对日常道德困境的大规模调查。

IF 2.2 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PNAS nexus Pub Date : 2025-05-13 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf119
Daniel Alexander Yudkin, Geoffrey Philip Goodwin, Andrew Reece, Kurt Gray, Sudeep Bhatia
{"title":"对日常道德困境的大规模调查。","authors":"Daniel Alexander Yudkin, Geoffrey Philip Goodwin, Andrew Reece, Kurt Gray, Sudeep Bhatia","doi":"10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Questions of right and wrong are central to daily life, yet scientific understanding of everyday moral dilemmas is limited. We conducted a data-driven analysis of these phenomena by combining state-of-the-art tools in machine learning with survey-based methods. We extracted and analyzed 369,161 descriptions (\"posts\") and 11 M evaluations (\"comments\") of dilemmas from the largest known online repository of everyday moral dilemmas: Reddit's \"Am I the Asshole?\" Users described a wide variety of everyday dilemmas on topics ranging from broken promises to privately held emotions. Dilemmas involving relational obligations were the most frequently reported, while those pertaining to honesty were the most frequently condemned. The types of dilemmas people experienced depended on the interpersonal closeness of the interactants, with some dilemmas (e.g. politeness) more prominent in distant-other interactions and others (e.g. relational transgressions) more prominent in close-other interactions. A preregistered follow-up investigation showed that similar dilemmas are reported in a census-stratified representative sample of the US population (<i>n</i> = 510). Overall, this paper highlights the diversity of moral dilemmas experienced in daily life and contributes to the development of a moral psychology grounded in the vagaries of everyday experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":74468,"journal":{"name":"PNAS nexus","volume":"4 5","pages":"pgaf119"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070388/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A large-scale investigation of everyday moral dilemmas.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Alexander Yudkin, Geoffrey Philip Goodwin, Andrew Reece, Kurt Gray, Sudeep Bhatia\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Questions of right and wrong are central to daily life, yet scientific understanding of everyday moral dilemmas is limited. We conducted a data-driven analysis of these phenomena by combining state-of-the-art tools in machine learning with survey-based methods. We extracted and analyzed 369,161 descriptions (\\\"posts\\\") and 11 M evaluations (\\\"comments\\\") of dilemmas from the largest known online repository of everyday moral dilemmas: Reddit's \\\"Am I the Asshole?\\\" Users described a wide variety of everyday dilemmas on topics ranging from broken promises to privately held emotions. Dilemmas involving relational obligations were the most frequently reported, while those pertaining to honesty were the most frequently condemned. The types of dilemmas people experienced depended on the interpersonal closeness of the interactants, with some dilemmas (e.g. politeness) more prominent in distant-other interactions and others (e.g. relational transgressions) more prominent in close-other interactions. A preregistered follow-up investigation showed that similar dilemmas are reported in a census-stratified representative sample of the US population (<i>n</i> = 510). Overall, this paper highlights the diversity of moral dilemmas experienced in daily life and contributes to the development of a moral psychology grounded in the vagaries of everyday experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PNAS nexus\",\"volume\":\"4 5\",\"pages\":\"pgaf119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070388/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PNAS nexus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PNAS nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对与错的问题是日常生活的核心,然而对日常道德困境的科学理解是有限的。我们将最先进的机器学习工具与基于调查的方法相结合,对这些现象进行了数据驱动分析。我们从已知最大的日常道德困境在线存储库——Reddit的“我是混蛋吗?”中提取并分析了369,161个关于困境的描述(“帖子”)和11m个评估(“评论”)。用户描述了各种各样的日常困境,话题从未兑现的承诺到私人情绪。涉及关系义务的困境是最常被报道的,而与诚实有关的困境则是最常被谴责的。人们所经历的困境类型取决于互动者的人际亲密程度,一些困境(如礼貌)在远距离互动中更为突出,而另一些困境(如关系越轨)在近距离互动中更为突出。一项预先登记的随访调查显示,在美国人口的人口分层代表性样本(n = 510)中也报告了类似的困境。总体而言,本文强调了日常生活中经历的道德困境的多样性,并有助于以日常经验的变幻莫测为基础的道德心理学的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A large-scale investigation of everyday moral dilemmas.

Questions of right and wrong are central to daily life, yet scientific understanding of everyday moral dilemmas is limited. We conducted a data-driven analysis of these phenomena by combining state-of-the-art tools in machine learning with survey-based methods. We extracted and analyzed 369,161 descriptions ("posts") and 11 M evaluations ("comments") of dilemmas from the largest known online repository of everyday moral dilemmas: Reddit's "Am I the Asshole?" Users described a wide variety of everyday dilemmas on topics ranging from broken promises to privately held emotions. Dilemmas involving relational obligations were the most frequently reported, while those pertaining to honesty were the most frequently condemned. The types of dilemmas people experienced depended on the interpersonal closeness of the interactants, with some dilemmas (e.g. politeness) more prominent in distant-other interactions and others (e.g. relational transgressions) more prominent in close-other interactions. A preregistered follow-up investigation showed that similar dilemmas are reported in a census-stratified representative sample of the US population (n = 510). Overall, this paper highlights the diversity of moral dilemmas experienced in daily life and contributes to the development of a moral psychology grounded in the vagaries of everyday experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信