急性呼吸窘迫综合征持续神经肌肉阻滞期间的镇静做法。

IF 5.4
Peter J Dunbar, Ryan A Peterson, Max McGrath, Tyree H Kiser, P Michael Ho, R William Vandivier, Ellen L Burnham, Marc Moss, Peter D Sottile
{"title":"急性呼吸窘迫综合征持续神经肌肉阻滞期间的镇静做法。","authors":"Peter J Dunbar, Ryan A Peterson, Max McGrath, Tyree H Kiser, P Michael Ho, R William Vandivier, Ellen L Burnham, Marc Moss, Peter D Sottile","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202411-1225OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Neuromuscular blockade (NMB) is frequently used during acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) to improve ventilator synchrony. Which sedating medications are used concomitantly during NMB and whether sedation choice influences patient outcomes are unclear. <b>Objectives:</b> To determine national sedation practice patterns during NMB in patients with and at risk for ARDS and to establish whether the use of propofol and opioids compared with benzodiazepines and opioids is associated with improved outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> Using a U.S. national database from 2010 to 2021, intubated and mechanically ventilated patients receiving NMB for a diagnosis of ARDS or an ARDS risk factor over at least two hospital days after admission were included. Charges for sedation and analgesia during the first two hospital days were recorded for each patient. The relationships between propofol and opioids and between benzodiazepines and opioids, with a primary outcome of ventilator-free days, as well as secondary outcomes of 28-day survival and discharge home were examined in multivariable analyses. <b>Results:</b> We determined that the use of propofol has increased compared with that of benzodiazepines as the primary sedative used during NMB for ARDS. Compared with benzodiazepine and opioid use, propofol and opioid use during NMB for ARDS was associated with increased ventilator-free days (adjusted odds ratio, 1.38 [95% confidence interval, 1.24-1.54]), greater odds for survival at 28 days (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15 [95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.31]), and greater odds for discharge home (adjusted odds ratio, 1.26 [95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.46]), adjusting for patient-level and hospital-level characteristics. <b>Conclusions:</b> From 2010 to 2021, sedation practice during NMB for ARDS shifted from predominately benzodiazepine use to predominately propofol use. The use of propofol and opioids is associated with an increase in ventilator-free days compared with the use of benzodiazepines and opioids. These results suggest that sedation choice during NMB for ARDS may affect clinical outcomes; further investigation is needed to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":"1394-1400"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sedation Practices during Continuous Neuromuscular Blockade for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Peter J Dunbar, Ryan A Peterson, Max McGrath, Tyree H Kiser, P Michael Ho, R William Vandivier, Ellen L Burnham, Marc Moss, Peter D Sottile\",\"doi\":\"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202411-1225OC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Neuromuscular blockade (NMB) is frequently used during acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) to improve ventilator synchrony. Which sedating medications are used concomitantly during NMB and whether sedation choice influences patient outcomes are unclear. <b>Objectives:</b> To determine national sedation practice patterns during NMB in patients with and at risk for ARDS and to establish whether the use of propofol and opioids compared with benzodiazepines and opioids is associated with improved outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> Using a U.S. national database from 2010 to 2021, intubated and mechanically ventilated patients receiving NMB for a diagnosis of ARDS or an ARDS risk factor over at least two hospital days after admission were included. Charges for sedation and analgesia during the first two hospital days were recorded for each patient. The relationships between propofol and opioids and between benzodiazepines and opioids, with a primary outcome of ventilator-free days, as well as secondary outcomes of 28-day survival and discharge home were examined in multivariable analyses. <b>Results:</b> We determined that the use of propofol has increased compared with that of benzodiazepines as the primary sedative used during NMB for ARDS. Compared with benzodiazepine and opioid use, propofol and opioid use during NMB for ARDS was associated with increased ventilator-free days (adjusted odds ratio, 1.38 [95% confidence interval, 1.24-1.54]), greater odds for survival at 28 days (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15 [95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.31]), and greater odds for discharge home (adjusted odds ratio, 1.26 [95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.46]), adjusting for patient-level and hospital-level characteristics. <b>Conclusions:</b> From 2010 to 2021, sedation practice during NMB for ARDS shifted from predominately benzodiazepine use to predominately propofol use. The use of propofol and opioids is associated with an increase in ventilator-free days compared with the use of benzodiazepines and opioids. These results suggest that sedation choice during NMB for ARDS may affect clinical outcomes; further investigation is needed to validate these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1394-1400\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416150/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202411-1225OC\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202411-1225OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

原理:神经肌肉阻滞常用于急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)以改善呼吸机同步。在神经肌肉阻断期间,哪些镇静药物同时使用以及镇静选择是否影响患者预后尚不清楚。目的:确定急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)及高危患者神经肌肉阻断期间的全国镇静实践模式,并确定与苯二氮卓类药物和阿片类药物相比,丙泊酚和阿片类药物的使用是否与改善预后相关。方法:使用2010-2021年的美国国家数据库,纳入入院后至少两个住院日接受神经肌肉阻滞诊断为ARDS或ARDS危险因素的插管和机械通气患者。记录每位患者住院头两天的镇静和镇痛费用。通过多变量分析检验异丙酚和阿片类药物与苯二氮卓类药物和阿片类药物之间的关系,主要结局是无呼吸机天数,次要结局是28天生存和出院。结果:我们确定,与苯二氮卓类药物相比,异丙酚作为ARDS神经肌肉阻断期间使用的主要镇静剂有所增加。与苯二氮卓类药物和阿片类药物的使用相比,在ARDS神经肌肉阻断期间使用异丙酚和阿片类药物与无呼吸机天数增加相关(校正优势比1.38,95%置信区间1.24 - 1.54),28天生存率更高(校正优势比1.15,95%置信区间1.01- 1.31),以及根据患者水平和医院水平特征调整后出院回家的几率更高(校正优势比1.26,95%置信区间1.09 - 1.46)。结论:从2010-2021年,ARDS患者神经肌肉阻断期间的镇静实践已经从主要使用苯二氮卓类药物转变为主要使用异丙酚。与使用苯二氮卓类药物和阿片类药物相比,使用异丙酚和阿片类药物与不使用呼吸机的天数增加有关。这些结果表明,急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者NMB期间的镇静选择可能会影响临床结果;需要进一步的调查来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sedation Practices during Continuous Neuromuscular Blockade for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Rationale: Neuromuscular blockade (NMB) is frequently used during acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) to improve ventilator synchrony. Which sedating medications are used concomitantly during NMB and whether sedation choice influences patient outcomes are unclear. Objectives: To determine national sedation practice patterns during NMB in patients with and at risk for ARDS and to establish whether the use of propofol and opioids compared with benzodiazepines and opioids is associated with improved outcomes. Methods: Using a U.S. national database from 2010 to 2021, intubated and mechanically ventilated patients receiving NMB for a diagnosis of ARDS or an ARDS risk factor over at least two hospital days after admission were included. Charges for sedation and analgesia during the first two hospital days were recorded for each patient. The relationships between propofol and opioids and between benzodiazepines and opioids, with a primary outcome of ventilator-free days, as well as secondary outcomes of 28-day survival and discharge home were examined in multivariable analyses. Results: We determined that the use of propofol has increased compared with that of benzodiazepines as the primary sedative used during NMB for ARDS. Compared with benzodiazepine and opioid use, propofol and opioid use during NMB for ARDS was associated with increased ventilator-free days (adjusted odds ratio, 1.38 [95% confidence interval, 1.24-1.54]), greater odds for survival at 28 days (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15 [95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.31]), and greater odds for discharge home (adjusted odds ratio, 1.26 [95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.46]), adjusting for patient-level and hospital-level characteristics. Conclusions: From 2010 to 2021, sedation practice during NMB for ARDS shifted from predominately benzodiazepine use to predominately propofol use. The use of propofol and opioids is associated with an increase in ventilator-free days compared with the use of benzodiazepines and opioids. These results suggest that sedation choice during NMB for ARDS may affect clinical outcomes; further investigation is needed to validate these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信