Lorraine Sazgary, Eleni Theano Samara, Anja Stüssi, Natalia Saltybaeva, Matthias Guckenberger, F Ruschitzka, Thomas Wolber, Nadine Molitor, Fu Guan, Gonca Suna, Julia Hermes-Laufer, Alexander Breitenstein, Corinna B Brunckhorst, Firat Duru, Ardan M Saguner
{"title":"临床辐射审计作为心脏电生理过程中辐射暴露优化的工具。","authors":"Lorraine Sazgary, Eleni Theano Samara, Anja Stüssi, Natalia Saltybaeva, Matthias Guckenberger, F Ruschitzka, Thomas Wolber, Nadine Molitor, Fu Guan, Gonca Suna, Julia Hermes-Laufer, Alexander Breitenstein, Corinna B Brunckhorst, Firat Duru, Ardan M Saguner","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2025.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical radiation audits are useful to reduce ionizing radiation in clinical practice. The first Swiss radiation audit in Cardiology took place at the University Heart Center Zurich in 2019.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in cardiac electrophysiology (EP) procedures to the currently available national DRLs and to examine patient radiation exposure before and after the clinical radiation audit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study including 775 patients undergoing EP procedures from 2018- 2020. Main recommendations of the clinical audit were the regular use of collimation, semitransparent filters, the reduction of cine images and frame rates. Patient radiation exposure was evaluated with cumulative doses, fluoroscopy times and dose-area product (DAP). Secondary endpoints were acute procedural success rates and 30-day complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>447 (57.5%) patients prior to, and 328 (42.3%) after the audit were included. Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed in 14.1%, PVI radiofrequency (RF) ablation in 26.8%, RF ablation of right-sided supraventricular tachycardia in 32.1%, other procedures in 27% of cases. Local DRLs for the DAP were below national DRLs (1 Gy cm<sup>2</sup> vs 150 Gy cm<sup>2</sup> for AVNRT/AVRT ablation). After the audit, there was a significant radiation reduction for right-sided supraventricular tachycardia ablation (cumulative dose: 4.8 mGy vs 2.1 mGy and fluoroscopy times: 210 seconds vs 107 seconds, p < 0.001) and PVI with RF (50.4 mGy vs 29.5 mGy, and 378 seconds vs 191 seconds, p < 0.003; respectively). No significant differences were found in acute procedural success rates or 30-day complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The clinical radiation audit was associated with a significant reduction of patient radiation exposure for right-sided supraventricular tachycardia ablation and PVI with RF.</p>","PeriodicalId":101315,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical radiation audits as a tool for the optimization of radiation exposure in cardiac electrophysiology procedures.\",\"authors\":\"Lorraine Sazgary, Eleni Theano Samara, Anja Stüssi, Natalia Saltybaeva, Matthias Guckenberger, F Ruschitzka, Thomas Wolber, Nadine Molitor, Fu Guan, Gonca Suna, Julia Hermes-Laufer, Alexander Breitenstein, Corinna B Brunckhorst, Firat Duru, Ardan M Saguner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.zemedi.2025.04.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical radiation audits are useful to reduce ionizing radiation in clinical practice. The first Swiss radiation audit in Cardiology took place at the University Heart Center Zurich in 2019.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in cardiac electrophysiology (EP) procedures to the currently available national DRLs and to examine patient radiation exposure before and after the clinical radiation audit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study including 775 patients undergoing EP procedures from 2018- 2020. Main recommendations of the clinical audit were the regular use of collimation, semitransparent filters, the reduction of cine images and frame rates. Patient radiation exposure was evaluated with cumulative doses, fluoroscopy times and dose-area product (DAP). Secondary endpoints were acute procedural success rates and 30-day complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>447 (57.5%) patients prior to, and 328 (42.3%) after the audit were included. Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed in 14.1%, PVI radiofrequency (RF) ablation in 26.8%, RF ablation of right-sided supraventricular tachycardia in 32.1%, other procedures in 27% of cases. Local DRLs for the DAP were below national DRLs (1 Gy cm<sup>2</sup> vs 150 Gy cm<sup>2</sup> for AVNRT/AVRT ablation). After the audit, there was a significant radiation reduction for right-sided supraventricular tachycardia ablation (cumulative dose: 4.8 mGy vs 2.1 mGy and fluoroscopy times: 210 seconds vs 107 seconds, p < 0.001) and PVI with RF (50.4 mGy vs 29.5 mGy, and 378 seconds vs 191 seconds, p < 0.003; respectively). No significant differences were found in acute procedural success rates or 30-day complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The clinical radiation audit was associated with a significant reduction of patient radiation exposure for right-sided supraventricular tachycardia ablation and PVI with RF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2025.04.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2025.04.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:临床放射审计在临床实践中有助于减少电离辐射。第一次瑞士心脏病学辐射审计于2019年在苏黎世大学心脏中心进行。目的:比较心脏电生理检查(EP)的地方诊断参考水平(drl)与目前可用的国家诊断参考水平(drl),并检查患者在临床放射审计前后的辐射暴露情况。方法:回顾性研究包括775例2018- 2020年接受EP手术的患者。临床审计的主要建议是定期使用准直,半透明滤光片,降低电影图像和帧率。用累积剂量、透视次数和剂量面积积(DAP)评估患者的辐射暴露。次要终点是急性手术成功率和30天并发症。结果:审计前纳入447例(57.5%),审计后纳入328例(42.3%)。冷冻球囊肺静脉隔离术(PVI)占14.1%,射频消融术(RF)占26.8%,射频消融术治疗右侧室上性心动过速占32.1%,其他手术占27%。DAP的局部DRLs低于国家DRLs (1 Gy cm2 vs 150 Gy cm2的AVNRT/AVRT消融)。审计后,右侧室上心动过速消融(累积剂量:4.8 mGy vs 2.1 mGy,透视次数:210秒vs 107秒,p < 0.001)和PVI合并RF (50.4 mGy vs 29.5 mGy, 378秒vs 191秒,p < 0.003;分别)。急性手术成功率和30天并发症无显著差异。结论:临床放射审计与右侧室上性心动过速消融和PVI伴射频的患者放射暴露显著减少相关。
Clinical radiation audits as a tool for the optimization of radiation exposure in cardiac electrophysiology procedures.
Background: Clinical radiation audits are useful to reduce ionizing radiation in clinical practice. The first Swiss radiation audit in Cardiology took place at the University Heart Center Zurich in 2019.
Objectives: To compare local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in cardiac electrophysiology (EP) procedures to the currently available national DRLs and to examine patient radiation exposure before and after the clinical radiation audit.
Methods: Retrospective study including 775 patients undergoing EP procedures from 2018- 2020. Main recommendations of the clinical audit were the regular use of collimation, semitransparent filters, the reduction of cine images and frame rates. Patient radiation exposure was evaluated with cumulative doses, fluoroscopy times and dose-area product (DAP). Secondary endpoints were acute procedural success rates and 30-day complications.
Results: 447 (57.5%) patients prior to, and 328 (42.3%) after the audit were included. Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed in 14.1%, PVI radiofrequency (RF) ablation in 26.8%, RF ablation of right-sided supraventricular tachycardia in 32.1%, other procedures in 27% of cases. Local DRLs for the DAP were below national DRLs (1 Gy cm2 vs 150 Gy cm2 for AVNRT/AVRT ablation). After the audit, there was a significant radiation reduction for right-sided supraventricular tachycardia ablation (cumulative dose: 4.8 mGy vs 2.1 mGy and fluoroscopy times: 210 seconds vs 107 seconds, p < 0.001) and PVI with RF (50.4 mGy vs 29.5 mGy, and 378 seconds vs 191 seconds, p < 0.003; respectively). No significant differences were found in acute procedural success rates or 30-day complications.
Conclusions: The clinical radiation audit was associated with a significant reduction of patient radiation exposure for right-sided supraventricular tachycardia ablation and PVI with RF.