球孢白僵菌对棉铃虫(Helicoverpa armigera)的致病性。

IF 2.4 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
Frontiers in insect science Pub Date : 2025-04-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/finsc.2025.1552694
Rachid Boulamtat, Karim El Fakhouri, Hassna Jaber, Ali Oubayoucef, Chaimae Ramdani, Nabil Fikraoui, Muamar Al-Jaboobi, Meryem El Fadil, Ilyass Maafa, Abdelhalem Mesfioui, Seid Ahmed Kemal, Mustapha El Bouhssini
{"title":"球孢白僵菌对棉铃虫(Helicoverpa armigera)的致病性。","authors":"Rachid Boulamtat, Karim El Fakhouri, Hassna Jaber, Ali Oubayoucef, Chaimae Ramdani, Nabil Fikraoui, Muamar Al-Jaboobi, Meryem El Fadil, Ilyass Maafa, Abdelhalem Mesfioui, Seid Ahmed Kemal, Mustapha El Bouhssini","doi":"10.3389/finsc.2025.1552694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The destructive pest of chickpeas, <i>Helicoverpa armigera</i> (Hübner), is difficult to control using synthetic insecticides. The current research examined the entomopathogenic and endophytic colonisation effects of three fungal strains of <i>Beauveria bassiana</i> (HASS; RFSL10; SP-IR-566) against <i>H. armigera</i> larvae under laboratory, greenhouse, and field conditions. Four inoculation methods were used in the greenhouse: Root Dipping (RD), Leaf Spraying (LS), Stem Injection (SI), and Seed Coating (SC), while spray application was used for laboratory and field treatments. Under laboratory conditions, the highest entomopathogenic effect was recorded by HASS and RFSL10 strains applied as a direct spray at 10<sup>8</sup> conidia mL<sup>-1</sup> with 100% mortality, followed by SP-IR-566 with 96%, 12 days after treatment. Furthermore, foliar application in the field reduced larval population by an average ranging from 82 to 100%, confirming the significant effects of the three tested strains. In terms of endophytic colonisation under greenhouse setting, both stem injection and root dipping methods expressed low to moderate mortality rates ranging from 32 to 40%, 15 days after application. These findings suggested that <i>B. bassiana</i> strains, investigated as foliar application, had a potential as an effective strategy to control <i>H. armigera.</i> This study also offers new insights into the potential of the endophytic entomopathogens approach as a viable and safe alternative to chemical pesticides.</p>","PeriodicalId":517424,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in insect science","volume":"5 ","pages":"1552694"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pathogenicity of entomopathogenic <i>Beauveria bassiana</i> strains on <i>Helicoverpa armigera</i> (Hübner).\",\"authors\":\"Rachid Boulamtat, Karim El Fakhouri, Hassna Jaber, Ali Oubayoucef, Chaimae Ramdani, Nabil Fikraoui, Muamar Al-Jaboobi, Meryem El Fadil, Ilyass Maafa, Abdelhalem Mesfioui, Seid Ahmed Kemal, Mustapha El Bouhssini\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/finsc.2025.1552694\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The destructive pest of chickpeas, <i>Helicoverpa armigera</i> (Hübner), is difficult to control using synthetic insecticides. The current research examined the entomopathogenic and endophytic colonisation effects of three fungal strains of <i>Beauveria bassiana</i> (HASS; RFSL10; SP-IR-566) against <i>H. armigera</i> larvae under laboratory, greenhouse, and field conditions. Four inoculation methods were used in the greenhouse: Root Dipping (RD), Leaf Spraying (LS), Stem Injection (SI), and Seed Coating (SC), while spray application was used for laboratory and field treatments. Under laboratory conditions, the highest entomopathogenic effect was recorded by HASS and RFSL10 strains applied as a direct spray at 10<sup>8</sup> conidia mL<sup>-1</sup> with 100% mortality, followed by SP-IR-566 with 96%, 12 days after treatment. Furthermore, foliar application in the field reduced larval population by an average ranging from 82 to 100%, confirming the significant effects of the three tested strains. In terms of endophytic colonisation under greenhouse setting, both stem injection and root dipping methods expressed low to moderate mortality rates ranging from 32 to 40%, 15 days after application. These findings suggested that <i>B. bassiana</i> strains, investigated as foliar application, had a potential as an effective strategy to control <i>H. armigera.</i> This study also offers new insights into the potential of the endophytic entomopathogens approach as a viable and safe alternative to chemical pesticides.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":517424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in insect science\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"1552694\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022900/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in insect science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/finsc.2025.1552694\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in insect science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/finsc.2025.1552694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鹰嘴豆的破坏性害虫,Helicoverpa armigera (h bner),很难用合成杀虫剂控制。本研究对球孢白僵菌(Beauveria bassiana, HASS;RFSL10;SP-IR-566)在实验室、温室和田间条件下对棉铃虫幼虫有效。温室采用浸根(RD)、喷叶(LS)、喷茎(SI)和包种(SC) 4种接种方法,室内和田间均采用喷施。在实验室条件下,HASS和RFSL10菌株直接喷施于108株分生孢子mL-1,致虫率最高,为100%;SP-IR-566在喷施12 d后致虫率为96%。此外,田间叶面施用可使幼虫数量平均减少82%至100%,证实了三种被试菌株的显著效果。在温室环境下,茎注法和浸根法均表现出较低至中等的死亡率,施用15天后死亡率为32% ~ 40%。这些结果表明,将球孢白僵菌菌株作为叶面施用,有可能成为防治棉蚜的有效策略。该研究也为内生昆虫病原体方法作为一种可行且安全的化学农药替代品的潜力提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pathogenicity of entomopathogenic Beauveria bassiana strains on Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner).

The destructive pest of chickpeas, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner), is difficult to control using synthetic insecticides. The current research examined the entomopathogenic and endophytic colonisation effects of three fungal strains of Beauveria bassiana (HASS; RFSL10; SP-IR-566) against H. armigera larvae under laboratory, greenhouse, and field conditions. Four inoculation methods were used in the greenhouse: Root Dipping (RD), Leaf Spraying (LS), Stem Injection (SI), and Seed Coating (SC), while spray application was used for laboratory and field treatments. Under laboratory conditions, the highest entomopathogenic effect was recorded by HASS and RFSL10 strains applied as a direct spray at 108 conidia mL-1 with 100% mortality, followed by SP-IR-566 with 96%, 12 days after treatment. Furthermore, foliar application in the field reduced larval population by an average ranging from 82 to 100%, confirming the significant effects of the three tested strains. In terms of endophytic colonisation under greenhouse setting, both stem injection and root dipping methods expressed low to moderate mortality rates ranging from 32 to 40%, 15 days after application. These findings suggested that B. bassiana strains, investigated as foliar application, had a potential as an effective strategy to control H. armigera. This study also offers new insights into the potential of the endophytic entomopathogens approach as a viable and safe alternative to chemical pesticides.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信