Mark Jesunathadas, Elizabeth Edwards, Tiffany Landry, Scott Piland, Trenton Gould, Thomas Plaisted
{"title":"头部姿势对美式橄榄球头盔钝冲击性能的影响。","authors":"Mark Jesunathadas, Elizabeth Edwards, Tiffany Landry, Scott Piland, Trenton Gould, Thomas Plaisted","doi":"10.1115/1.4068632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this research was to evaluate the influence of ATD head-neck system pose on the kinematic responses of an ATD donning football helmets during blunt impact tests. Specifically, for two American football helmets we aimed to determine if identical impact locations but with two different ATD head-neck poses resulted in differences in ATD headform kinematics. Eight Xenith Shadow and eight X2E+ American football helmets were fit to a medium NOCSAE ATD attached to a male 50th percentile Hybrid III neck. Each helmet was impacted at 6 m/s using a pneumatic linear ram 4 times at 4 sites on the helmet. One set (4) of the Shadow and (4) X2E+ helmets were impacted with the ATD head-neck in one type of pose, termed Flexion Pose. The other set (4 Shadow and 4 X2E+) were impacted with the ATD head-neck mount system rotated another type of pose, termed Lateral Bending Pose. Dependent measures included the difference (d) between the two poses (Flexion ? Lateral Bending) in peak linear acceleration (dPLA), peak angular acceleration (dPAA), and peak angular velocity (dPAV). A significant interaction between Helmet and Location was observed for dPLA (p < .001), dPAA (p < .001) and dPAV (p < .001). A main effect for helmet was also observed for dPLA (p < .001), dPAA (p =.025), and dPAV (p < .008). The effect of such results within the context of methodologies that rank helmets according to blunt impact performance is discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influence of Headform Pose on The Blunt Impact Performance of American Football Helmets.\",\"authors\":\"Mark Jesunathadas, Elizabeth Edwards, Tiffany Landry, Scott Piland, Trenton Gould, Thomas Plaisted\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4068632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this research was to evaluate the influence of ATD head-neck system pose on the kinematic responses of an ATD donning football helmets during blunt impact tests. Specifically, for two American football helmets we aimed to determine if identical impact locations but with two different ATD head-neck poses resulted in differences in ATD headform kinematics. Eight Xenith Shadow and eight X2E+ American football helmets were fit to a medium NOCSAE ATD attached to a male 50th percentile Hybrid III neck. Each helmet was impacted at 6 m/s using a pneumatic linear ram 4 times at 4 sites on the helmet. One set (4) of the Shadow and (4) X2E+ helmets were impacted with the ATD head-neck in one type of pose, termed Flexion Pose. The other set (4 Shadow and 4 X2E+) were impacted with the ATD head-neck mount system rotated another type of pose, termed Lateral Bending Pose. Dependent measures included the difference (d) between the two poses (Flexion ? Lateral Bending) in peak linear acceleration (dPLA), peak angular acceleration (dPAA), and peak angular velocity (dPAV). A significant interaction between Helmet and Location was observed for dPLA (p < .001), dPAA (p < .001) and dPAV (p < .001). A main effect for helmet was also observed for dPLA (p < .001), dPAA (p =.025), and dPAV (p < .008). The effect of such results within the context of methodologies that rank helmets according to blunt impact performance is discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4068632\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4068632","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Influence of Headform Pose on The Blunt Impact Performance of American Football Helmets.
The purpose of this research was to evaluate the influence of ATD head-neck system pose on the kinematic responses of an ATD donning football helmets during blunt impact tests. Specifically, for two American football helmets we aimed to determine if identical impact locations but with two different ATD head-neck poses resulted in differences in ATD headform kinematics. Eight Xenith Shadow and eight X2E+ American football helmets were fit to a medium NOCSAE ATD attached to a male 50th percentile Hybrid III neck. Each helmet was impacted at 6 m/s using a pneumatic linear ram 4 times at 4 sites on the helmet. One set (4) of the Shadow and (4) X2E+ helmets were impacted with the ATD head-neck in one type of pose, termed Flexion Pose. The other set (4 Shadow and 4 X2E+) were impacted with the ATD head-neck mount system rotated another type of pose, termed Lateral Bending Pose. Dependent measures included the difference (d) between the two poses (Flexion ? Lateral Bending) in peak linear acceleration (dPLA), peak angular acceleration (dPAA), and peak angular velocity (dPAV). A significant interaction between Helmet and Location was observed for dPLA (p < .001), dPAA (p < .001) and dPAV (p < .001). A main effect for helmet was also observed for dPLA (p < .001), dPAA (p =.025), and dPAV (p < .008). The effect of such results within the context of methodologies that rank helmets according to blunt impact performance is discussed.
期刊介绍:
Artificial Organs and Prostheses; Bioinstrumentation and Measurements; Bioheat Transfer; Biomaterials; Biomechanics; Bioprocess Engineering; Cellular Mechanics; Design and Control of Biological Systems; Physiological Systems.