抗抑郁药试验持续时间与实际使用持续时间:一项系统分析。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
William Ward, Alyson Haslam, Vinay Prasad
{"title":"抗抑郁药试验持续时间与实际使用持续时间:一项系统分析。","authors":"William Ward, Alyson Haslam, Vinay Prasad","doi":"10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.04.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antidepressant use is rising globally, with increasing duration of real-world prescribing. While the FDA considers 6-8 week trials adequate for regulatory approval, guidelines recommend prolonged treatment, raising questions about evidence supporting long-term prescribing practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive review analyzed 52 placebo-controlled randomized trials (n = 10,116) of the 10 most commonly prescribed antidepressants, sampled at 5-year intervals (1978-2023). We compared trial durations with real-world usage patterns from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and assessed methodological characteristics including standardized scales, withdrawal monitoring, and taper protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median duration of antidepressant use in the United States was approximately 5 years, while the median trial duration was 8 weeks (IQR: 6-12 weeks). Among trials, 88.5% (n = 46) lasted ≤12 weeks, 11.5% (n = 6) randomized participants beyond 12 weeks, and none exceeded 52 weeks. Few trials monitored withdrawal symptoms (3.8%), included taper protocols (18.9%), or reported post-treatment outcomes (1.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A substantial discordance exists between the typical 8-week duration of clinical trials and the median 5-year real-world use of antidepressants. This gap, compounded by inadequate monitoring for withdrawal effects and post-treatment outcomes, raises important questions about the evidence supporting current long-term prescribing practices. Publicly funded trials of longer duration that include monitoring for withdrawal and relapse are necessary to determine optimal antidepressant therapy duration.</p>","PeriodicalId":50807,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antidepressant Trial Duration Versus Duration of Real-World Use: A Systematic Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"William Ward, Alyson Haslam, Vinay Prasad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.04.037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antidepressant use is rising globally, with increasing duration of real-world prescribing. While the FDA considers 6-8 week trials adequate for regulatory approval, guidelines recommend prolonged treatment, raising questions about evidence supporting long-term prescribing practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive review analyzed 52 placebo-controlled randomized trials (n = 10,116) of the 10 most commonly prescribed antidepressants, sampled at 5-year intervals (1978-2023). We compared trial durations with real-world usage patterns from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and assessed methodological characteristics including standardized scales, withdrawal monitoring, and taper protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median duration of antidepressant use in the United States was approximately 5 years, while the median trial duration was 8 weeks (IQR: 6-12 weeks). Among trials, 88.5% (n = 46) lasted ≤12 weeks, 11.5% (n = 6) randomized participants beyond 12 weeks, and none exceeded 52 weeks. Few trials monitored withdrawal symptoms (3.8%), included taper protocols (18.9%), or reported post-treatment outcomes (1.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A substantial discordance exists between the typical 8-week duration of clinical trials and the median 5-year real-world use of antidepressants. This gap, compounded by inadequate monitoring for withdrawal effects and post-treatment outcomes, raises important questions about the evidence supporting current long-term prescribing practices. Publicly funded trials of longer duration that include monitoring for withdrawal and relapse are necessary to determine optimal antidepressant therapy duration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.04.037\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.04.037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:抗抑郁药的使用在全球范围内呈上升趋势,实际处方的持续时间也在增加。虽然FDA认为6-8周的试验足以获得监管部门的批准,但指南建议延长治疗时间,这引发了对支持长期处方实践的证据的质疑。方法:本描述性综述分析了52项安慰剂对照随机试验(n=10,116),涉及10种最常用的抗抑郁药,每5年采样一次(1978-2023)。我们将试验持续时间与来自国家健康和营养检查调查的真实使用模式进行了比较,并评估了方法学特征,包括标准化量表、戒断监测和逐渐减少方案。结果:在美国,抗抑郁药使用的中位持续时间约为5年,而中位试验持续时间为8周(IQR: 6-12周)。在试验中,88.5% (n=46)持续≤12周,11.5% (n=6)随机受试者超过12周,没有受试者超过52周。很少有试验监测戒断症状(3.8%),包括减药方案(18.9%)或报告治疗后结果(1.9%)。结论:典型的8周临床试验持续时间与抗抑郁药实际使用的中位数5年之间存在实质性的不一致。这一差距,再加上对戒断效应和治疗后结果的监测不足,对支持当前长期处方做法的证据提出了重要问题。为了确定最佳的抗抑郁治疗持续时间,有必要进行包括监测停药和复发在内的更长时间的公共资助试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antidepressant Trial Duration Versus Duration of Real-World Use: A Systematic Analysis.

Background: Antidepressant use is rising globally, with increasing duration of real-world prescribing. While the FDA considers 6-8 week trials adequate for regulatory approval, guidelines recommend prolonged treatment, raising questions about evidence supporting long-term prescribing practices.

Methods: This descriptive review analyzed 52 placebo-controlled randomized trials (n = 10,116) of the 10 most commonly prescribed antidepressants, sampled at 5-year intervals (1978-2023). We compared trial durations with real-world usage patterns from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and assessed methodological characteristics including standardized scales, withdrawal monitoring, and taper protocols.

Results: The median duration of antidepressant use in the United States was approximately 5 years, while the median trial duration was 8 weeks (IQR: 6-12 weeks). Among trials, 88.5% (n = 46) lasted ≤12 weeks, 11.5% (n = 6) randomized participants beyond 12 weeks, and none exceeded 52 weeks. Few trials monitored withdrawal symptoms (3.8%), included taper protocols (18.9%), or reported post-treatment outcomes (1.9%).

Conclusions: A substantial discordance exists between the typical 8-week duration of clinical trials and the median 5-year real-world use of antidepressants. This gap, compounded by inadequate monitoring for withdrawal effects and post-treatment outcomes, raises important questions about the evidence supporting current long-term prescribing practices. Publicly funded trials of longer duration that include monitoring for withdrawal and relapse are necessary to determine optimal antidepressant therapy duration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Medicine
American Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
449
审稿时长
9 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Medicine - "The Green Journal" - publishes original clinical research of interest to physicians in internal medicine, both in academia and community-based practice. AJM is the official journal of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, a prestigious group comprising internal medicine department chairs at more than 125 medical schools across the U.S. Each issue carries useful reviews as well as seminal articles of immediate interest to the practicing physician, including peer-reviewed, original scientific studies that have direct clinical significance and position papers on health care issues, medical education, and public policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信