运用权威知识,更好地了解母乳喂养的准备工作。

IF 2.3 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2025-03-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2025.1540376
Margaret S Butler, Sera L Young, Lauren Keenan-Devlin
{"title":"运用权威知识,更好地了解母乳喂养的准备工作。","authors":"Margaret S Butler, Sera L Young, Lauren Keenan-Devlin","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2025.1540376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In this qualitative study, we employ the construct of authoritative knowledge to better understand how birthing people prepare for breastfeeding experiences postpartum. This construct has seldom been applied to the postpartum period, despite its application by reproductive anthropologists to pregnancy and childbirth experiences cross-culturally. Consistent with these applications, we define authoritative knowledge domains by the purveyors. We aimed to characterize the acquisition and valuation of information sources participants used to prepare for breastfeeding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-five participants were recruited from a hospital-based pregnancy study in Chicagoland, Illinois, USA to complete interviews between November 2020 and March 2021. Audio recorded interviews were coded using <i>a priori</i> themes and iterative code development. Codes were used to characterize information sources and the designation of three domains of authoritative knowledge: biomedical, social network, and lived experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All participants received information about breastfeeding from both biomedical and social network domains, with those with prior child rearing experiences also using the personal experience domain. Use of online resources like pregnancy tracking apps and social media platforms resulted in the domains of authoritative knowledge overlapping. Participants valued information from health care providers the most but found social network information was more accessible and fulfilled their desire for experiential information.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this first application of authoritative knowledge within the context of infant feeding, participants consistently cited biomedical sources as the most accurate and important. However, they cited barriers to gaining this information such as the short duration of prenatal appointments and the challenge of completing prenatal education courses. Many participants sought evidence-based information about breastfeeding on apps, social media, and websites, however content and quality across platforms varies significantly. This may be an avenue to improve access to reliable and helpful breastfeeding information.</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"6 ","pages":"1540376"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11994699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying authoritative knowledge to better understand preparation for breastfeeding.\",\"authors\":\"Margaret S Butler, Sera L Young, Lauren Keenan-Devlin\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fgwh.2025.1540376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In this qualitative study, we employ the construct of authoritative knowledge to better understand how birthing people prepare for breastfeeding experiences postpartum. This construct has seldom been applied to the postpartum period, despite its application by reproductive anthropologists to pregnancy and childbirth experiences cross-culturally. Consistent with these applications, we define authoritative knowledge domains by the purveyors. We aimed to characterize the acquisition and valuation of information sources participants used to prepare for breastfeeding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-five participants were recruited from a hospital-based pregnancy study in Chicagoland, Illinois, USA to complete interviews between November 2020 and March 2021. Audio recorded interviews were coded using <i>a priori</i> themes and iterative code development. Codes were used to characterize information sources and the designation of three domains of authoritative knowledge: biomedical, social network, and lived experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All participants received information about breastfeeding from both biomedical and social network domains, with those with prior child rearing experiences also using the personal experience domain. Use of online resources like pregnancy tracking apps and social media platforms resulted in the domains of authoritative knowledge overlapping. Participants valued information from health care providers the most but found social network information was more accessible and fulfilled their desire for experiential information.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this first application of authoritative knowledge within the context of infant feeding, participants consistently cited biomedical sources as the most accurate and important. However, they cited barriers to gaining this information such as the short duration of prenatal appointments and the challenge of completing prenatal education courses. Many participants sought evidence-based information about breastfeeding on apps, social media, and websites, however content and quality across platforms varies significantly. This may be an avenue to improve access to reliable and helpful breastfeeding information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in global women's health\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"1540376\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11994699/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in global women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1540376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1540376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在本定性研究中,我们采用权威知识的结构,以更好地了解分娩的人如何准备产后母乳喂养经历。尽管生殖人类学家将其应用于跨文化的怀孕和分娩经历,但这种结构很少应用于产后时期。与这些应用程序一致,我们由提供者定义权威的知识领域。我们的目的是描述获取和评估信息来源的参与者用来准备母乳喂养。方法:从美国伊利诺伊州芝加哥的一项医院妊娠研究中招募了25名参与者,于2020年11月至2021年3月完成访谈。录音访谈使用先验主题和迭代代码开发进行编码。代码用于描述信息源的特征,并指定三个权威知识领域:生物医学、社会网络和生活经验。结果:所有参与者都从生物医学和社会网络领域获得了母乳喂养的信息,有过育儿经历的参与者也使用了个人经验领域。使用在线资源,如孕期跟踪应用程序和社交媒体平台,导致权威知识领域重叠。参与者最看重来自医疗保健提供者的信息,但发现社交网络信息更容易获取,并满足了他们对经验信息的渴望。讨论:在婴儿喂养背景下首次应用权威知识时,参与者一致认为生物医学来源是最准确和最重要的。然而,他们提到了获得这些信息的障碍,如产前预约时间短和完成产前教育课程的挑战。许多参与者在应用程序、社交媒体和网站上寻找有关母乳喂养的循证信息,但不同平台的内容和质量差异很大。这可能是改善获得可靠和有用的母乳喂养信息的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applying authoritative knowledge to better understand preparation for breastfeeding.

Introduction: In this qualitative study, we employ the construct of authoritative knowledge to better understand how birthing people prepare for breastfeeding experiences postpartum. This construct has seldom been applied to the postpartum period, despite its application by reproductive anthropologists to pregnancy and childbirth experiences cross-culturally. Consistent with these applications, we define authoritative knowledge domains by the purveyors. We aimed to characterize the acquisition and valuation of information sources participants used to prepare for breastfeeding.

Methods: Twenty-five participants were recruited from a hospital-based pregnancy study in Chicagoland, Illinois, USA to complete interviews between November 2020 and March 2021. Audio recorded interviews were coded using a priori themes and iterative code development. Codes were used to characterize information sources and the designation of three domains of authoritative knowledge: biomedical, social network, and lived experience.

Results: All participants received information about breastfeeding from both biomedical and social network domains, with those with prior child rearing experiences also using the personal experience domain. Use of online resources like pregnancy tracking apps and social media platforms resulted in the domains of authoritative knowledge overlapping. Participants valued information from health care providers the most but found social network information was more accessible and fulfilled their desire for experiential information.

Discussion: In this first application of authoritative knowledge within the context of infant feeding, participants consistently cited biomedical sources as the most accurate and important. However, they cited barriers to gaining this information such as the short duration of prenatal appointments and the challenge of completing prenatal education courses. Many participants sought evidence-based information about breastfeeding on apps, social media, and websites, however content and quality across platforms varies significantly. This may be an avenue to improve access to reliable and helpful breastfeeding information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信