用ABCD研究的见解检查青少年屏幕媒体活动的测量差异。

Yihong Zhao, Xuewei Han, Kara S Bagot, Susan F Tapert, Marc N Potenza, Martin P Paulus
{"title":"用ABCD研究的见解检查青少年屏幕媒体活动的测量差异。","authors":"Yihong Zhao, Xuewei Han, Kara S Bagot, Susan F Tapert, Marc N Potenza, Martin P Paulus","doi":"10.1038/s44184-025-00131-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Concerns about the accuracy of self-reported screen time persist due to discrepancies with objective measures. This study compared passive smartphone tracking via the \"Effortless Assessment of Risk States'' (EARS) app with self-reported screen time from 495 adolescents. Based on self-reports, 94.26% of social media use occurred on smartphones. EARS-recorded social media use was higher (1.64 ± 1.93 h) than past-year self-report (1.44 ± 1.97 h; p = 0.037) but similar to post-sensing self-report (1.63 ± 1.93 h; p = 0.835). Higher picture vocabulary scores were associated with lower odds of under-reporting social media use (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99). Both self-reported (β = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01-0.11) and EARS (β = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.03-0.12) measures correlated with externalizing symptoms. They were also correlated with social media addiction (self-reported:β = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.10-0.20; EARS:β = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01-0.11). However, past-year self-report uniquely correlated with internalizing symptoms (β = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.09) and video game addiction (β = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.10). These findings highlight the value of integrating self-report and objective measures in screen media use research.</p>","PeriodicalId":74321,"journal":{"name":"Npj mental health research","volume":"4 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064680/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining measurement discrepancies in adolescent screen media activity with insights from the ABCD study.\",\"authors\":\"Yihong Zhao, Xuewei Han, Kara S Bagot, Susan F Tapert, Marc N Potenza, Martin P Paulus\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s44184-025-00131-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Concerns about the accuracy of self-reported screen time persist due to discrepancies with objective measures. This study compared passive smartphone tracking via the \\\"Effortless Assessment of Risk States'' (EARS) app with self-reported screen time from 495 adolescents. Based on self-reports, 94.26% of social media use occurred on smartphones. EARS-recorded social media use was higher (1.64 ± 1.93 h) than past-year self-report (1.44 ± 1.97 h; p = 0.037) but similar to post-sensing self-report (1.63 ± 1.93 h; p = 0.835). Higher picture vocabulary scores were associated with lower odds of under-reporting social media use (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99). Both self-reported (β = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01-0.11) and EARS (β = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.03-0.12) measures correlated with externalizing symptoms. They were also correlated with social media addiction (self-reported:β = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.10-0.20; EARS:β = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01-0.11). However, past-year self-report uniquely correlated with internalizing symptoms (β = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.09) and video game addiction (β = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.10). These findings highlight the value of integrating self-report and objective measures in screen media use research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Npj mental health research\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064680/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Npj mental health research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-025-00131-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Npj mental health research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-025-00131-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于与客观测量的差异,对自我报告屏幕时间准确性的担忧一直存在。这项研究比较了495名青少年通过“风险状态轻松评估”(EARS)应用程序进行的被动智能手机跟踪与自我报告的屏幕时间。根据自我报告,94.26%的社交媒体使用发生在智能手机上。ear记录的社交媒体使用时间(1.64±1.93小时)高于过去一年的自我报告(1.44±1.97小时);P = 0.037),但与感知后自我报告相似(1.63±1.93 h;p = 0.835)。较高的图片词汇得分与低报社交媒体使用的几率相关(OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99)。自我报告(β = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01-0.11)和EARS (β = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.03-0.12)测量均与外化症状相关。他们还与社交媒体成瘾相关(自我报告:β = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.10-0.20;耳朵:β = 0.06, 95% ci: 0.01-0.11)。然而,过去一年的自我报告与内化症状(β = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.09)和视频游戏成瘾(β = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.10)有独特的相关性。这些发现突出了在屏幕媒体使用研究中整合自我报告和客观测量的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Examining measurement discrepancies in adolescent screen media activity with insights from the ABCD study.

Examining measurement discrepancies in adolescent screen media activity with insights from the ABCD study.

Examining measurement discrepancies in adolescent screen media activity with insights from the ABCD study.

Examining measurement discrepancies in adolescent screen media activity with insights from the ABCD study.

Concerns about the accuracy of self-reported screen time persist due to discrepancies with objective measures. This study compared passive smartphone tracking via the "Effortless Assessment of Risk States'' (EARS) app with self-reported screen time from 495 adolescents. Based on self-reports, 94.26% of social media use occurred on smartphones. EARS-recorded social media use was higher (1.64 ± 1.93 h) than past-year self-report (1.44 ± 1.97 h; p = 0.037) but similar to post-sensing self-report (1.63 ± 1.93 h; p = 0.835). Higher picture vocabulary scores were associated with lower odds of under-reporting social media use (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99). Both self-reported (β = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01-0.11) and EARS (β = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.03-0.12) measures correlated with externalizing symptoms. They were also correlated with social media addiction (self-reported:β = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.10-0.20; EARS:β = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01-0.11). However, past-year self-report uniquely correlated with internalizing symptoms (β = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.09) and video game addiction (β = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.10). These findings highlight the value of integrating self-report and objective measures in screen media use research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信