开发一种评估绝经期泌尿生殖系统综合征妇女阴道健康的新工具的可行性VAN研究。

Q3 Medicine
Paula Briggs, Christopher Evans, Steven Lane, Lora Kiosseva, Jo Drury, Tim Hillard, Nick Panay, Dharani K Hapangama
{"title":"开发一种评估绝经期泌尿生殖系统综合征妇女阴道健康的新工具的可行性VAN研究。","authors":"Paula Briggs, Christopher Evans, Steven Lane, Lora Kiosseva, Jo Drury, Tim Hillard, Nick Panay, Dharani K Hapangama","doi":"10.1177/20533691251332321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesGenitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a common condition, yet there is no accessible, objective clinical method with which to make a diagnosis of vaginal changes associated with GSM. We undertook a feasibility study to assess suitability of different objective diagnostic methods and obtained quantitative scores using a new GSM Assessment Tool (NGAT) and vaginal maturation vlue (VMV). These scores were correlated with patient reported symptoms obtained via a questionnaire.Study DesignVAginal Health - What's Normal (VAN) Study is a prospective, observational, feasibility study, evaluating NGAT and VMV. Sixty women (12 healthy controls and 48 symptomatic) were recruited and had a baseline assessment. The symptomatic women were offered treatment and had a second assessment 16 weeks later.ResultsCompared with control group, symptomatic women had higher NGAT and VMV scores at baseline. After treatment, in symptomatic women, symptoms improved and NGAT scores reduced, while the median value for VMV was unexpectedly reduced.ConclusionsThis data suggests that clinical assessment and accurate recording of GSM can be supported by an objective scoring system, particularly in primary care and warrants adequately powered future studies to assess the utility of these methods in clinical and research setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":52104,"journal":{"name":"Post reproductive health","volume":" ","pages":"20533691251332321"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of developing a new tool for assessing vaginal health in women with Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause; The VAN study.\",\"authors\":\"Paula Briggs, Christopher Evans, Steven Lane, Lora Kiosseva, Jo Drury, Tim Hillard, Nick Panay, Dharani K Hapangama\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20533691251332321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectivesGenitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a common condition, yet there is no accessible, objective clinical method with which to make a diagnosis of vaginal changes associated with GSM. We undertook a feasibility study to assess suitability of different objective diagnostic methods and obtained quantitative scores using a new GSM Assessment Tool (NGAT) and vaginal maturation vlue (VMV). These scores were correlated with patient reported symptoms obtained via a questionnaire.Study DesignVAginal Health - What's Normal (VAN) Study is a prospective, observational, feasibility study, evaluating NGAT and VMV. Sixty women (12 healthy controls and 48 symptomatic) were recruited and had a baseline assessment. The symptomatic women were offered treatment and had a second assessment 16 weeks later.ResultsCompared with control group, symptomatic women had higher NGAT and VMV scores at baseline. After treatment, in symptomatic women, symptoms improved and NGAT scores reduced, while the median value for VMV was unexpectedly reduced.ConclusionsThis data suggests that clinical assessment and accurate recording of GSM can be supported by an objective scoring system, particularly in primary care and warrants adequately powered future studies to assess the utility of these methods in clinical and research setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Post reproductive health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"20533691251332321\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Post reproductive health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20533691251332321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Post reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20533691251332321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的绝经期泌尿生殖系统综合征(GSM)是一种常见的疾病,但目前还没有一种可获得的、客观的临床方法来诊断与GSM相关的阴道改变。我们进行了可行性研究,以评估不同客观诊断方法的适用性,并使用新的GSM评估工具(NGAT)和阴道成熟值(VMV)获得定量评分。这些分数与通过问卷调查获得的患者报告的症状相关。阴道健康-正常情况(VAN)研究是一项前瞻性、观察性、可行性研究,旨在评估NGAT和VMV。招募了60名妇女(12名健康对照和48名有症状的妇女)并进行了基线评估。有症状的妇女接受治疗,并在16周后进行第二次评估。结果与对照组相比,有症状的妇女在基线时的NGAT和VMV评分较高。治疗后,有症状的女性症状改善,NGAT评分降低,而VMV的中位数出乎意料地降低。结论:该数据表明,客观评分系统可以支持临床评估和准确记录GSM,特别是在初级保健中,并保证充分支持未来的研究,以评估这些方法在临床和研究环境中的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of developing a new tool for assessing vaginal health in women with Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause; The VAN study.

ObjectivesGenitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a common condition, yet there is no accessible, objective clinical method with which to make a diagnosis of vaginal changes associated with GSM. We undertook a feasibility study to assess suitability of different objective diagnostic methods and obtained quantitative scores using a new GSM Assessment Tool (NGAT) and vaginal maturation vlue (VMV). These scores were correlated with patient reported symptoms obtained via a questionnaire.Study DesignVAginal Health - What's Normal (VAN) Study is a prospective, observational, feasibility study, evaluating NGAT and VMV. Sixty women (12 healthy controls and 48 symptomatic) were recruited and had a baseline assessment. The symptomatic women were offered treatment and had a second assessment 16 weeks later.ResultsCompared with control group, symptomatic women had higher NGAT and VMV scores at baseline. After treatment, in symptomatic women, symptoms improved and NGAT scores reduced, while the median value for VMV was unexpectedly reduced.ConclusionsThis data suggests that clinical assessment and accurate recording of GSM can be supported by an objective scoring system, particularly in primary care and warrants adequately powered future studies to assess the utility of these methods in clinical and research setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Post reproductive health
Post reproductive health Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Post Reproductive Health (formerly Menopause International) is a MEDLINE indexed, peer reviewed source of news, research and opinion. Aimed at all those involved in the field of post reproductive health study and treatment, it is a vital resource for all practitioners and researchers. As the official journal of the British Menopause Society (BMS), Post Reproductive Health has a broad scope, tackling all the issues in this field, including the current controversies surrounding postmenopausal health and an ageing and expanding female population. Initially this journal will concentrate on the key areas of menopause, sexual health, urogynaecology, metabolic bone disease, cancer diagnosis and treatment, recovering from cancer, cardiovascular disease, cognition, prescribing, use of new hormone therapies, psychology, the science of ageing, sociology, economics, and quality of life. However as a progressive and innovative journal the Editors are always willing to consider other areas relevant to this rapidly expanding area of healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信