Hayling和Brixton测试检测中老年人痴呆、进行性认知衰退和轻度认知障碍的有效性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 5.4 2区 心理学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
M O Palombo, A M Foran
{"title":"Hayling和Brixton测试检测中老年人痴呆、进行性认知衰退和轻度认知障碍的有效性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"M O Palombo, A M Foran","doi":"10.1007/s11065-025-09658-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aging population is increasing the prevalence of dementia, neurodegenerative disorders, and mild cognitive impairment, which are associated with cognitive declines in executive functioning. In people with these disorders, accurate tests can aid in the early detection of executive functioning decline and facilitate access to interventions. The Hayling and Brixton tests (HBTs) are popular executive functioning tests that assess inhibitory control. The HBTs may be especially effective for detecting people with disorders that are associated with disinhibition, such as behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). However, the effectiveness of the HBTs for detecting cognitive decline in dementia, neurodegenerative disorders, and mild cognitive impairment has yet to be collated. A comprehensive search of five databases identified 50 studies that compared the HBTs performances of adults aged 40 years and over with a dementia, neurodegenerative disorder, or mild cognitive impairment (e.g., Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's dementia, bvFTD) and cognitively-healthy controls. Hedges' g effect sizes compared groups on the five HBTs scores (Inhibition Errors, Inhibition Reaction Time (RT), Automatic RT, Inhibition minus Automatic RT, and Brixton Errors). The disorders (combined) showed negative effects on all HBTs scores (g - 0.37 to - 1.13), with dementia (combined) performing the worst (g - 0.54 to - 1.56). Automatic RT and Inhibition Errors were the most effective scores for detecting cognitive decline in dementia (g - 1.55; g - 1.34). The dementia types performed similar after outliers were removed and only studies with low risk-of-bias were analyzed. Overall, the HBTs are effective for detecting cognitive decline in middle to older aged adults, especially those with dementia. However, no score type can be recommended for differentiating the dementia types, such as AD and bvFTD.</p>","PeriodicalId":49754,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of the Hayling and Brixton Tests for Detecting Dementia, Progressive Cognitive Decline, and Mild Cognitive Impairment in Middle to Older Aged Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"M O Palombo, A M Foran\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11065-025-09658-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aging population is increasing the prevalence of dementia, neurodegenerative disorders, and mild cognitive impairment, which are associated with cognitive declines in executive functioning. In people with these disorders, accurate tests can aid in the early detection of executive functioning decline and facilitate access to interventions. The Hayling and Brixton tests (HBTs) are popular executive functioning tests that assess inhibitory control. The HBTs may be especially effective for detecting people with disorders that are associated with disinhibition, such as behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). However, the effectiveness of the HBTs for detecting cognitive decline in dementia, neurodegenerative disorders, and mild cognitive impairment has yet to be collated. A comprehensive search of five databases identified 50 studies that compared the HBTs performances of adults aged 40 years and over with a dementia, neurodegenerative disorder, or mild cognitive impairment (e.g., Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's dementia, bvFTD) and cognitively-healthy controls. Hedges' g effect sizes compared groups on the five HBTs scores (Inhibition Errors, Inhibition Reaction Time (RT), Automatic RT, Inhibition minus Automatic RT, and Brixton Errors). The disorders (combined) showed negative effects on all HBTs scores (g - 0.37 to - 1.13), with dementia (combined) performing the worst (g - 0.54 to - 1.56). Automatic RT and Inhibition Errors were the most effective scores for detecting cognitive decline in dementia (g - 1.55; g - 1.34). The dementia types performed similar after outliers were removed and only studies with low risk-of-bias were analyzed. Overall, the HBTs are effective for detecting cognitive decline in middle to older aged adults, especially those with dementia. However, no score type can be recommended for differentiating the dementia types, such as AD and bvFTD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychology Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-025-09658-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-025-09658-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人口老龄化增加了痴呆症、神经退行性疾病和轻度认知障碍的患病率,这些疾病与执行功能的认知能力下降有关。对于患有这些疾病的人,准确的测试有助于早期发现执行功能衰退,并有助于获得干预措施。海林和布里克斯顿测试(hbt)是流行的执行功能测试,评估抑制控制。HBTs可能对检测与去抑制相关的疾病患者特别有效,例如行为变异性额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)。然而,HBTs在检测痴呆、神经退行性疾病和轻度认知障碍的认知能力下降方面的有效性尚未得到整理。对5个数据库的全面搜索确定了50项研究,这些研究比较了40岁及以上患有痴呆症、神经退行性疾病或轻度认知障碍(如帕金森病、阿尔茨海默氏痴呆症、bvFTD)的成年人和认知健康对照组的HBTs表现。在5个HBTs得分(抑制错误、抑制反应时间(RT)、自动RT、抑制减去自动RT和布里克斯顿错误)上,比较了Hedges的效应量。这些疾病(综合)对所有HBTs评分都有负面影响(g - 0.37至- 1.13),其中痴呆(综合)表现最差(g - 0.54至- 1.56)。自动RT和抑制错误是检测痴呆患者认知能力下降的最有效评分(g - 1.55;g - 1.34)。在剔除异常值后,痴呆类型表现相似,仅分析低偏倚风险的研究。总体而言,HBTs对检测中老年人的认知能力下降是有效的,尤其是那些患有痴呆症的人。然而,没有推荐的评分类型来区分痴呆类型,如AD和bvFTD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of the Hayling and Brixton Tests for Detecting Dementia, Progressive Cognitive Decline, and Mild Cognitive Impairment in Middle to Older Aged Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The aging population is increasing the prevalence of dementia, neurodegenerative disorders, and mild cognitive impairment, which are associated with cognitive declines in executive functioning. In people with these disorders, accurate tests can aid in the early detection of executive functioning decline and facilitate access to interventions. The Hayling and Brixton tests (HBTs) are popular executive functioning tests that assess inhibitory control. The HBTs may be especially effective for detecting people with disorders that are associated with disinhibition, such as behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). However, the effectiveness of the HBTs for detecting cognitive decline in dementia, neurodegenerative disorders, and mild cognitive impairment has yet to be collated. A comprehensive search of five databases identified 50 studies that compared the HBTs performances of adults aged 40 years and over with a dementia, neurodegenerative disorder, or mild cognitive impairment (e.g., Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's dementia, bvFTD) and cognitively-healthy controls. Hedges' g effect sizes compared groups on the five HBTs scores (Inhibition Errors, Inhibition Reaction Time (RT), Automatic RT, Inhibition minus Automatic RT, and Brixton Errors). The disorders (combined) showed negative effects on all HBTs scores (g - 0.37 to - 1.13), with dementia (combined) performing the worst (g - 0.54 to - 1.56). Automatic RT and Inhibition Errors were the most effective scores for detecting cognitive decline in dementia (g - 1.55; g - 1.34). The dementia types performed similar after outliers were removed and only studies with low risk-of-bias were analyzed. Overall, the HBTs are effective for detecting cognitive decline in middle to older aged adults, especially those with dementia. However, no score type can be recommended for differentiating the dementia types, such as AD and bvFTD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychology Review
Neuropsychology Review 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
1.70%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Neuropsychology Review is a quarterly, refereed publication devoted to integrative review papers on substantive content areas in neuropsychology, with particular focus on populations with endogenous or acquired conditions affecting brain and function and on translational research providing a mechanistic understanding of clinical problems. Publication of new data is not the purview of the journal. Articles are written by international specialists in the field, discussing such complex issues as distinctive functional features of central nervous system disease and injury; challenges in early diagnosis; the impact of genes and environment on function; risk factors for functional impairment; treatment efficacy of neuropsychological rehabilitation; the role of neuroimaging, neuroelectrophysiology, and other neurometric modalities in explicating function; clinical trial design; neuropsychological function and its substrates characteristic of normal development and aging; and neuropsychological dysfunction and its substrates in neurological, psychiatric, and medical conditions. The journal''s broad perspective is supported by an outstanding, multidisciplinary editorial review board guided by the aim to provide students and professionals, clinicians and researchers with scholarly articles that critically and objectively summarize and synthesize the strengths and weaknesses in the literature and propose novel hypotheses, methods of analysis, and links to other fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信