Leon S Edwards, Cecilia Cappelen-Smith, Dennis Cordato, Andrew Bivard, Leonid Churilov, Longting Lin, Chushuang Chen, Carlos Garcia-Esperon, Mark W Parsons
{"title":"优化后循环梗死(POCI)的CT灌注(CTP): POCI CTP后处理算法的综合分析。","authors":"Leon S Edwards, Cecilia Cappelen-Smith, Dennis Cordato, Andrew Bivard, Leonid Churilov, Longting Lin, Chushuang Chen, Carlos Garcia-Esperon, Mark W Parsons","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>CTP Software packages utilise various mathematical techniques to transform source data into clinically useful maps. These techniques have not been validated for Posterior circulation infarction (POCI). Studies of anterior circulation stroke have shown that algorithm differences significantly influence the accuracy and best tissue parameters and thresholds of output maps. We examined the influence of the processing algorithm on CTP accuracy and best tissue parameters and thresholds in acute POCI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data were analysed from patients diagnosed with a POCI enrolled in the International-stroke-perfusionimaging-registry (INSPIRE). Fifty-eight-patients with baseline multimodal-CT with occlusion of a large posterior-circulation artery and follow up diffusion-weighted-MRI at 24-48 hours were included. CTP parametric maps were generated using five algorithms; Singular value deconvolution, Singular value deconvolution with delay and dispersion correction (SVDd), Partial-deconvolution, Stroke-stenosis and Maximum Slope models. Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis and linear regression were used for voxel-based analysis and volume-based analysis respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Partial-deconvolution using the Mean Transit Time (MTT) parameter was the optimal technique for characterising ischaemic-penumbra (AUC=0.73 [0.64-0.81]) and infarct-core (AUC=0.70 [0.63-0.73]). The optimal MTT threshold was >165% and >180% for core and penumbra respectively. The optimal MTT threshold was >165% and >180% for core and penumbra respectively. By volume analysis; the SVDd and Maximum Slope (MS) using MTT were the best algorithms for estimation of penumbra and core respectively. Estimates of core volume were weak (all R<sup>2</sup><0.02). Processing algorithm influenced model accuracy (AUC-range: 0.700.73 [core], 0.67-0.72 [penumbra]) and optimal tissue parameter and threshold. MTT was the most consistent optimal parameter across algorithms. The optimal MTT threshold varied from >120% to >200% for core and 155% to 195% for penumbra.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CTP has diagnostic utility in POCI. There were notable differences in optimal parameter and threshold by algorithm. Clinicians should be aware of the specific algorithm used in their CTP processing software and apply caution when comparing output maps between vendors.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>CTP = CT Perfusion; POCI = Posterior circulation infarction, ACS = Anterior circulation stroke, ROC = Reciever operating curve, AUC = Area under the curve, SVD = Singular value deconvolution, SVDd = Singular value deconvolution with delay and dispersion correction, MTT = Mean transit Time, TTP = Time to Peak, DT = Delay time, TMax = Time to maximum of the tissue resiude curve, CBV = Cerebral blood volume, CBF = Cerebral blood flow, AIF = Arterial input function, VOF = Venous output function, EVT = endovascular thrombectomy, mRS = modified rankin score, LKW = Last known well, MVD = mean volumetric difference.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimising CT Perfusion (CTP) in Posterior circulation infarction (POCI): A comprehensive analysis of CTP postprocessing algorithms for POCI.\",\"authors\":\"Leon S Edwards, Cecilia Cappelen-Smith, Dennis Cordato, Andrew Bivard, Leonid Churilov, Longting Lin, Chushuang Chen, Carlos Garcia-Esperon, Mark W Parsons\",\"doi\":\"10.3174/ajnr.A8833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>CTP Software packages utilise various mathematical techniques to transform source data into clinically useful maps. These techniques have not been validated for Posterior circulation infarction (POCI). Studies of anterior circulation stroke have shown that algorithm differences significantly influence the accuracy and best tissue parameters and thresholds of output maps. We examined the influence of the processing algorithm on CTP accuracy and best tissue parameters and thresholds in acute POCI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data were analysed from patients diagnosed with a POCI enrolled in the International-stroke-perfusionimaging-registry (INSPIRE). Fifty-eight-patients with baseline multimodal-CT with occlusion of a large posterior-circulation artery and follow up diffusion-weighted-MRI at 24-48 hours were included. CTP parametric maps were generated using five algorithms; Singular value deconvolution, Singular value deconvolution with delay and dispersion correction (SVDd), Partial-deconvolution, Stroke-stenosis and Maximum Slope models. Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis and linear regression were used for voxel-based analysis and volume-based analysis respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Partial-deconvolution using the Mean Transit Time (MTT) parameter was the optimal technique for characterising ischaemic-penumbra (AUC=0.73 [0.64-0.81]) and infarct-core (AUC=0.70 [0.63-0.73]). The optimal MTT threshold was >165% and >180% for core and penumbra respectively. The optimal MTT threshold was >165% and >180% for core and penumbra respectively. By volume analysis; the SVDd and Maximum Slope (MS) using MTT were the best algorithms for estimation of penumbra and core respectively. Estimates of core volume were weak (all R<sup>2</sup><0.02). Processing algorithm influenced model accuracy (AUC-range: 0.700.73 [core], 0.67-0.72 [penumbra]) and optimal tissue parameter and threshold. MTT was the most consistent optimal parameter across algorithms. The optimal MTT threshold varied from >120% to >200% for core and 155% to 195% for penumbra.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CTP has diagnostic utility in POCI. There were notable differences in optimal parameter and threshold by algorithm. Clinicians should be aware of the specific algorithm used in their CTP processing software and apply caution when comparing output maps between vendors.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>CTP = CT Perfusion; POCI = Posterior circulation infarction, ACS = Anterior circulation stroke, ROC = Reciever operating curve, AUC = Area under the curve, SVD = Singular value deconvolution, SVDd = Singular value deconvolution with delay and dispersion correction, MTT = Mean transit Time, TTP = Time to Peak, DT = Delay time, TMax = Time to maximum of the tissue resiude curve, CBV = Cerebral blood volume, CBF = Cerebral blood flow, AIF = Arterial input function, VOF = Venous output function, EVT = endovascular thrombectomy, mRS = modified rankin score, LKW = Last known well, MVD = mean volumetric difference.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8833\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:CTP软件包利用各种数学技术将源数据转换为临床有用的地图。这些技术尚未在后循环梗塞(POCI)中得到验证。对前循环卒中的研究表明,算法差异显著影响输出图的准确性和最佳组织参数和阈值。我们研究了处理算法对急性POCI的CTP精度和最佳组织参数和阈值的影响。材料和方法:对国际脑卒中灌注成像登记(INSPIRE)中诊断为POCI的患者的数据进行分析。包括58例基线多模态ct合并大后循环动脉闭塞的患者,并在24-48小时随访弥散加权mri。采用五种算法生成CTP参数图;奇异值反褶积,奇异值反褶积与延迟和色散校正(SVDd),部分反褶积,卒中-狭窄和最大斜率模型。基于体素的分析采用受试者工作曲线(ROC)分析,基于体素的分析采用线性回归分析。结果:使用平均传输时间(MTT)参数进行部分反卷积是表征缺血-半影区(AUC=0.73[0.64-0.81])和梗死-核心区(AUC=0.70[0.63-0.73])的最佳技术。核心和半影区的最佳MTT阈值分别为>165%和>180%。核心和半影区的最佳MTT阈值分别为>165%和>180%。通过体积分析;使用MTT的SVDd和最大斜率(MS)分别是估计半影和核心的最佳算法。岩心体积的估计较弱(岩心的R2120%至bb10200%,半影区的155%至195%)。结论:CTP对POCI有诊断价值。两种算法在最优参数和阈值上存在显著差异。临床医生应该意识到他们的CTP处理软件中使用的具体算法,并在比较供应商之间的输出图时要谨慎。缩写:CTP = CT灌注;POCI =后循环梗死,ACS =前循环中风,民国=接收者操作曲线,AUC =曲线下的面积,计算=奇异值反褶积,SVDd =奇异值反褶积和延迟色散修正,MTT =平均运输时间,TTP =时间达到峰值,DT =延迟时间,达峰时间=时间组织resiude曲线的最大,CBV =脑血容量,CBF =脑血流量,如果=动脉输入函数,受到=静脉输出函数,EVT =血管内取栓术,mRS =改良rank评分,LKW = Last known well, MVD =平均容积差。
Optimising CT Perfusion (CTP) in Posterior circulation infarction (POCI): A comprehensive analysis of CTP postprocessing algorithms for POCI.
Background and purpose: CTP Software packages utilise various mathematical techniques to transform source data into clinically useful maps. These techniques have not been validated for Posterior circulation infarction (POCI). Studies of anterior circulation stroke have shown that algorithm differences significantly influence the accuracy and best tissue parameters and thresholds of output maps. We examined the influence of the processing algorithm on CTP accuracy and best tissue parameters and thresholds in acute POCI.
Materials and methods: Data were analysed from patients diagnosed with a POCI enrolled in the International-stroke-perfusionimaging-registry (INSPIRE). Fifty-eight-patients with baseline multimodal-CT with occlusion of a large posterior-circulation artery and follow up diffusion-weighted-MRI at 24-48 hours were included. CTP parametric maps were generated using five algorithms; Singular value deconvolution, Singular value deconvolution with delay and dispersion correction (SVDd), Partial-deconvolution, Stroke-stenosis and Maximum Slope models. Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis and linear regression were used for voxel-based analysis and volume-based analysis respectively.
Results: Partial-deconvolution using the Mean Transit Time (MTT) parameter was the optimal technique for characterising ischaemic-penumbra (AUC=0.73 [0.64-0.81]) and infarct-core (AUC=0.70 [0.63-0.73]). The optimal MTT threshold was >165% and >180% for core and penumbra respectively. The optimal MTT threshold was >165% and >180% for core and penumbra respectively. By volume analysis; the SVDd and Maximum Slope (MS) using MTT were the best algorithms for estimation of penumbra and core respectively. Estimates of core volume were weak (all R2<0.02). Processing algorithm influenced model accuracy (AUC-range: 0.700.73 [core], 0.67-0.72 [penumbra]) and optimal tissue parameter and threshold. MTT was the most consistent optimal parameter across algorithms. The optimal MTT threshold varied from >120% to >200% for core and 155% to 195% for penumbra.
Conclusions: CTP has diagnostic utility in POCI. There were notable differences in optimal parameter and threshold by algorithm. Clinicians should be aware of the specific algorithm used in their CTP processing software and apply caution when comparing output maps between vendors.
Abbreviations: CTP = CT Perfusion; POCI = Posterior circulation infarction, ACS = Anterior circulation stroke, ROC = Reciever operating curve, AUC = Area under the curve, SVD = Singular value deconvolution, SVDd = Singular value deconvolution with delay and dispersion correction, MTT = Mean transit Time, TTP = Time to Peak, DT = Delay time, TMax = Time to maximum of the tissue resiude curve, CBV = Cerebral blood volume, CBF = Cerebral blood flow, AIF = Arterial input function, VOF = Venous output function, EVT = endovascular thrombectomy, mRS = modified rankin score, LKW = Last known well, MVD = mean volumetric difference.