重新评估乳突压力敷料在耳科手术中的常规使用:一项随机对照试验。

Alper Tabaru, Ozgur Yigit, Salih Akyel, Zeliha Kapusuz Gencer, Iskender Bayram
{"title":"重新评估乳突压力敷料在耳科手术中的常规使用:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Alper Tabaru, Ozgur Yigit, Salih Akyel, Zeliha Kapusuz Gencer, Iskender Bayram","doi":"10.1177/01455613251333644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The use of mastoid pressure dressings (MPDs) after otologic surgery has been a standard practice for decades, believed to minimize complications such as hematoma and wound infection. However, the efficacy of MPDs in improving patient outcomes has been questioned. This study aimed to evaluate the necessity and impact of MPDs on postoperative pain, complications, and overall patient comfort.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 200 patients undergoing major ear surgeries were randomly assigned to receive either a MPD group or a non-MPD (NMPD) group. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale at the 3rd, 6th, and 24th hour. Complications, including hematoma, wound infection, and skin erythema, were systematically recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the MPD group reported significantly-higher pain levels at all measured intervals than in the NMPD group (<i>P</i> < .05). Complications such as skin erythema and auricular bruising were more prevalent in the MPD group. Importantly, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of hematomas or wound infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that MPDs may contribute to increased postoperative pain and discomfort without offering significant benefits in preventing complications. Given the lack of significant benefit and the increased patient discomfort observed with MPDs, their routine use in otologic surgery may warrant reconsideration. Future research should further explore optimal postoperative care strategies to enhance patient comfort and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93984,"journal":{"name":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","volume":" ","pages":"1455613251333644"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reevaluating the Routine Use of Mastoid Pressure Dressings in Otologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Alper Tabaru, Ozgur Yigit, Salih Akyel, Zeliha Kapusuz Gencer, Iskender Bayram\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01455613251333644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The use of mastoid pressure dressings (MPDs) after otologic surgery has been a standard practice for decades, believed to minimize complications such as hematoma and wound infection. However, the efficacy of MPDs in improving patient outcomes has been questioned. This study aimed to evaluate the necessity and impact of MPDs on postoperative pain, complications, and overall patient comfort.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 200 patients undergoing major ear surgeries were randomly assigned to receive either a MPD group or a non-MPD (NMPD) group. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale at the 3rd, 6th, and 24th hour. Complications, including hematoma, wound infection, and skin erythema, were systematically recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the MPD group reported significantly-higher pain levels at all measured intervals than in the NMPD group (<i>P</i> < .05). Complications such as skin erythema and auricular bruising were more prevalent in the MPD group. Importantly, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of hematomas or wound infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that MPDs may contribute to increased postoperative pain and discomfort without offering significant benefits in preventing complications. Given the lack of significant benefit and the increased patient discomfort observed with MPDs, their routine use in otologic surgery may warrant reconsideration. Future research should further explore optimal postoperative care strategies to enhance patient comfort and outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ear, nose, & throat journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1455613251333644\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ear, nose, & throat journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613251333644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613251333644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:几十年来,耳科手术后使用乳突压力敷料(MPDs)已成为一种标准做法,被认为可以最大限度地减少血肿和伤口感染等并发症。然而,MPDs在改善患者预后方面的有效性一直受到质疑。本研究旨在评估MPDs对术后疼痛、并发症和患者整体舒适度的必要性和影响。方法:在这项前瞻性、随机、对照试验中,200名接受大耳手术的患者被随机分配到MPD组和非MPD组。术后疼痛在第3、6、24小时用视觉模拟量表评估。系统记录血肿、伤口感染、皮肤红斑等并发症。结果:MPD组患者在所有测量间隔内的疼痛水平均显著高于NMPD组(P < 0.05)。皮肤红斑和耳部挫伤等并发症在MPD组更为常见。重要的是,两组在血肿或伤口感染的发生率上没有显著差异。结论:研究结果表明,MPDs可能会增加术后疼痛和不适,但在预防并发症方面没有明显的益处。考虑到MPDs缺乏明显的益处和患者不适的增加,它们在耳科手术中的常规使用可能需要重新考虑。未来的研究应进一步探索最佳的术后护理策略,以提高患者的舒适度和预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reevaluating the Routine Use of Mastoid Pressure Dressings in Otologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: The use of mastoid pressure dressings (MPDs) after otologic surgery has been a standard practice for decades, believed to minimize complications such as hematoma and wound infection. However, the efficacy of MPDs in improving patient outcomes has been questioned. This study aimed to evaluate the necessity and impact of MPDs on postoperative pain, complications, and overall patient comfort.

Method: In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 200 patients undergoing major ear surgeries were randomly assigned to receive either a MPD group or a non-MPD (NMPD) group. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale at the 3rd, 6th, and 24th hour. Complications, including hematoma, wound infection, and skin erythema, were systematically recorded.

Results: Patients in the MPD group reported significantly-higher pain levels at all measured intervals than in the NMPD group (P < .05). Complications such as skin erythema and auricular bruising were more prevalent in the MPD group. Importantly, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of hematomas or wound infections.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that MPDs may contribute to increased postoperative pain and discomfort without offering significant benefits in preventing complications. Given the lack of significant benefit and the increased patient discomfort observed with MPDs, their routine use in otologic surgery may warrant reconsideration. Future research should further explore optimal postoperative care strategies to enhance patient comfort and outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信