髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折的危险因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Annals of medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-23 DOI:10.1080/07853890.2025.2494679
Wei-Qiang Zhao, Ke-Qin Yu, Rong-Zhen Xie, Yu-Feng Liang, Jie-Feng Huang
{"title":"髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折的危险因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Wei-Qiang Zhao, Ke-Qin Yu, Rong-Zhen Xie, Yu-Feng Liang, Jie-Feng Huang","doi":"10.1080/07853890.2025.2494679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PPFF) is a serious complication following hip arthroplasty. The objective of this study was to determine the risk factors for PPFF following hip arthroplasty from existing studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive systematic search was performed in 4 databases: Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The last search was carried out on 26th July 2024. We focused on identifying risk factors for PPFF following hip arthroplasty. Study eligibility required PPFF as an outcome and reporting of associated risk factors. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), with evidence certainty evaluated via Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). Meta-analyses employed both fixed-effect and random-effects models to pool odds ratios for identified risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1553 articles, 36 studies published between 2006 and 2024 were included. Risk factors associated with increased incidence of PPFF ranges from very Low to High. High-quality evidence supported the use of uncemented stems (Odds Ratio [OR]: 3.36, 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI]: 3.02-3.74), major teaching hospital (OR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.37-3.05). Moderate-quality evidence: female gender (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.43-1.78), morbid obesity (OR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.01-2.16), higher Deyo-Charlson index (OR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.18-1.77), rheumatoid arthritis (OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.16-3.06), femoral Dorr type C (OR: 4.23, 95% CI: 2.82-6.33). Low evidence: age > 70 years (OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.19-2.34), revision hip arthroplasty (OR: 2.60, 95% CI: 1.59-4.27). BMI > 30 and history of hip surgery are not the risk (very low). Diagonized as osteoarthritis before surgery is a protective factor (OR:0.51, 95%CI: 0.40-0.65, quality = High).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis provided some low-to-high evidence about the risk of PPFF following hip arthroplasty. It's recommended that clinicians consider these risk factors when evaluating patients for hip arthroplasty and take steps to mitigate their impact, like optimizing patients health preoperatively, using cemented stems, and monitoring high-risk patients closely.</p>","PeriodicalId":93874,"journal":{"name":"Annals of medicine","volume":"57 1","pages":"2494679"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Wei-Qiang Zhao, Ke-Qin Yu, Rong-Zhen Xie, Yu-Feng Liang, Jie-Feng Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07853890.2025.2494679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PPFF) is a serious complication following hip arthroplasty. The objective of this study was to determine the risk factors for PPFF following hip arthroplasty from existing studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive systematic search was performed in 4 databases: Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The last search was carried out on 26th July 2024. We focused on identifying risk factors for PPFF following hip arthroplasty. Study eligibility required PPFF as an outcome and reporting of associated risk factors. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), with evidence certainty evaluated via Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). Meta-analyses employed both fixed-effect and random-effects models to pool odds ratios for identified risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1553 articles, 36 studies published between 2006 and 2024 were included. Risk factors associated with increased incidence of PPFF ranges from very Low to High. High-quality evidence supported the use of uncemented stems (Odds Ratio [OR]: 3.36, 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI]: 3.02-3.74), major teaching hospital (OR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.37-3.05). Moderate-quality evidence: female gender (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.43-1.78), morbid obesity (OR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.01-2.16), higher Deyo-Charlson index (OR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.18-1.77), rheumatoid arthritis (OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.16-3.06), femoral Dorr type C (OR: 4.23, 95% CI: 2.82-6.33). Low evidence: age > 70 years (OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.19-2.34), revision hip arthroplasty (OR: 2.60, 95% CI: 1.59-4.27). BMI > 30 and history of hip surgery are not the risk (very low). Diagonized as osteoarthritis before surgery is a protective factor (OR:0.51, 95%CI: 0.40-0.65, quality = High).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis provided some low-to-high evidence about the risk of PPFF following hip arthroplasty. It's recommended that clinicians consider these risk factors when evaluating patients for hip arthroplasty and take steps to mitigate their impact, like optimizing patients health preoperatively, using cemented stems, and monitoring high-risk patients closely.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of medicine\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"2494679\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2025.2494679\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2025.2494679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

股骨假体周围骨折(PPFF)是髋关节置换术后的严重并发症。本研究的目的是从现有研究中确定髋关节置换术后发生PPFF的危险因素。方法:对Pubmed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library 4个数据库进行全面系统检索。最后一次搜寻是在2024年7月26日。我们着重于确定髋关节置换术后发生PPFF的危险因素。研究资格要求将PPFF作为结果并报告相关风险因素。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)进行质量评估,通过推荐、评估、发展和评估分级(GRADE)评估证据的确定性。荟萃分析采用固定效应和随机效应模型来汇集确定风险因素的优势比。结果:在1553篇文章中,36篇发表于2006年至2024年的研究被纳入。与PPFF发病率增加相关的危险因素从极低到高不等。高质量的证据支持在主要教学医院使用非骨水泥支架(优势比[OR]: 3.36, 95%可信区间[95% CI]: 3.02-3.74) (OR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.37-3.05)。中等质量证据:女性(OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.43-1.78)、病态肥胖(OR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.01-2.16)、较高的deyao - charlson指数(OR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.18-1.77)、类风湿关节炎(OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.16-3.06)、股骨颈C型(OR: 4.23, 95% CI: 2.82-6.33)。低证据:年龄60 - 70岁(OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.19-2.34),翻修髋关节置换术(OR: 2.60, 95% CI: 1.59-4.27)。体重指数bbb30和髋关节手术史没有风险(非常低)。术前诊断为骨关节炎是一个保护因素(OR:0.51, 95%CI: 0.40-0.65,质量=高)。结论:本荟萃分析为髋关节置换术后发生PPFF的风险提供了一些从低到高的证据。建议临床医生在评估髋关节置换术患者时考虑这些风险因素,并采取措施减轻其影响,如术前优化患者健康,使用骨水泥,密切监测高危患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PPFF) is a serious complication following hip arthroplasty. The objective of this study was to determine the risk factors for PPFF following hip arthroplasty from existing studies.

Methods: A comprehensive systematic search was performed in 4 databases: Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The last search was carried out on 26th July 2024. We focused on identifying risk factors for PPFF following hip arthroplasty. Study eligibility required PPFF as an outcome and reporting of associated risk factors. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), with evidence certainty evaluated via Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). Meta-analyses employed both fixed-effect and random-effects models to pool odds ratios for identified risk factors.

Results: Out of 1553 articles, 36 studies published between 2006 and 2024 were included. Risk factors associated with increased incidence of PPFF ranges from very Low to High. High-quality evidence supported the use of uncemented stems (Odds Ratio [OR]: 3.36, 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI]: 3.02-3.74), major teaching hospital (OR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.37-3.05). Moderate-quality evidence: female gender (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.43-1.78), morbid obesity (OR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.01-2.16), higher Deyo-Charlson index (OR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.18-1.77), rheumatoid arthritis (OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.16-3.06), femoral Dorr type C (OR: 4.23, 95% CI: 2.82-6.33). Low evidence: age > 70 years (OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.19-2.34), revision hip arthroplasty (OR: 2.60, 95% CI: 1.59-4.27). BMI > 30 and history of hip surgery are not the risk (very low). Diagonized as osteoarthritis before surgery is a protective factor (OR:0.51, 95%CI: 0.40-0.65, quality = High).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis provided some low-to-high evidence about the risk of PPFF following hip arthroplasty. It's recommended that clinicians consider these risk factors when evaluating patients for hip arthroplasty and take steps to mitigate their impact, like optimizing patients health preoperatively, using cemented stems, and monitoring high-risk patients closely.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信