Samuel Thorburn, Sara Vogrin, Sarah Garner, Olivia Smibert, Gemma Reynolds, Jason Kwong, Jason A Trubiano, Abby P Douglas
{"title":"血液病患者潜在中心线相关血流感染(CLABSIs)的早期线切除和成功线保留的预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Samuel Thorburn, Sara Vogrin, Sarah Garner, Olivia Smibert, Gemma Reynolds, Jason Kwong, Jason A Trubiano, Abby P Douglas","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2025.04.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with haematologic malignancies are at risk of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) and their adverse outcomes. Line removal is often considered necessary for cure but creates substantial morbidity, and neutropenic patients often have alternative sources of bloodstream infection (BSI). Patients suitable for a line retention strategy remain ill-defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single centre retrospective cohort study of haematology inpatients who developed BSI with a central line in situ. Line retention was defined as line remaining in situ for ≥72 hours post BSI. The primary outcome was failure of line retention, defined as line removal >72 hours post BSI or recurrent BSI with the same organism within 3 months. Predictors of failure of line retention, early line removal (<72 hours) and IDSA central line related BSI (CRBSI) (research-definition CRBSI) were assessed using multivariable analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 288 episodes of BSI included between 1/1/2018 and 31/12/2022, 209 cases had retention of line >72 hours and 52 of these (24.9%) experienced failed line retention, with prolonged culture positivity predicting this outcome, and source of BSI other than the line associated with successful line retention on multivariate analysis. 79 (27.4%) had early line removal, with factors associated including intensive care admission, prolonged positive cultures and meeting research-definition CRBSI. Only 27 (9.4%) BSI episodes met the research-definition CRBSI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many central lines were removed despite infrequent formal CLABSI diagnoses. Thorough assessments for alternative sources and use of non-invasive diagnostics including repeat blood cultures prior to line removal, may allow increased appropriate retention of lines.</p>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of early line removal and successful line retention in potential central line-associated blood stream infections (CLABSIs) in haematology patients: A retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Thorburn, Sara Vogrin, Sarah Garner, Olivia Smibert, Gemma Reynolds, Jason Kwong, Jason A Trubiano, Abby P Douglas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhin.2025.04.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with haematologic malignancies are at risk of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) and their adverse outcomes. Line removal is often considered necessary for cure but creates substantial morbidity, and neutropenic patients often have alternative sources of bloodstream infection (BSI). Patients suitable for a line retention strategy remain ill-defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single centre retrospective cohort study of haematology inpatients who developed BSI with a central line in situ. Line retention was defined as line remaining in situ for ≥72 hours post BSI. The primary outcome was failure of line retention, defined as line removal >72 hours post BSI or recurrent BSI with the same organism within 3 months. Predictors of failure of line retention, early line removal (<72 hours) and IDSA central line related BSI (CRBSI) (research-definition CRBSI) were assessed using multivariable analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 288 episodes of BSI included between 1/1/2018 and 31/12/2022, 209 cases had retention of line >72 hours and 52 of these (24.9%) experienced failed line retention, with prolonged culture positivity predicting this outcome, and source of BSI other than the line associated with successful line retention on multivariate analysis. 79 (27.4%) had early line removal, with factors associated including intensive care admission, prolonged positive cultures and meeting research-definition CRBSI. Only 27 (9.4%) BSI episodes met the research-definition CRBSI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many central lines were removed despite infrequent formal CLABSI diagnoses. Thorough assessments for alternative sources and use of non-invasive diagnostics including repeat blood cultures prior to line removal, may allow increased appropriate retention of lines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2025.04.019\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2025.04.019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predictors of early line removal and successful line retention in potential central line-associated blood stream infections (CLABSIs) in haematology patients: A retrospective cohort study.
Background: Patients with haematologic malignancies are at risk of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) and their adverse outcomes. Line removal is often considered necessary for cure but creates substantial morbidity, and neutropenic patients often have alternative sources of bloodstream infection (BSI). Patients suitable for a line retention strategy remain ill-defined.
Methods: We conducted a single centre retrospective cohort study of haematology inpatients who developed BSI with a central line in situ. Line retention was defined as line remaining in situ for ≥72 hours post BSI. The primary outcome was failure of line retention, defined as line removal >72 hours post BSI or recurrent BSI with the same organism within 3 months. Predictors of failure of line retention, early line removal (<72 hours) and IDSA central line related BSI (CRBSI) (research-definition CRBSI) were assessed using multivariable analysis.
Results: Of 288 episodes of BSI included between 1/1/2018 and 31/12/2022, 209 cases had retention of line >72 hours and 52 of these (24.9%) experienced failed line retention, with prolonged culture positivity predicting this outcome, and source of BSI other than the line associated with successful line retention on multivariate analysis. 79 (27.4%) had early line removal, with factors associated including intensive care admission, prolonged positive cultures and meeting research-definition CRBSI. Only 27 (9.4%) BSI episodes met the research-definition CRBSI.
Conclusions: Many central lines were removed despite infrequent formal CLABSI diagnoses. Thorough assessments for alternative sources and use of non-invasive diagnostics including repeat blood cultures prior to line removal, may allow increased appropriate retention of lines.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience.
The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that:
provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings;
provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination;
provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises;
describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection;
throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship;
describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control;
improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change;
improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.