加纳妇女和保健工作者对宫颈癌筛查障碍和促进因素的看法:应用动态可持续性框架。

PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2025-04-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0003011
Adwoa Bemah Boamah Mensah, Thomas Okpoti Konney, Ernest Adankwah, John Amuasi, Madalyn Nones, Joshua Okyere, Kwame Ofori Boadu, Felicia Maame Efua Eduah, Serena Xiong, Jeong Robin Moon, Beth Virnig, Shalini Kulasingam
{"title":"加纳妇女和保健工作者对宫颈癌筛查障碍和促进因素的看法:应用动态可持续性框架。","authors":"Adwoa Bemah Boamah Mensah, Thomas Okpoti Konney, Ernest Adankwah, John Amuasi, Madalyn Nones, Joshua Okyere, Kwame Ofori Boadu, Felicia Maame Efua Eduah, Serena Xiong, Jeong Robin Moon, Beth Virnig, Shalini Kulasingam","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0003011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cervical cancer screening has reduced cervical cancer-related mortality by over 70% in countries that have achieved high coverage. However, there are significant geographic disparities in access to screening. In Ghana, although cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women, there is no national-level cervical cancer screening program, and only 2-4% of eligible Ghanaian women have ever been screened for cervical cancer. This study used an exploratory, sequential mixed-methods approach to examine barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening from women's and healthcare workers' perspectives. These were further informed by the Dynamic Sustainability Framework (DSF), in particular, two domains, namely the practice setting and ecological system. Two convenience samples of 215 women and 17 healthcare personnel were recruited for this study. All participants were from one of three selected clinics (Ejisu Government Hospital, Kumasi South Hospital, and the Suntreso Government Hospital) in the Ashanti region of Ghana. Descriptive analyses were used to group the data by practice setting. Statistical differences in means and proportions were used to evaluate women's barriers to cervical cancer screening. Quantitative findings from the women's survey informed qualitative, in-depth interviews with the healthcare workers and were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis. The median age of women and healthcare workers was 37.0 years and 38.0 years, respectively. Most women (n = 194, 90.2%) reported never having been screened. Women who had not been screened were more likely to have no college or university education. Practice setting factors included long clinic wait times and distance to the clinic. Ecological system factors identified were population characteristics such as lack of knowledge about available services, shyness when undergoing a clinician-performed pelvic exam, and requiring a spouse's permission before scheduling. These findings highlight the need for non-clinician-based, culturally sensitive cervical cancer screening options such as self-collected HPV tests to increase screening participation in Ghana.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"5 4","pages":"e0003011"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12043171/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening from women and healthcare workers in Ghana: Applying the Dynamic Sustainability Framework.\",\"authors\":\"Adwoa Bemah Boamah Mensah, Thomas Okpoti Konney, Ernest Adankwah, John Amuasi, Madalyn Nones, Joshua Okyere, Kwame Ofori Boadu, Felicia Maame Efua Eduah, Serena Xiong, Jeong Robin Moon, Beth Virnig, Shalini Kulasingam\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pgph.0003011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cervical cancer screening has reduced cervical cancer-related mortality by over 70% in countries that have achieved high coverage. However, there are significant geographic disparities in access to screening. In Ghana, although cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women, there is no national-level cervical cancer screening program, and only 2-4% of eligible Ghanaian women have ever been screened for cervical cancer. This study used an exploratory, sequential mixed-methods approach to examine barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening from women's and healthcare workers' perspectives. These were further informed by the Dynamic Sustainability Framework (DSF), in particular, two domains, namely the practice setting and ecological system. Two convenience samples of 215 women and 17 healthcare personnel were recruited for this study. All participants were from one of three selected clinics (Ejisu Government Hospital, Kumasi South Hospital, and the Suntreso Government Hospital) in the Ashanti region of Ghana. Descriptive analyses were used to group the data by practice setting. Statistical differences in means and proportions were used to evaluate women's barriers to cervical cancer screening. Quantitative findings from the women's survey informed qualitative, in-depth interviews with the healthcare workers and were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis. The median age of women and healthcare workers was 37.0 years and 38.0 years, respectively. Most women (n = 194, 90.2%) reported never having been screened. Women who had not been screened were more likely to have no college or university education. Practice setting factors included long clinic wait times and distance to the clinic. Ecological system factors identified were population characteristics such as lack of knowledge about available services, shyness when undergoing a clinician-performed pelvic exam, and requiring a spouse's permission before scheduling. These findings highlight the need for non-clinician-based, culturally sensitive cervical cancer screening options such as self-collected HPV tests to increase screening participation in Ghana.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS global public health\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"e0003011\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12043171/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS global public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在覆盖率高的国家,宫颈癌筛查使宫颈癌相关死亡率降低了70%以上。然而,在获得筛查方面存在显著的地域差异。在加纳,虽然宫颈癌是妇女中第二常见的癌症,但没有国家级的宫颈癌筛查计划,只有2% -4%的合格加纳妇女接受过宫颈癌筛查。本研究采用探索性的顺序混合方法,从妇女和保健工作者的角度检查宫颈癌筛查的障碍和促进因素。动态可持续性框架(DSF)进一步提供了这些信息,特别是两个领域,即实践环境和生态系统。本研究招募了两个方便样本,215名妇女和17名医护人员。所有参与者都来自加纳阿散蒂地区选定的三个诊所之一(埃吉苏政府医院、库马西南医院和森特雷索政府医院)。采用描述性分析,按实践设置对数据进行分组。在平均数和比例上的统计差异被用来评估妇女对宫颈癌筛查的障碍。妇女调查的定量结果为对保健工作者的定性深入访谈提供了信息,并采用归纳专题分析进行了分析。妇女和保健工作者的年龄中位数分别为37.0岁和38.0岁。大多数妇女(n = 194, 90.2%)报告从未接受过筛查。未接受筛查的女性更有可能没有接受过大学教育。实践设置因素包括门诊等待时间长和到诊所的距离。确定的生态系统因素是人口特征,如缺乏对可用服务的了解,在接受临床医生进行的盆腔检查时害羞,以及在安排前需要配偶的许可。这些发现强调需要非临床的、具有文化敏感性的宫颈癌筛查选择,例如自我收集的HPV检测,以增加加纳的筛查参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceptions of barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening from women and healthcare workers in Ghana: Applying the Dynamic Sustainability Framework.

Cervical cancer screening has reduced cervical cancer-related mortality by over 70% in countries that have achieved high coverage. However, there are significant geographic disparities in access to screening. In Ghana, although cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women, there is no national-level cervical cancer screening program, and only 2-4% of eligible Ghanaian women have ever been screened for cervical cancer. This study used an exploratory, sequential mixed-methods approach to examine barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening from women's and healthcare workers' perspectives. These were further informed by the Dynamic Sustainability Framework (DSF), in particular, two domains, namely the practice setting and ecological system. Two convenience samples of 215 women and 17 healthcare personnel were recruited for this study. All participants were from one of three selected clinics (Ejisu Government Hospital, Kumasi South Hospital, and the Suntreso Government Hospital) in the Ashanti region of Ghana. Descriptive analyses were used to group the data by practice setting. Statistical differences in means and proportions were used to evaluate women's barriers to cervical cancer screening. Quantitative findings from the women's survey informed qualitative, in-depth interviews with the healthcare workers and were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis. The median age of women and healthcare workers was 37.0 years and 38.0 years, respectively. Most women (n = 194, 90.2%) reported never having been screened. Women who had not been screened were more likely to have no college or university education. Practice setting factors included long clinic wait times and distance to the clinic. Ecological system factors identified were population characteristics such as lack of knowledge about available services, shyness when undergoing a clinician-performed pelvic exam, and requiring a spouse's permission before scheduling. These findings highlight the need for non-clinician-based, culturally sensitive cervical cancer screening options such as self-collected HPV tests to increase screening participation in Ghana.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信