿瘤的Logistic回归分析。","authors":"Wei Lian Feng, Xiu Jing Xie, Jian Jiang, Tian An Jiang","doi":"10.5603/gpl.99589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the ability of sonographic characteristics to distinguish borderline ovarian tumours (BOT) from benign and malignant tumours in young women by using logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>147 patients with ovarian masses were analysed retrospectively. We recorded and compared the available preoperative serum CA125 and CA199 levels, ultrasound and pathological findings from patient records to distinguish BOT from benign and malignant tumours using single-factor and multiple stepwise logistic regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-six women aged ≤ 40 years diagnosed with BOT, 31 women with malignant tumours, and 40 women with benign cystadenomas were included. The significant features identified in the single-factor analysis were CA125 and CA199 levels, tumour size, multilocularity, presence of solid components within cysts, colour Doppler flow, presence of microcystic pattern (MCP), and proportion of the maximum solid area covering < 50% of the inner surface within the cyst (p < 0.05). The latter two ultrasound features were identified as independent predictors for differentiating BOT from benign and malignant tumours in the logistic regression analysis. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was 0.893 and 0.904, respectively. The corresponding sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 84.2%, 89.5%, 94.1%, and 73.9%, respectively, while the corresponding values were 93.4%, 76.3%, 88.7%, and 85.3%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining both ultrasonic features of the microcystic pattern and the proportion of the maximum solid area covering < 50% of the inner surface within the cystic region appears to be the optimal method for characterizing BOT.</p>","PeriodicalId":94021,"journal":{"name":"Ginekologia polska","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Logistic regression analysis of ultrasound features for predicting borderline ovarian tumours in young women aged ≤ 40 year.\",\"authors\":\"Wei Lian Feng, Xiu Jing Xie, Jian Jiang, Tian An Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/gpl.99589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the ability of sonographic characteristics to distinguish borderline ovarian tumours (BOT) from benign and malignant tumours in young women by using logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>147 patients with ovarian masses were analysed retrospectively. We recorded and compared the available preoperative serum CA125 and CA199 levels, ultrasound and pathological findings from patient records to distinguish BOT from benign and malignant tumours using single-factor and multiple stepwise logistic regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-six women aged ≤ 40 years diagnosed with BOT, 31 women with malignant tumours, and 40 women with benign cystadenomas were included. The significant features identified in the single-factor analysis were CA125 and CA199 levels, tumour size, multilocularity, presence of solid components within cysts, colour Doppler flow, presence of microcystic pattern (MCP), and proportion of the maximum solid area covering < 50% of the inner surface within the cyst (p < 0.05). The latter two ultrasound features were identified as independent predictors for differentiating BOT from benign and malignant tumours in the logistic regression analysis. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was 0.893 and 0.904, respectively. The corresponding sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 84.2%, 89.5%, 94.1%, and 73.9%, respectively, while the corresponding values were 93.4%, 76.3%, 88.7%, and 85.3%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining both ultrasonic features of the microcystic pattern and the proportion of the maximum solid area covering < 50% of the inner surface within the cystic region appears to be the optimal method for characterizing BOT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ginekologia polska\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ginekologia polska\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/gpl.99589\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ginekologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/gpl.99589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:应用logistic回归分析确定超声特征对年轻女性交界性卵巢肿瘤(BOT)与良恶性肿瘤的鉴别能力。材料与方法:回顾性分析147例卵巢肿块患者的临床资料。我们记录并比较术前血清CA125和CA199水平、超声和患者记录的病理结果,使用单因素和多元逐步logistic回归分析来区分BOT与良性和恶性肿瘤。结果:76名年龄≤40岁的女性被诊断为BOT, 31名女性患有恶性肿瘤,40名女性患有良性囊腺瘤。单因素分析中发现的重要特征是CA125和CA199水平、肿瘤大小、多房性、囊肿内实体成分的存在、彩色多普勒血流、微囊型(MCP)的存在以及囊肿内最大实体面积占内表面< 50%的比例(p < 0.05)。在logistic回归分析中,后两种超声特征被确定为区分BOT与良恶性肿瘤的独立预测因子。受试者工作曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.893和0.904。相应的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为84.2%、89.5%、94.1%、73.9%,对应值分别为93.4%、76.3%、88.7%、85.3%。结论:结合微囊型的超声特征和囊区内最大实区面积占内表面< 50%的比例是表征BOT的最佳方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Logistic regression analysis of ultrasound features for predicting borderline ovarian tumours in young women aged ≤ 40 year.

Objectives: To determine the ability of sonographic characteristics to distinguish borderline ovarian tumours (BOT) from benign and malignant tumours in young women by using logistic regression analysis.

Material and methods: 147 patients with ovarian masses were analysed retrospectively. We recorded and compared the available preoperative serum CA125 and CA199 levels, ultrasound and pathological findings from patient records to distinguish BOT from benign and malignant tumours using single-factor and multiple stepwise logistic regression analyses.

Results: Seventy-six women aged ≤ 40 years diagnosed with BOT, 31 women with malignant tumours, and 40 women with benign cystadenomas were included. The significant features identified in the single-factor analysis were CA125 and CA199 levels, tumour size, multilocularity, presence of solid components within cysts, colour Doppler flow, presence of microcystic pattern (MCP), and proportion of the maximum solid area covering < 50% of the inner surface within the cyst (p < 0.05). The latter two ultrasound features were identified as independent predictors for differentiating BOT from benign and malignant tumours in the logistic regression analysis. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was 0.893 and 0.904, respectively. The corresponding sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 84.2%, 89.5%, 94.1%, and 73.9%, respectively, while the corresponding values were 93.4%, 76.3%, 88.7%, and 85.3%, respectively.

Conclusions: Combining both ultrasonic features of the microcystic pattern and the proportion of the maximum solid area covering < 50% of the inner surface within the cystic region appears to be the optimal method for characterizing BOT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信