血液病患者潜在中心线相关血流感染(CLABSIs)的早期线切除和成功线保留的预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Samuel Thorburn, Sara Vogrin, Sarah Garner, Olivia Smibert, Gemma Reynolds, Jason Kwong, Jason A Trubiano, Abby P Douglas
{"title":"血液病患者潜在中心线相关血流感染(CLABSIs)的早期线切除和成功线保留的预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Samuel Thorburn, Sara Vogrin, Sarah Garner, Olivia Smibert, Gemma Reynolds, Jason Kwong, Jason A Trubiano, Abby P Douglas","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2025.04.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with haematologic malignancies are at risk of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) and their adverse outcomes. Line removal is often considered necessary for cure but creates substantial morbidity, and neutropenic patients often have alternative sources of bloodstream infection (BSI). Patients suitable for a line retention strategy remain ill-defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single centre retrospective cohort study of haematology inpatients who developed BSI with a central line in situ. Line retention was defined as line remaining in situ for ≥72 hours post BSI. The primary outcome was failure of line retention, defined as line removal >72 hours post BSI or recurrent BSI with the same organism within 3 months. Predictors of failure of line retention, early line removal (<72 hours) and IDSA central line related BSI (CRBSI) (research-definition CRBSI) were assessed using multivariable analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 288 episodes of BSI included between 1/1/2018 and 31/12/2022, 209 cases had retention of line >72 hours and 52 of these (24.9%) experienced failed line retention, with prolonged culture positivity predicting this outcome, and source of BSI other than the line associated with successful line retention on multivariate analysis. 79 (27.4%) had early line removal, with factors associated including intensive care admission, prolonged positive cultures and meeting research-definition CRBSI. Only 27 (9.4%) BSI episodes met the research-definition CRBSI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many central lines were removed despite infrequent formal CLABSI diagnoses. Thorough assessments for alternative sources and use of non-invasive diagnostics including repeat blood cultures prior to line removal, may allow increased appropriate retention of lines.</p>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of early line removal and successful line retention in potential central line-associated blood stream infections (CLABSIs) in haematology patients: A retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Thorburn, Sara Vogrin, Sarah Garner, Olivia Smibert, Gemma Reynolds, Jason Kwong, Jason A Trubiano, Abby P Douglas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhin.2025.04.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with haematologic malignancies are at risk of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) and their adverse outcomes. Line removal is often considered necessary for cure but creates substantial morbidity, and neutropenic patients often have alternative sources of bloodstream infection (BSI). Patients suitable for a line retention strategy remain ill-defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single centre retrospective cohort study of haematology inpatients who developed BSI with a central line in situ. Line retention was defined as line remaining in situ for ≥72 hours post BSI. The primary outcome was failure of line retention, defined as line removal >72 hours post BSI or recurrent BSI with the same organism within 3 months. Predictors of failure of line retention, early line removal (<72 hours) and IDSA central line related BSI (CRBSI) (research-definition CRBSI) were assessed using multivariable analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 288 episodes of BSI included between 1/1/2018 and 31/12/2022, 209 cases had retention of line >72 hours and 52 of these (24.9%) experienced failed line retention, with prolonged culture positivity predicting this outcome, and source of BSI other than the line associated with successful line retention on multivariate analysis. 79 (27.4%) had early line removal, with factors associated including intensive care admission, prolonged positive cultures and meeting research-definition CRBSI. Only 27 (9.4%) BSI episodes met the research-definition CRBSI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many central lines were removed despite infrequent formal CLABSI diagnoses. Thorough assessments for alternative sources and use of non-invasive diagnostics including repeat blood cultures prior to line removal, may allow increased appropriate retention of lines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2025.04.019\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2025.04.019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血液学恶性肿瘤患者有发生中央静脉相关血流感染(CLABSI)及其不良后果的风险。切除骨髓线通常被认为是治疗所必需的,但会造成严重的发病率,并且中性粒细胞减少患者通常有其他血液感染来源(BSI)。适合行留置策略的患者仍不明确。方法:我们对血液学住院患者进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究,这些患者发生了中心静脉原位BSI。系保留被定义为BSI后系在原位保留≥72小时。主要终点是线保留失败,定义为BSI后72小时内线切除或3个月内复发性BSI。结果:在2018年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间纳入的288例BSI中,209例在72小时内保留了线bbb,其中52例(24.9%)经历了失败的线保留,长时间培养阳性预测了这一结果,多变量分析显示,BSI来源与成功保留线相关。79例(27.4%)患者早期行细胞系切除,相关因素包括重症监护入院、长时间阳性培养和符合研究定义的CRBSI。只有27例(9.4%)BSI符合研究定义的CRBSI。结论:尽管很少有正式的CLABSI诊断,但许多中心静脉被切除。彻底评估替代来源和使用非侵入性诊断,包括在取线前重复血液培养,可能会增加适当的留线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors of early line removal and successful line retention in potential central line-associated blood stream infections (CLABSIs) in haematology patients: A retrospective cohort study.

Background: Patients with haematologic malignancies are at risk of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) and their adverse outcomes. Line removal is often considered necessary for cure but creates substantial morbidity, and neutropenic patients often have alternative sources of bloodstream infection (BSI). Patients suitable for a line retention strategy remain ill-defined.

Methods: We conducted a single centre retrospective cohort study of haematology inpatients who developed BSI with a central line in situ. Line retention was defined as line remaining in situ for ≥72 hours post BSI. The primary outcome was failure of line retention, defined as line removal >72 hours post BSI or recurrent BSI with the same organism within 3 months. Predictors of failure of line retention, early line removal (<72 hours) and IDSA central line related BSI (CRBSI) (research-definition CRBSI) were assessed using multivariable analysis.

Results: Of 288 episodes of BSI included between 1/1/2018 and 31/12/2022, 209 cases had retention of line >72 hours and 52 of these (24.9%) experienced failed line retention, with prolonged culture positivity predicting this outcome, and source of BSI other than the line associated with successful line retention on multivariate analysis. 79 (27.4%) had early line removal, with factors associated including intensive care admission, prolonged positive cultures and meeting research-definition CRBSI. Only 27 (9.4%) BSI episodes met the research-definition CRBSI.

Conclusions: Many central lines were removed despite infrequent formal CLABSI diagnoses. Thorough assessments for alternative sources and use of non-invasive diagnostics including repeat blood cultures prior to line removal, may allow increased appropriate retention of lines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hospital Infection
Journal of Hospital Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
271
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience. The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that: provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings; provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination; provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises; describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection; throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship; describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control; improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change; improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信