Olga Sánchez-Ramírez , Jaime Almazán-Polo , Ángel González-de-la-Flor
{"title":"超声和横波弹性成像评估下肢神经僵硬和偏移的可靠性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Olga Sánchez-Ramírez , Jaime Almazán-Polo , Ángel González-de-la-Flor","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and methodological quality of ultrasonography and ultrasound elastography in assessing neural excursion and stiffness through shear wave elastography (SWE) of lower extremity nerves. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review was conducted across MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus databases, covering publications from 2014 to 2024. Out of 270 studies initially identified, 26 met the eligibility criteria, involving a total of 778 participants and 1,448 nerves. Reliability metrics included intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC). Meta-analyses were performed for the sciatic and tibial nerves, incorporating data from studies employing SWE and B-mode ultrasonography. The pooled ICC for SWE in the sciatic nerve was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93–0.98, I² = 25.6%), indicating excellent reliability. For the tibial nerve, ICCs varied by position, with an overall ICC of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.75–0.99, I² = 84.2%) for supine and prone positions and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94–0.98, I² = 1.5%) for longitudinal excursion in weight-bearing and side-lying positions. Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences between the two groups. This systematic review and meta-analysis support the reliability of SWE in assessing sciatic and tibial nerve stiffness, along with tibial nerve excursion in specific positions. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution, as evidence for the saphenous and femoral nerves remains limited.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":"51 7","pages":"Pages 1043-1058"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of Ultrasound and Shear Wave Elastography in Assessing Lower Extremity Nerve Stiffness and Excursion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Olga Sánchez-Ramírez , Jaime Almazán-Polo , Ángel González-de-la-Flor\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.03.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and methodological quality of ultrasonography and ultrasound elastography in assessing neural excursion and stiffness through shear wave elastography (SWE) of lower extremity nerves. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review was conducted across MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus databases, covering publications from 2014 to 2024. Out of 270 studies initially identified, 26 met the eligibility criteria, involving a total of 778 participants and 1,448 nerves. Reliability metrics included intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC). Meta-analyses were performed for the sciatic and tibial nerves, incorporating data from studies employing SWE and B-mode ultrasonography. The pooled ICC for SWE in the sciatic nerve was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93–0.98, I² = 25.6%), indicating excellent reliability. For the tibial nerve, ICCs varied by position, with an overall ICC of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.75–0.99, I² = 84.2%) for supine and prone positions and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94–0.98, I² = 1.5%) for longitudinal excursion in weight-bearing and side-lying positions. Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences between the two groups. This systematic review and meta-analysis support the reliability of SWE in assessing sciatic and tibial nerve stiffness, along with tibial nerve excursion in specific positions. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution, as evidence for the saphenous and femoral nerves remains limited.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":\"51 7\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1043-1058\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562925000857\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562925000857","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reliability of Ultrasound and Shear Wave Elastography in Assessing Lower Extremity Nerve Stiffness and Excursion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and methodological quality of ultrasonography and ultrasound elastography in assessing neural excursion and stiffness through shear wave elastography (SWE) of lower extremity nerves. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review was conducted across MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus databases, covering publications from 2014 to 2024. Out of 270 studies initially identified, 26 met the eligibility criteria, involving a total of 778 participants and 1,448 nerves. Reliability metrics included intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC). Meta-analyses were performed for the sciatic and tibial nerves, incorporating data from studies employing SWE and B-mode ultrasonography. The pooled ICC for SWE in the sciatic nerve was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93–0.98, I² = 25.6%), indicating excellent reliability. For the tibial nerve, ICCs varied by position, with an overall ICC of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.75–0.99, I² = 84.2%) for supine and prone positions and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94–0.98, I² = 1.5%) for longitudinal excursion in weight-bearing and side-lying positions. Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences between the two groups. This systematic review and meta-analysis support the reliability of SWE in assessing sciatic and tibial nerve stiffness, along with tibial nerve excursion in specific positions. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution, as evidence for the saphenous and femoral nerves remains limited.
期刊介绍:
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.