棒球运动员肩部力量的归一化方法。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Sean M Kennedy, Natalie L Myers, John E Conway, J Craig Garrison, Thomas Guffey, Lane B Bailey, Amanda J Arnold
{"title":"棒球运动员肩部力量的归一化方法。","authors":"Sean M Kennedy, Natalie L Myers, John E Conway, J Craig Garrison, Thomas Guffey, Lane B Bailey, Amanda J Arnold","doi":"10.1177/19417381251329929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arm injuries in baseball continue to rise. Previous studies have confirmed relationships between shoulder strength, injury risk, and performance in baseball athletes. Shoulder strength measures vary considerably within and among baseball players and are influenced heavily by anthropometric measures. Presently, the normalization of shoulder strength measures has not been tested adequately to meet necessary statistical assumptions.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>At least 1 shoulder strength normalization method would meet 2 statistical assumptions: the intercept assumption and correlation assumption.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Isometric shoulder strength was tested in a cohort of uninjured baseball athletes on the dominant limb via handheld dynamometry: external rotation (ER), internal rotation (IR), and scapular plane abduction (SCAP). Five normalization methods were assessed using 2 statistical assumptions to determine the most appropriate normalization method for each shoulder strength measure: first, the regression line between a participant characteristic (body mass, height, ulnar length, and their respective combinations) and the unnormalized strength measure passes through the origin; second, normalizing shoulder strength eliminates its correlation with the participant characteristics. Statistical significance was set a priori at <i>α</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Body mass normalization was the only normalization method that satisfied the intercept and correlation assumptions for ER, IR, and SCAP strength (<i>P</i> > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Normalizing shoulder ER, IR, and SCAP strength in uninjured baseball athletes using body mass satisfied both statistical assumptions. When clinicians seek to compare shoulder strength in baseball athletes of differing anthropometric make-up, using body mass as the denominator is the most appropriate method for normalization.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The utilization of a statistically supported shoulder strength normalization method is warranted to account for anthropometric differences when comparing strength between athletes. This study adds a clinically relevant and reproducible method for normalizing isometric shoulder strength in uninjured baseball players.</p>","PeriodicalId":54276,"journal":{"name":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","volume":" ","pages":"19417381251329929"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11999986/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Normalization Methods for Shoulder Strength in Baseball Athletes.\",\"authors\":\"Sean M Kennedy, Natalie L Myers, John E Conway, J Craig Garrison, Thomas Guffey, Lane B Bailey, Amanda J Arnold\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19417381251329929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arm injuries in baseball continue to rise. Previous studies have confirmed relationships between shoulder strength, injury risk, and performance in baseball athletes. Shoulder strength measures vary considerably within and among baseball players and are influenced heavily by anthropometric measures. Presently, the normalization of shoulder strength measures has not been tested adequately to meet necessary statistical assumptions.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>At least 1 shoulder strength normalization method would meet 2 statistical assumptions: the intercept assumption and correlation assumption.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Isometric shoulder strength was tested in a cohort of uninjured baseball athletes on the dominant limb via handheld dynamometry: external rotation (ER), internal rotation (IR), and scapular plane abduction (SCAP). Five normalization methods were assessed using 2 statistical assumptions to determine the most appropriate normalization method for each shoulder strength measure: first, the regression line between a participant characteristic (body mass, height, ulnar length, and their respective combinations) and the unnormalized strength measure passes through the origin; second, normalizing shoulder strength eliminates its correlation with the participant characteristics. Statistical significance was set a priori at <i>α</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Body mass normalization was the only normalization method that satisfied the intercept and correlation assumptions for ER, IR, and SCAP strength (<i>P</i> > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Normalizing shoulder ER, IR, and SCAP strength in uninjured baseball athletes using body mass satisfied both statistical assumptions. When clinicians seek to compare shoulder strength in baseball athletes of differing anthropometric make-up, using body mass as the denominator is the most appropriate method for normalization.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The utilization of a statistically supported shoulder strength normalization method is warranted to account for anthropometric differences when comparing strength between athletes. This study adds a clinically relevant and reproducible method for normalizing isometric shoulder strength in uninjured baseball players.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19417381251329929\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11999986/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381251329929\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381251329929","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:棒球运动中手臂受伤的情况持续上升。先前的研究已经证实了棒球运动员肩部力量、受伤风险和表现之间的关系。肩力测量在棒球运动员内部和之间差异很大,并且受到人体测量的严重影响。目前,肩强度测量的归一化还没有得到充分的检验,以满足必要的统计假设。假设:至少有一种肩强度归一化方法满足2个统计假设:截距假设和相关性假设。研究设计:横断面研究。证据等级:三级。方法:对一组未受伤的棒球运动员的优势肢进行等距肩力测试,采用手持式测力法:外旋(ER)、内旋(IR)和肩胛骨平面外展(SCAP)。采用2个统计假设对5种归一化方法进行评估,以确定每种肩部力量测量最合适的归一化方法:首先,参与者特征(体重、身高、尺骨长度及其各自的组合)与未归一化的力量测量之间的回归线通过原点;其次,肩部力量正常化消除了其与参与者特征的相关性。差异有统计学意义,α < 0.05。结果:体重归一化是唯一满足ER、IR和SCAP强度的截距和相关性假设的归一化方法(P < 0.05)。结论:未受伤棒球运动员的肩部ER、IR和SCAP强度的体重正常化符合这两个统计假设。当临床医生试图比较不同人体测量构成的棒球运动员的肩膀力量时,使用体重作为分母是最合适的归一化方法。临床相关性:在比较运动员之间的力量时,使用统计学支持的肩部力量归一化方法来解释人体测量差异是有必要的。本研究增加了一种临床相关和可重复的方法来规范未受伤棒球运动员的等距肩部力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Normalization Methods for Shoulder Strength in Baseball Athletes.

Background: Arm injuries in baseball continue to rise. Previous studies have confirmed relationships between shoulder strength, injury risk, and performance in baseball athletes. Shoulder strength measures vary considerably within and among baseball players and are influenced heavily by anthropometric measures. Presently, the normalization of shoulder strength measures has not been tested adequately to meet necessary statistical assumptions.

Hypothesis: At least 1 shoulder strength normalization method would meet 2 statistical assumptions: the intercept assumption and correlation assumption.

Study design: Cross-sectional study.

Level of evidence: Level 3.

Methods: Isometric shoulder strength was tested in a cohort of uninjured baseball athletes on the dominant limb via handheld dynamometry: external rotation (ER), internal rotation (IR), and scapular plane abduction (SCAP). Five normalization methods were assessed using 2 statistical assumptions to determine the most appropriate normalization method for each shoulder strength measure: first, the regression line between a participant characteristic (body mass, height, ulnar length, and their respective combinations) and the unnormalized strength measure passes through the origin; second, normalizing shoulder strength eliminates its correlation with the participant characteristics. Statistical significance was set a priori at α < 0.05.

Results: Body mass normalization was the only normalization method that satisfied the intercept and correlation assumptions for ER, IR, and SCAP strength (P > .05).

Conclusion: Normalizing shoulder ER, IR, and SCAP strength in uninjured baseball athletes using body mass satisfied both statistical assumptions. When clinicians seek to compare shoulder strength in baseball athletes of differing anthropometric make-up, using body mass as the denominator is the most appropriate method for normalization.

Clinical relevance: The utilization of a statistically supported shoulder strength normalization method is warranted to account for anthropometric differences when comparing strength between athletes. This study adds a clinically relevant and reproducible method for normalizing isometric shoulder strength in uninjured baseball players.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach is an indispensable resource for all medical professionals involved in the training and care of the competitive or recreational athlete, including primary care physicians, orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, athletic trainers and other medical and health care professionals. Published bimonthly, Sports Health is a collaborative publication from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM), the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA), and the Sports Physical Therapy Section (SPTS). The journal publishes review articles, original research articles, case studies, images, short updates, legal briefs, editorials, and letters to the editor. Topics include: -Sports Injury and Treatment -Care of the Athlete -Athlete Rehabilitation -Medical Issues in the Athlete -Surgical Techniques in Sports Medicine -Case Studies in Sports Medicine -Images in Sports Medicine -Legal Issues -Pediatric Athletes -General Sports Trauma -Sports Psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信