肠减压引流预防内镜下粘膜下剥离电凝综合征的前瞻性研究

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Gastroenterology Report Pub Date : 2025-04-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/gastro/goaf020
Yunpeng Dong, Jiao Liu, Wen Jia, Meng Zhang, Xuezhu Wang, Meiling Lin, Zhuo Yang
{"title":"肠减压引流预防内镜下粘膜下剥离电凝综合征的前瞻性研究","authors":"Yunpeng Dong, Jiao Liu, Wen Jia, Meng Zhang, Xuezhu Wang, Meiling Lin, Zhuo Yang","doi":"10.1093/gastro/goaf020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>This study explored the efficacy of a prophylactic intestinal decompression tube in reducing the incidence of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome (PECS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 157 eligible patients with colorectal mucosal lesions scheduled for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) were prospectively recruited; after drop out 11 patients, 146 patients were randomly assigned to an experimental group (group 1, <i>n </i>=<i> </i>73) or control group (group 2, <i>n </i>=<i> </i>73). Patients in the experimental group underwent placement of an intestinal decompression drainage tube after ESD, while the control group received no additional treatment after ESD. The primary outcome was the incidence of PECS. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of postoperative complications, time to removal of the intestinal decompression tube, the degree of abdominal pain as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS), and the participants' self-rated comfort level with the intestinal decompression tube.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 146 patients (<i>n </i>=<i> </i>73 per group) were finally analyzed between July 2022 and February 2023. All tumors were successfully resected en bloc. A significant difference in the incidence of PECS was found between group 1 and group 2 (5.5% vs 16.4%; <i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.034). Precisely, 61.6% of patients felt painless for intestinal decompression tube, and no severe or unbearable pain was reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The placement of intestinal decompression drainage tube could reduce the incidence of PECS after colorectal ESD, which might play a preventive role in the occurrence of PECS.</p>","PeriodicalId":54275,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Report","volume":"13 ","pages":"goaf020"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12000527/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intestinal decompression and drainage in preventing post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome in colorectal ESD: a prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Yunpeng Dong, Jiao Liu, Wen Jia, Meng Zhang, Xuezhu Wang, Meiling Lin, Zhuo Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gastro/goaf020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>This study explored the efficacy of a prophylactic intestinal decompression tube in reducing the incidence of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome (PECS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 157 eligible patients with colorectal mucosal lesions scheduled for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) were prospectively recruited; after drop out 11 patients, 146 patients were randomly assigned to an experimental group (group 1, <i>n </i>=<i> </i>73) or control group (group 2, <i>n </i>=<i> </i>73). Patients in the experimental group underwent placement of an intestinal decompression drainage tube after ESD, while the control group received no additional treatment after ESD. The primary outcome was the incidence of PECS. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of postoperative complications, time to removal of the intestinal decompression tube, the degree of abdominal pain as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS), and the participants' self-rated comfort level with the intestinal decompression tube.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 146 patients (<i>n </i>=<i> </i>73 per group) were finally analyzed between July 2022 and February 2023. All tumors were successfully resected en bloc. A significant difference in the incidence of PECS was found between group 1 and group 2 (5.5% vs 16.4%; <i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.034). Precisely, 61.6% of patients felt painless for intestinal decompression tube, and no severe or unbearable pain was reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The placement of intestinal decompression drainage tube could reduce the incidence of PECS after colorectal ESD, which might play a preventive role in the occurrence of PECS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastroenterology Report\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"goaf020\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12000527/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastroenterology Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goaf020\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Report","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goaf020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:本研究探讨预防性肠减压管对降低内镜后粘膜下夹层电凝综合征(PECS)发生率的作用。方法:前瞻性招募157例符合条件的结肠黏膜病变患者行内镜下粘膜剥离术(ESD);剔除11例患者后,将146例患者随机分为实验组(第1组,n = 73)和对照组(第2组,n = 73)。实验组患者在ESD后放置肠减压引流管,对照组患者在ESD后不进行其他治疗。主要观察指标为PECS的发生率。次要结果包括术后并发症的发生率、拔出肠减压管的时间、用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量的腹痛程度以及参与者对肠减压管的自评舒适度。结果:在2022年7月至2023年2月期间,共分析了146例患者(每组73例)。所有肿瘤均成功切除。1组和2组PECS的发生率有显著差异(5.5% vs 16.4%;p = 0.034)。确切地说,61.6%的患者在肠减压管中无痛,无严重或难以忍受的疼痛。结论:结肠ESD术后放置肠减压引流管可降低PECS的发生率,可能对PECS的发生起到预防作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Intestinal decompression and drainage in preventing post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome in colorectal ESD: a prospective study.

Intestinal decompression and drainage in preventing post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome in colorectal ESD: a prospective study.

Intestinal decompression and drainage in preventing post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome in colorectal ESD: a prospective study.

Intestinal decompression and drainage in preventing post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome in colorectal ESD: a prospective study.

Background and aims: This study explored the efficacy of a prophylactic intestinal decompression tube in reducing the incidence of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome (PECS).

Methods: A total of 157 eligible patients with colorectal mucosal lesions scheduled for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) were prospectively recruited; after drop out 11 patients, 146 patients were randomly assigned to an experimental group (group 1, n =73) or control group (group 2, n =73). Patients in the experimental group underwent placement of an intestinal decompression drainage tube after ESD, while the control group received no additional treatment after ESD. The primary outcome was the incidence of PECS. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of postoperative complications, time to removal of the intestinal decompression tube, the degree of abdominal pain as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS), and the participants' self-rated comfort level with the intestinal decompression tube.

Results: A total of 146 patients (n =73 per group) were finally analyzed between July 2022 and February 2023. All tumors were successfully resected en bloc. A significant difference in the incidence of PECS was found between group 1 and group 2 (5.5% vs 16.4%; P =0.034). Precisely, 61.6% of patients felt painless for intestinal decompression tube, and no severe or unbearable pain was reported.

Conclusions: The placement of intestinal decompression drainage tube could reduce the incidence of PECS after colorectal ESD, which might play a preventive role in the occurrence of PECS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastroenterology Report
Gastroenterology Report Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
63
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology Report is an international fully open access (OA) online only journal, covering all areas related to gastrointestinal sciences, including studies of the alimentary tract, liver, biliary, pancreas, enteral nutrition and related fields. The journal aims to publish high quality research articles on both basic and clinical gastroenterology, authoritative reviews that bring together new advances in the field, as well as commentaries and highlight pieces that provide expert analysis of topical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信