[与公共援助受助人饮食质量有关的因素]。

Shingo Hayashi
{"title":"[与公共援助受助人饮食质量有关的因素]。","authors":"Shingo Hayashi","doi":"10.11236/jph.24-143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives This study aimed to identify factors associated with diet quality among public assistance recipients. Specifically, the study examined the impact of basic attributes and social isolation (emotional support, instrumental support, face-to-face contact, and non-face-to-face contact) on diet quality.Methods The participants of this survey were 1,878 public assistance recipients within the jurisdiction of the Public Health and Welfare Center, Izumi Ward, Sendai City, Miyagi Prefecture, as of October 1, 2023. As an indicator of diet quality, the \"Diet Quality Score for Japanese (DQSJ)\" was used, calculated using a 12-item simplified questionnaire. Data on DQSJ scores and social support were collected from the participants, whereas basic attributes, including sex, age, household size, household type, and employment status, were obtained from the public assistance system. Participants were classified into low- and high-DQSJ groups based on the median DQSJ score, and a descriptive analysis was conducted to assess its association with basic attributes and social support. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between covariates and high-DQSJ status.Results Responses were obtained from 485 participants (25.8%), who formed the analysis cohort. The group comprised 256 females (52.8%) and 229 males (47.2%), with a mean age of 55.3 years and a median DQSJ score of 10.5. Logistic regression analysis adjusting for covariates revealed that males (reference: females) had significantly lower odds of belonging to the high-DQSJ group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43-0.89). Emotional support was significantly associated with higher odds of being in the high-DQSJ group (OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.01-2.30), while a stronger association was observed for instrumental support (OR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.52-3.58). Conversely, no statistically significant associations were observed between face-to-face and non-face-to-face contact.Conclusion This study suggests that emotional and instrumental support are important factors that contribute to improved diet quality among public assistance recipients. However, face-to-face and non-face-to-face contact did not directly impact diet quality. These findings indicate that strengthening emotional and instrumental support is effective in enhancing diet quality among public assistance recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":72032,"journal":{"name":"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Factors related to diet quality among public assistance recipients].\",\"authors\":\"Shingo Hayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.11236/jph.24-143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objectives This study aimed to identify factors associated with diet quality among public assistance recipients. Specifically, the study examined the impact of basic attributes and social isolation (emotional support, instrumental support, face-to-face contact, and non-face-to-face contact) on diet quality.Methods The participants of this survey were 1,878 public assistance recipients within the jurisdiction of the Public Health and Welfare Center, Izumi Ward, Sendai City, Miyagi Prefecture, as of October 1, 2023. As an indicator of diet quality, the \\\"Diet Quality Score for Japanese (DQSJ)\\\" was used, calculated using a 12-item simplified questionnaire. Data on DQSJ scores and social support were collected from the participants, whereas basic attributes, including sex, age, household size, household type, and employment status, were obtained from the public assistance system. Participants were classified into low- and high-DQSJ groups based on the median DQSJ score, and a descriptive analysis was conducted to assess its association with basic attributes and social support. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between covariates and high-DQSJ status.Results Responses were obtained from 485 participants (25.8%), who formed the analysis cohort. The group comprised 256 females (52.8%) and 229 males (47.2%), with a mean age of 55.3 years and a median DQSJ score of 10.5. Logistic regression analysis adjusting for covariates revealed that males (reference: females) had significantly lower odds of belonging to the high-DQSJ group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43-0.89). Emotional support was significantly associated with higher odds of being in the high-DQSJ group (OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.01-2.30), while a stronger association was observed for instrumental support (OR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.52-3.58). Conversely, no statistically significant associations were observed between face-to-face and non-face-to-face contact.Conclusion This study suggests that emotional and instrumental support are important factors that contribute to improved diet quality among public assistance recipients. However, face-to-face and non-face-to-face contact did not directly impact diet quality. These findings indicate that strengthening emotional and instrumental support is effective in enhancing diet quality among public assistance recipients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11236/jph.24-143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11236/jph.24-143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在确定与公共援助受助人饮食质量相关的因素。具体来说,该研究考察了基本属性和社会隔离(情感支持、工具支持、面对面接触和非面对面接触)对饮食质量的影响。方法调查对象为截至2023年10月1日,宫城县仙台市泉区公共卫生福利中心辖区内的1878名公共救助受助人。饮食质量指标采用“日本人饮食质量评分(DQSJ)”,采用12项简化问卷进行计算。DQSJ得分和社会支持数据来自参与者,而基本属性,包括性别、年龄、家庭规模、家庭类型和就业状况,则来自公共援助系统。根据DQSJ得分中位数,将被试分为低DQSJ组和高DQSJ组,并对其与基本属性和社会支持的关系进行描述性分析。采用Logistic回归分析评价协变量与高dqsj状态之间的关系。结果485名参与者(25.8%)获得应答,构成分析队列。其中女性256例(52.8%),男性229例(47.2%),平均年龄55.3岁,DQSJ中位评分10.5。经协变量调整后的Logistic回归分析显示,男性(参考文献:女性)属于高dqsj组的几率明显较低(优势比[OR] = 0.61, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.43-0.89)。情感支持与高dqsj组的高几率显著相关(OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.01-2.30),而工具支持的相关性更强(OR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.52-3.58)。相反,面对面和非面对面接触之间没有统计学上的显著关联。结论情绪支持和工具支持是公共援助受助人改善饮食质量的重要因素。然而,面对面和非面对面的接触并没有直接影响饮食质量。这些发现表明,加强情感和工具支持对提高公共援助受助人的饮食质量是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Factors related to diet quality among public assistance recipients].

Objectives This study aimed to identify factors associated with diet quality among public assistance recipients. Specifically, the study examined the impact of basic attributes and social isolation (emotional support, instrumental support, face-to-face contact, and non-face-to-face contact) on diet quality.Methods The participants of this survey were 1,878 public assistance recipients within the jurisdiction of the Public Health and Welfare Center, Izumi Ward, Sendai City, Miyagi Prefecture, as of October 1, 2023. As an indicator of diet quality, the "Diet Quality Score for Japanese (DQSJ)" was used, calculated using a 12-item simplified questionnaire. Data on DQSJ scores and social support were collected from the participants, whereas basic attributes, including sex, age, household size, household type, and employment status, were obtained from the public assistance system. Participants were classified into low- and high-DQSJ groups based on the median DQSJ score, and a descriptive analysis was conducted to assess its association with basic attributes and social support. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between covariates and high-DQSJ status.Results Responses were obtained from 485 participants (25.8%), who formed the analysis cohort. The group comprised 256 females (52.8%) and 229 males (47.2%), with a mean age of 55.3 years and a median DQSJ score of 10.5. Logistic regression analysis adjusting for covariates revealed that males (reference: females) had significantly lower odds of belonging to the high-DQSJ group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43-0.89). Emotional support was significantly associated with higher odds of being in the high-DQSJ group (OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.01-2.30), while a stronger association was observed for instrumental support (OR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.52-3.58). Conversely, no statistically significant associations were observed between face-to-face and non-face-to-face contact.Conclusion This study suggests that emotional and instrumental support are important factors that contribute to improved diet quality among public assistance recipients. However, face-to-face and non-face-to-face contact did not directly impact diet quality. These findings indicate that strengthening emotional and instrumental support is effective in enhancing diet quality among public assistance recipients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信