头孢呋辛致过敏反应的嗜碱性细胞活化试验和淋巴细胞转化试验。

IF 3.3 Q2 ALLERGY
Frontiers in allergy Pub Date : 2025-03-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/falgy.2025.1532775
Andreas Glässner, Diana Dubrall, Gerda Wurpts, Philipp Deck, Günther Weindl, Caspar A Heubach, Amir S Yazdi, Bernhardt Sachs
{"title":"头孢呋辛致过敏反应的嗜碱性细胞活化试验和淋巴细胞转化试验。","authors":"Andreas Glässner, Diana Dubrall, Gerda Wurpts, Philipp Deck, Günther Weindl, Caspar A Heubach, Amir S Yazdi, Bernhardt Sachs","doi":"10.3389/falgy.2025.1532775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cefuroxime allergy may present as a delayed-type reaction or as an immunoglobulin (Ig)E-mediated immediate-type anaphylactic reaction. The basophil activation test (BAT) is a diagnostic tool for cefuroxime-induced immediate-type reactions, whereas the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) is typically applied in delayed-type drug allergy. This study aimed to compare the results of the BAT and LTT in 15 patients with cefuroxime-induced anaphylactic reactions considered as confirmed. The pharmacoepidemiological part aimed to analyze spontaneous reports of cefuroxime-associated anaphylactic reactions in the European adverse drug reaction database (EudraVigilance).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In EudraVigilance, 668 reports of cefuroxime-associated anaphylactic reactions for the European Economic Area (EEA) between 2010 and 2023 were analyzed, with 182 (27.2%) of these reports originating from Germany. The BAT and the LTT were performed according to standard protocols. Except for one patient, all BAT were performed prior to the skin tests, whereas all LTT were performed thereafter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Almost all reports were classified as serious (EEA, 99.3%; Germany, 98.9%). In 60.8% (EEA) and 66.9% (Germany) of reports with respective information, the reaction occurred after intravenous administration. BAT was performed in 12 of 15 patients (3/12 positive; sensitivity 25%), while LTT was performed in all 15 patients (7/15 positive; sensitivity 46.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis highlights the importance of cefuroxime-associated anaphylactic reactions, as almost all of the spontaneous reports were classified as serious. Neither a negative BAT nor LTT can rule out a sensitization in cefuroxime-induced anaphylactic reactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":73062,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in allergy","volume":"6 ","pages":"1532775"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11983509/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Basophil activation test and lymphocyte transformation test in cefuroxime-induced anaphylactic reactions.\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Glässner, Diana Dubrall, Gerda Wurpts, Philipp Deck, Günther Weindl, Caspar A Heubach, Amir S Yazdi, Bernhardt Sachs\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/falgy.2025.1532775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cefuroxime allergy may present as a delayed-type reaction or as an immunoglobulin (Ig)E-mediated immediate-type anaphylactic reaction. The basophil activation test (BAT) is a diagnostic tool for cefuroxime-induced immediate-type reactions, whereas the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) is typically applied in delayed-type drug allergy. This study aimed to compare the results of the BAT and LTT in 15 patients with cefuroxime-induced anaphylactic reactions considered as confirmed. The pharmacoepidemiological part aimed to analyze spontaneous reports of cefuroxime-associated anaphylactic reactions in the European adverse drug reaction database (EudraVigilance).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In EudraVigilance, 668 reports of cefuroxime-associated anaphylactic reactions for the European Economic Area (EEA) between 2010 and 2023 were analyzed, with 182 (27.2%) of these reports originating from Germany. The BAT and the LTT were performed according to standard protocols. Except for one patient, all BAT were performed prior to the skin tests, whereas all LTT were performed thereafter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Almost all reports were classified as serious (EEA, 99.3%; Germany, 98.9%). In 60.8% (EEA) and 66.9% (Germany) of reports with respective information, the reaction occurred after intravenous administration. BAT was performed in 12 of 15 patients (3/12 positive; sensitivity 25%), while LTT was performed in all 15 patients (7/15 positive; sensitivity 46.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis highlights the importance of cefuroxime-associated anaphylactic reactions, as almost all of the spontaneous reports were classified as serious. Neither a negative BAT nor LTT can rule out a sensitization in cefuroxime-induced anaphylactic reactions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in allergy\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"1532775\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11983509/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2025.1532775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2025.1532775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

头孢呋辛过敏可表现为延迟型反应或免疫球蛋白(Ig) e介导的立即型过敏反应。嗜碱性粒细胞激活试验(BAT)是头孢呋辛引起的立即型反应的诊断工具,而淋巴细胞转化试验(LTT)通常用于延迟型药物过敏。本研究旨在比较15例经确认的头孢呋辛致过敏反应患者的BAT和LTT结果。药物流行病学部分旨在分析欧洲药物不良反应数据库(EudraVigilance)中头孢呋辛相关过敏反应的自发报告。方法:对2010 - 2023年欧洲经济区(EEA)报告的668例头孢呋辛相关过敏反应进行分析,其中182例(27.2%)来自德国。BAT和LTT按标准方案进行。除1例患者外,所有BAT均在皮肤试验前进行,而所有LTT均在皮肤试验后进行。结果:几乎所有报告均为严重(EEA, 99.3%;德国,98.9%)。有相关资料的报告中,60.8%(欧洲经济区)和66.9%(德国)的反应发生在静脉给药后。15例患者中12例行BAT(3/12阳性;敏感性25%),而所有15例患者均进行了LTT治疗(7/15阳性;灵敏度46.7%)。结论:我们的分析强调了头孢呋辛相关过敏反应的重要性,因为几乎所有的自发报告都被归类为严重。BAT阴性和LTT阴性都不能排除头孢呋辛引起的过敏反应致敏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Basophil activation test and lymphocyte transformation test in cefuroxime-induced anaphylactic reactions.

Introduction: Cefuroxime allergy may present as a delayed-type reaction or as an immunoglobulin (Ig)E-mediated immediate-type anaphylactic reaction. The basophil activation test (BAT) is a diagnostic tool for cefuroxime-induced immediate-type reactions, whereas the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) is typically applied in delayed-type drug allergy. This study aimed to compare the results of the BAT and LTT in 15 patients with cefuroxime-induced anaphylactic reactions considered as confirmed. The pharmacoepidemiological part aimed to analyze spontaneous reports of cefuroxime-associated anaphylactic reactions in the European adverse drug reaction database (EudraVigilance).

Methods: In EudraVigilance, 668 reports of cefuroxime-associated anaphylactic reactions for the European Economic Area (EEA) between 2010 and 2023 were analyzed, with 182 (27.2%) of these reports originating from Germany. The BAT and the LTT were performed according to standard protocols. Except for one patient, all BAT were performed prior to the skin tests, whereas all LTT were performed thereafter.

Results: Almost all reports were classified as serious (EEA, 99.3%; Germany, 98.9%). In 60.8% (EEA) and 66.9% (Germany) of reports with respective information, the reaction occurred after intravenous administration. BAT was performed in 12 of 15 patients (3/12 positive; sensitivity 25%), while LTT was performed in all 15 patients (7/15 positive; sensitivity 46.7%).

Conclusions: Our analysis highlights the importance of cefuroxime-associated anaphylactic reactions, as almost all of the spontaneous reports were classified as serious. Neither a negative BAT nor LTT can rule out a sensitization in cefuroxime-induced anaphylactic reactions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信