{"title":"肠减压引流预防内镜下粘膜下剥离电凝综合征的前瞻性研究","authors":"Yunpeng Dong, Jiao Liu, Wen Jia, Meng Zhang, Xuezhu Wang, Meiling Lin, Zhuo Yang","doi":"10.1093/gastro/goaf020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>This study explored the efficacy of a prophylactic intestinal decompression tube in reducing the incidence of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome (PECS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 157 eligible patients with colorectal mucosal lesions scheduled for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) were prospectively recruited; after drop out 11 patients, 146 patients were randomly assigned to an experimental group (group 1, <i>n </i>=<i> </i>73) or control group (group 2, <i>n </i>=<i> </i>73). Patients in the experimental group underwent placement of an intestinal decompression drainage tube after ESD, while the control group received no additional treatment after ESD. The primary outcome was the incidence of PECS. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of postoperative complications, time to removal of the intestinal decompression tube, the degree of abdominal pain as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS), and the participants' self-rated comfort level with the intestinal decompression tube.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 146 patients (<i>n </i>=<i> </i>73 per group) were finally analyzed between July 2022 and February 2023. All tumors were successfully resected en bloc. A significant difference in the incidence of PECS was found between group 1 and group 2 (5.5% vs 16.4%; <i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.034). Precisely, 61.6% of patients felt painless for intestinal decompression tube, and no severe or unbearable pain was reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The placement of intestinal decompression drainage tube could reduce the incidence of PECS after colorectal ESD, which might play a preventive role in the occurrence of PECS.</p>","PeriodicalId":54275,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Report","volume":"13 ","pages":"goaf020"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12000527/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intestinal decompression and drainage in preventing post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome in colorectal ESD: a prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Yunpeng Dong, Jiao Liu, Wen Jia, Meng Zhang, Xuezhu Wang, Meiling Lin, Zhuo Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gastro/goaf020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>This study explored the efficacy of a prophylactic intestinal decompression tube in reducing the incidence of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome (PECS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 157 eligible patients with colorectal mucosal lesions scheduled for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) were prospectively recruited; after drop out 11 patients, 146 patients were randomly assigned to an experimental group (group 1, <i>n </i>=<i> </i>73) or control group (group 2, <i>n </i>=<i> </i>73). Patients in the experimental group underwent placement of an intestinal decompression drainage tube after ESD, while the control group received no additional treatment after ESD. The primary outcome was the incidence of PECS. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of postoperative complications, time to removal of the intestinal decompression tube, the degree of abdominal pain as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS), and the participants' self-rated comfort level with the intestinal decompression tube.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 146 patients (<i>n </i>=<i> </i>73 per group) were finally analyzed between July 2022 and February 2023. All tumors were successfully resected en bloc. A significant difference in the incidence of PECS was found between group 1 and group 2 (5.5% vs 16.4%; <i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.034). Precisely, 61.6% of patients felt painless for intestinal decompression tube, and no severe or unbearable pain was reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The placement of intestinal decompression drainage tube could reduce the incidence of PECS after colorectal ESD, which might play a preventive role in the occurrence of PECS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastroenterology Report\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"goaf020\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12000527/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastroenterology Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goaf020\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Report","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goaf020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与目的:本研究探讨预防性肠减压管对降低内镜后粘膜下夹层电凝综合征(PECS)发生率的作用。方法:前瞻性招募157例符合条件的结肠黏膜病变患者行内镜下粘膜剥离术(ESD);剔除11例患者后,将146例患者随机分为实验组(第1组,n = 73)和对照组(第2组,n = 73)。实验组患者在ESD后放置肠减压引流管,对照组患者在ESD后不进行其他治疗。主要观察指标为PECS的发生率。次要结果包括术后并发症的发生率、拔出肠减压管的时间、用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量的腹痛程度以及参与者对肠减压管的自评舒适度。结果:在2022年7月至2023年2月期间,共分析了146例患者(每组73例)。所有肿瘤均成功切除。1组和2组PECS的发生率有显著差异(5.5% vs 16.4%;p = 0.034)。确切地说,61.6%的患者在肠减压管中无痛,无严重或难以忍受的疼痛。结论:结肠ESD术后放置肠减压引流管可降低PECS的发生率,可能对PECS的发生起到预防作用。
Intestinal decompression and drainage in preventing post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome in colorectal ESD: a prospective study.
Background and aims: This study explored the efficacy of a prophylactic intestinal decompression tube in reducing the incidence of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome (PECS).
Methods: A total of 157 eligible patients with colorectal mucosal lesions scheduled for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) were prospectively recruited; after drop out 11 patients, 146 patients were randomly assigned to an experimental group (group 1, n =73) or control group (group 2, n =73). Patients in the experimental group underwent placement of an intestinal decompression drainage tube after ESD, while the control group received no additional treatment after ESD. The primary outcome was the incidence of PECS. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of postoperative complications, time to removal of the intestinal decompression tube, the degree of abdominal pain as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS), and the participants' self-rated comfort level with the intestinal decompression tube.
Results: A total of 146 patients (n =73 per group) were finally analyzed between July 2022 and February 2023. All tumors were successfully resected en bloc. A significant difference in the incidence of PECS was found between group 1 and group 2 (5.5% vs 16.4%; P =0.034). Precisely, 61.6% of patients felt painless for intestinal decompression tube, and no severe or unbearable pain was reported.
Conclusions: The placement of intestinal decompression drainage tube could reduce the incidence of PECS after colorectal ESD, which might play a preventive role in the occurrence of PECS.
期刊介绍:
Gastroenterology Report is an international fully open access (OA) online only journal, covering all areas related to gastrointestinal sciences, including studies of the alimentary tract, liver, biliary, pancreas, enteral nutrition and related fields. The journal aims to publish high quality research articles on both basic and clinical gastroenterology, authoritative reviews that bring together new advances in the field, as well as commentaries and highlight pieces that provide expert analysis of topical issues.