{"title":"重新评估乳突压力敷料在耳科手术中的常规使用:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Alper Tabaru, Ozgur Yigit, Salih Akyel, Zeliha Kapusuz Gencer, Iskender Bayram","doi":"10.1177/01455613251333644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The use of mastoid pressure dressings (MPDs) after otologic surgery has been a standard practice for decades, believed to minimize complications such as hematoma and wound infection. However, the efficacy of MPDs in improving patient outcomes has been questioned. This study aimed to evaluate the necessity and impact of MPDs on postoperative pain, complications, and overall patient comfort.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 200 patients undergoing major ear surgeries were randomly assigned to receive either a MPD group or a non-MPD (NMPD) group. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale at the 3rd, 6th, and 24th hour. Complications, including hematoma, wound infection, and skin erythema, were systematically recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the MPD group reported significantly-higher pain levels at all measured intervals than in the NMPD group (<i>P</i> < .05). Complications such as skin erythema and auricular bruising were more prevalent in the MPD group. Importantly, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of hematomas or wound infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that MPDs may contribute to increased postoperative pain and discomfort without offering significant benefits in preventing complications. Given the lack of significant benefit and the increased patient discomfort observed with MPDs, their routine use in otologic surgery may warrant reconsideration. Future research should further explore optimal postoperative care strategies to enhance patient comfort and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93984,"journal":{"name":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","volume":" ","pages":"1455613251333644"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reevaluating the Routine Use of Mastoid Pressure Dressings in Otologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Alper Tabaru, Ozgur Yigit, Salih Akyel, Zeliha Kapusuz Gencer, Iskender Bayram\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01455613251333644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The use of mastoid pressure dressings (MPDs) after otologic surgery has been a standard practice for decades, believed to minimize complications such as hematoma and wound infection. However, the efficacy of MPDs in improving patient outcomes has been questioned. This study aimed to evaluate the necessity and impact of MPDs on postoperative pain, complications, and overall patient comfort.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 200 patients undergoing major ear surgeries were randomly assigned to receive either a MPD group or a non-MPD (NMPD) group. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale at the 3rd, 6th, and 24th hour. Complications, including hematoma, wound infection, and skin erythema, were systematically recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the MPD group reported significantly-higher pain levels at all measured intervals than in the NMPD group (<i>P</i> < .05). Complications such as skin erythema and auricular bruising were more prevalent in the MPD group. Importantly, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of hematomas or wound infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that MPDs may contribute to increased postoperative pain and discomfort without offering significant benefits in preventing complications. Given the lack of significant benefit and the increased patient discomfort observed with MPDs, their routine use in otologic surgery may warrant reconsideration. Future research should further explore optimal postoperative care strategies to enhance patient comfort and outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ear, nose, & throat journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1455613251333644\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ear, nose, & throat journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613251333644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613251333644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reevaluating the Routine Use of Mastoid Pressure Dressings in Otologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Objective: The use of mastoid pressure dressings (MPDs) after otologic surgery has been a standard practice for decades, believed to minimize complications such as hematoma and wound infection. However, the efficacy of MPDs in improving patient outcomes has been questioned. This study aimed to evaluate the necessity and impact of MPDs on postoperative pain, complications, and overall patient comfort.
Method: In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 200 patients undergoing major ear surgeries were randomly assigned to receive either a MPD group or a non-MPD (NMPD) group. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale at the 3rd, 6th, and 24th hour. Complications, including hematoma, wound infection, and skin erythema, were systematically recorded.
Results: Patients in the MPD group reported significantly-higher pain levels at all measured intervals than in the NMPD group (P < .05). Complications such as skin erythema and auricular bruising were more prevalent in the MPD group. Importantly, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of hematomas or wound infections.
Conclusion: The findings suggest that MPDs may contribute to increased postoperative pain and discomfort without offering significant benefits in preventing complications. Given the lack of significant benefit and the increased patient discomfort observed with MPDs, their routine use in otologic surgery may warrant reconsideration. Future research should further explore optimal postoperative care strategies to enhance patient comfort and outcomes.