Joanne R Hojsak, Nelia Afonso, Kelvin Chang, Felise Milan, Robin K Ovitsh, Yoon Soo Park, Roshini Pinto-Powell, Priya Ramaiah, Ronald C Silvestri, Sarah Yonder, Deepthiman Gowda
{"title":"医学院临床技能课程中沟通技巧主题的全国调查。","authors":"Joanne R Hojsak, Nelia Afonso, Kelvin Chang, Felise Milan, Robin K Ovitsh, Yoon Soo Park, Roshini Pinto-Powell, Priya Ramaiah, Ronald C Silvestri, Sarah Yonder, Deepthiman Gowda","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000006073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This report describes findings of a survey of clinical skills educators at U.S. Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME)-accredited medical schools on the topics covered and pedagogical approaches used in preclerkship communication and interpersonal skills (CIS) curricula.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Directors of Clinical Skills Education, the largest professional society of U.S. preclerkship clinical skills medical educators, developed a cross-sectional survey addressing 33 CIS topics, their pedagogy, and assessment in preclerkship curricula. The survey was sent to 136 LCME-accredited medical schools between November 2020 and April 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to explore trends; bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to examine associations between factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results from 97 medical schools (71% response rate) identified a mean (SD) of 53 (38) hours of preclerkship curricula devoted to CIS teaching, with 2 schools (25%) reporting 24 hour or less. Schools reported teaching a mean (SD) of 22 (6) CIS topics, while assessing a mean (SD) of 14 (7). A positive association was found between the duration of CIS curricula and the number of CIS topics taught (r = 0.39, P < .001), practiced (r = 0.38, P < .001), and assessed (r = 0.29, P = .005). A mean (SD) of 22 (6) of the 33 topics were taught, 16 (7) were practiced, and 14 (7) were formatively or summatively assessed. Statistically significant regional variation was found in the teaching of 5 topics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with previous surveys, U.S. medical schools currently teach considerably more CIS topics in preclerkship curricula, reflecting a responsiveness to contemporary social and public health concerns. The expansion of CIS teaching presents challenges, including the need for more time, standardization, and assessment. Medical schools can help address these needs by adopting robust longitudinal and integrated CIS curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A National Survey of Communication Skills Topics Taught in Medical School Clinical Skills Courses.\",\"authors\":\"Joanne R Hojsak, Nelia Afonso, Kelvin Chang, Felise Milan, Robin K Ovitsh, Yoon Soo Park, Roshini Pinto-Powell, Priya Ramaiah, Ronald C Silvestri, Sarah Yonder, Deepthiman Gowda\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ACM.0000000000006073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This report describes findings of a survey of clinical skills educators at U.S. Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME)-accredited medical schools on the topics covered and pedagogical approaches used in preclerkship communication and interpersonal skills (CIS) curricula.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Directors of Clinical Skills Education, the largest professional society of U.S. preclerkship clinical skills medical educators, developed a cross-sectional survey addressing 33 CIS topics, their pedagogy, and assessment in preclerkship curricula. The survey was sent to 136 LCME-accredited medical schools between November 2020 and April 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to explore trends; bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to examine associations between factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results from 97 medical schools (71% response rate) identified a mean (SD) of 53 (38) hours of preclerkship curricula devoted to CIS teaching, with 2 schools (25%) reporting 24 hour or less. Schools reported teaching a mean (SD) of 22 (6) CIS topics, while assessing a mean (SD) of 14 (7). A positive association was found between the duration of CIS curricula and the number of CIS topics taught (r = 0.39, P < .001), practiced (r = 0.38, P < .001), and assessed (r = 0.29, P = .005). A mean (SD) of 22 (6) of the 33 topics were taught, 16 (7) were practiced, and 14 (7) were formatively or summatively assessed. Statistically significant regional variation was found in the teaching of 5 topics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with previous surveys, U.S. medical schools currently teach considerably more CIS topics in preclerkship curricula, reflecting a responsiveness to contemporary social and public health concerns. The expansion of CIS teaching presents challenges, including the need for more time, standardization, and assessment. Medical schools can help address these needs by adopting robust longitudinal and integrated CIS curricula.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000006073\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000006073","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本报告描述了对美国医学教育联络委员会(LCME)认可的医学院临床技能教育者的调查结果,调查内容涉及职前沟通和人际交往技能(CIS)课程中使用的主题和教学方法。方法:临床技能教育主任,美国最大的专业协会的临床技能医学教育工作者,开发了一个横断面调查33 CIS主题,他们的教学方法和评估在初级培训课程。该调查于2020年11月至2021年4月期间发送给136所lcme认可的医学院。描述性统计用于探索趋势;使用双变量和多变量分析来检查因素之间的关联。结果:来自97所医学院(71%的回复率)的结果表明,平均(SD) 53(38)小时的职前课程专门用于CIS教学,2所学校(25%)报告24小时或更少。学校报告教学的平均(SD)为22(6)个CIS主题,而评估的平均(SD)为14(7)个。CIS课程的持续时间与CIS主题的教授(r = 0.39, P < .001)、实践(r = 0.38, P < .001)和评估(r = 0.29, P = .005)之间存在正相关。33个主题中,平均有22(6)个被教授,16(7)个被实践,14(7)个被形成性或总结性评估。5个主题的教学存在显著的区域差异。结论:与以前的调查相比,美国医学院目前在职前课程中教授更多的CIS主题,反映了对当代社会和公共卫生问题的响应。CIS教学的扩展带来了挑战,包括需要更多的时间、标准化和评估。医学院可以通过采用强有力的纵向和综合CIS课程来帮助满足这些需求。
A National Survey of Communication Skills Topics Taught in Medical School Clinical Skills Courses.
Purpose: This report describes findings of a survey of clinical skills educators at U.S. Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME)-accredited medical schools on the topics covered and pedagogical approaches used in preclerkship communication and interpersonal skills (CIS) curricula.
Method: The Directors of Clinical Skills Education, the largest professional society of U.S. preclerkship clinical skills medical educators, developed a cross-sectional survey addressing 33 CIS topics, their pedagogy, and assessment in preclerkship curricula. The survey was sent to 136 LCME-accredited medical schools between November 2020 and April 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to explore trends; bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to examine associations between factors.
Results: Results from 97 medical schools (71% response rate) identified a mean (SD) of 53 (38) hours of preclerkship curricula devoted to CIS teaching, with 2 schools (25%) reporting 24 hour or less. Schools reported teaching a mean (SD) of 22 (6) CIS topics, while assessing a mean (SD) of 14 (7). A positive association was found between the duration of CIS curricula and the number of CIS topics taught (r = 0.39, P < .001), practiced (r = 0.38, P < .001), and assessed (r = 0.29, P = .005). A mean (SD) of 22 (6) of the 33 topics were taught, 16 (7) were practiced, and 14 (7) were formatively or summatively assessed. Statistically significant regional variation was found in the teaching of 5 topics.
Conclusions: Compared with previous surveys, U.S. medical schools currently teach considerably more CIS topics in preclerkship curricula, reflecting a responsiveness to contemporary social and public health concerns. The expansion of CIS teaching presents challenges, including the need for more time, standardization, and assessment. Medical schools can help address these needs by adopting robust longitudinal and integrated CIS curricula.
期刊介绍:
Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.