Birgitte M Visch, Daphne van der Veen, Luuk Smeets, Roland Toeter, Arianne van Bon, Diana Romijn
{"title":"糖尿病足溃疡患者伤口敷料接触性过敏的患病率(PAID研究),一项观察性前瞻性试验。","authors":"Birgitte M Visch, Daphne van der Veen, Luuk Smeets, Roland Toeter, Arianne van Bon, Diana Romijn","doi":"10.1177/15347346251332028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This investigator initiated prospective observational study investigates the prevalence of contact allergies in patients with a Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU). Patients with a DFU received a combined PATCH-test (a test used to investigate the origin of an allergic reaction on the skin) at the upper back, with the European baseline series, the European leg ulcer series, and local used material for leg ulcers. A total of 108 patients with DFU were included of which 86 (79.6%) were male, and 9 (8.3%) and 99 (91.7%) patients had Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, respectively. Twenty-one patients had a sensitization in the standard series, 30 patients in the leg ulcer series, and 11 patients in both series. Two patients had a positive reaction for one of the local used materials. Most frequent sensitizations were found for Perubalsem (N = 6) and Fragrance-Mix II (N = 4) in the standard series. A sensitization for Povidone-Iodine (N = 20) was most frequently seen in the leg ulcer series. In the local used materials a sensitization for silver sulfadiazine (N = 1) and cutimed-gel (n = 1) were seen. In conclusion, this study provides novel information about sensitizations in patients with DFU, but more research is needed to demonstrate the relationship between allergic reactions and delayed wound healing. The study protocol was registered in www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04085705, PAID study).</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":" ","pages":"15347346251332028"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Prevalence of Contact Allergies for Wound Dressings in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers (PAID Study), an Observational Prospective Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Birgitte M Visch, Daphne van der Veen, Luuk Smeets, Roland Toeter, Arianne van Bon, Diana Romijn\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15347346251332028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This investigator initiated prospective observational study investigates the prevalence of contact allergies in patients with a Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU). Patients with a DFU received a combined PATCH-test (a test used to investigate the origin of an allergic reaction on the skin) at the upper back, with the European baseline series, the European leg ulcer series, and local used material for leg ulcers. A total of 108 patients with DFU were included of which 86 (79.6%) were male, and 9 (8.3%) and 99 (91.7%) patients had Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, respectively. Twenty-one patients had a sensitization in the standard series, 30 patients in the leg ulcer series, and 11 patients in both series. Two patients had a positive reaction for one of the local used materials. Most frequent sensitizations were found for Perubalsem (N = 6) and Fragrance-Mix II (N = 4) in the standard series. A sensitization for Povidone-Iodine (N = 20) was most frequently seen in the leg ulcer series. In the local used materials a sensitization for silver sulfadiazine (N = 1) and cutimed-gel (n = 1) were seen. In conclusion, this study provides novel information about sensitizations in patients with DFU, but more research is needed to demonstrate the relationship between allergic reactions and delayed wound healing. The study protocol was registered in www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04085705, PAID study).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The international journal of lower extremity wounds\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15347346251332028\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The international journal of lower extremity wounds\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251332028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251332028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Prevalence of Contact Allergies for Wound Dressings in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers (PAID Study), an Observational Prospective Trial.
This investigator initiated prospective observational study investigates the prevalence of contact allergies in patients with a Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU). Patients with a DFU received a combined PATCH-test (a test used to investigate the origin of an allergic reaction on the skin) at the upper back, with the European baseline series, the European leg ulcer series, and local used material for leg ulcers. A total of 108 patients with DFU were included of which 86 (79.6%) were male, and 9 (8.3%) and 99 (91.7%) patients had Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, respectively. Twenty-one patients had a sensitization in the standard series, 30 patients in the leg ulcer series, and 11 patients in both series. Two patients had a positive reaction for one of the local used materials. Most frequent sensitizations were found for Perubalsem (N = 6) and Fragrance-Mix II (N = 4) in the standard series. A sensitization for Povidone-Iodine (N = 20) was most frequently seen in the leg ulcer series. In the local used materials a sensitization for silver sulfadiazine (N = 1) and cutimed-gel (n = 1) were seen. In conclusion, this study provides novel information about sensitizations in patients with DFU, but more research is needed to demonstrate the relationship between allergic reactions and delayed wound healing. The study protocol was registered in www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04085705, PAID study).