经动脉化疗栓塞联合经皮乙醇注射治疗高危区肝癌。

IF 1.3
Wencong Feng, Yapan Guo, Shitao Lu, Yu Yin, Tongqin Xue, Zhi Li
{"title":"经动脉化疗栓塞联合经皮乙醇注射治疗高危区肝癌。","authors":"Wencong Feng, Yapan Guo, Shitao Lu, Yu Yin, Tongqin Xue, Zhi Li","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_2226_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the efficacy and safety of the combination of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at high-risk areas.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data from cases involving TACE combined with PEI for HCC treatment in high-risk regions were analyzed from January 2016 to December 2023 at three medical centers. High-risk areas were defined as those less than 10 mm from the diaphragm, gallbladder, gastrointestinal tract, or secondary branches of the portal vein or bile duct. The guidance modalities for PEI were computed tomograph (CT) and cone beam computed tomograph (CBCT). Each lesion received only one session of TACE combined with PEI. Treatment efficacy was assessed by complete ablation rate of target lesions at the 2-month follow-up. Factors affecting the efficacy were determined by binary logistic regression analysis. The difference in efficacy between CT-guided and CBCT-guided PEI was analyzed by Chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 62 patients with 67 target lesions were included in the analysis. The overall complete ablation rate lesion-based was 80.6% (54/67). Lesion diameter was significantly associated with the probability of achieving complete ablation (OR = 6.89, 95% CI: 1.57-30.234, P = 0.011). There was no significant difference in the complete ablation rates between CT- and CBCT-guided approaches (83.3% vs. 80%, P = 0.867). No severe complications occurred during treatment or follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of TACE with a single PEI proves to be a safe and effective treatment for HCC in high-risk areas. There was no difference between CBCT-guided and CT-guided outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","volume":"21 2","pages":"395-400"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transarterial chemoembolization combined with percutaneous ethanol injection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma at high-risk areas.\",\"authors\":\"Wencong Feng, Yapan Guo, Shitao Lu, Yu Yin, Tongqin Xue, Zhi Li\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_2226_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the efficacy and safety of the combination of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at high-risk areas.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data from cases involving TACE combined with PEI for HCC treatment in high-risk regions were analyzed from January 2016 to December 2023 at three medical centers. High-risk areas were defined as those less than 10 mm from the diaphragm, gallbladder, gastrointestinal tract, or secondary branches of the portal vein or bile duct. The guidance modalities for PEI were computed tomograph (CT) and cone beam computed tomograph (CBCT). Each lesion received only one session of TACE combined with PEI. Treatment efficacy was assessed by complete ablation rate of target lesions at the 2-month follow-up. Factors affecting the efficacy were determined by binary logistic regression analysis. The difference in efficacy between CT-guided and CBCT-guided PEI was analyzed by Chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 62 patients with 67 target lesions were included in the analysis. The overall complete ablation rate lesion-based was 80.6% (54/67). Lesion diameter was significantly associated with the probability of achieving complete ablation (OR = 6.89, 95% CI: 1.57-30.234, P = 0.011). There was no significant difference in the complete ablation rates between CT- and CBCT-guided approaches (83.3% vs. 80%, P = 0.867). No severe complications occurred during treatment or follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of TACE with a single PEI proves to be a safe and effective treatment for HCC in high-risk areas. There was no difference between CBCT-guided and CT-guided outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"21 2\",\"pages\":\"395-400\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_2226_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_2226_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)联合经皮乙醇注射(PEI)治疗高危区肝癌的疗效和安全性。材料与方法:分析2016年1月至2023年12月三个医疗中心在高危地区采用TACE联合PEI治疗HCC的病例数据。高危区定义为距离横膈膜、胆囊、胃肠道、门静脉或胆管二次分支小于10mm的区域。PEI的引导方式为CT和锥束CT。每个病灶仅接受一次TACE联合PEI治疗。2个月随访时,以目标病灶完全消融率评价治疗效果。采用二元logistic回归分析确定影响疗效的因素。采用卡方检验分析ct引导下与cbct引导下PEI的疗效差异。结果:共纳入62例患者67个病灶。基于病灶的整体完全消融率为80.6%(54/67)。病变直径与完全消融的概率显著相关(OR = 6.89, 95% CI: 1.57-30.234, P = 0.011)。CT和cbct引导入路的完全消融率无显著差异(83.3% vs. 80%, P = 0.867)。治疗及随访期间均未发生严重并发症。结论:TACE联合单一PEI是治疗高危地区HCC安全有效的方法。cbt引导和ct引导的结果没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transarterial chemoembolization combined with percutaneous ethanol injection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma at high-risk areas.

Purpose: To analyze the efficacy and safety of the combination of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at high-risk areas.

Materials and methods: Data from cases involving TACE combined with PEI for HCC treatment in high-risk regions were analyzed from January 2016 to December 2023 at three medical centers. High-risk areas were defined as those less than 10 mm from the diaphragm, gallbladder, gastrointestinal tract, or secondary branches of the portal vein or bile duct. The guidance modalities for PEI were computed tomograph (CT) and cone beam computed tomograph (CBCT). Each lesion received only one session of TACE combined with PEI. Treatment efficacy was assessed by complete ablation rate of target lesions at the 2-month follow-up. Factors affecting the efficacy were determined by binary logistic regression analysis. The difference in efficacy between CT-guided and CBCT-guided PEI was analyzed by Chi-square test.

Results: About 62 patients with 67 target lesions were included in the analysis. The overall complete ablation rate lesion-based was 80.6% (54/67). Lesion diameter was significantly associated with the probability of achieving complete ablation (OR = 6.89, 95% CI: 1.57-30.234, P = 0.011). There was no significant difference in the complete ablation rates between CT- and CBCT-guided approaches (83.3% vs. 80%, P = 0.867). No severe complications occurred during treatment or follow-up.

Conclusion: The combination of TACE with a single PEI proves to be a safe and effective treatment for HCC in high-risk areas. There was no difference between CBCT-guided and CT-guided outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信