Ali Mortezaei, Mohamed Emara, Mohammad Amin Habibi, Forough Yazdanian, Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh, Adam A Dmytriw, Redi Rahmani, David S Liebeskind
{"title":"依达拉奉dexborneol治疗急性缺血性卒中:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ali Mortezaei, Mohamed Emara, Mohammad Amin Habibi, Forough Yazdanian, Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh, Adam A Dmytriw, Redi Rahmani, David S Liebeskind","doi":"10.1177/19714009251340319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundEdaravone dexborneol has been developed as a novel neuroprotective agent and showed a promising result in treatment of stroke. The current meta-analysis aimed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of the edaravone dexborneol in the treatment of stroke.MethodWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature in four electronic databases. Binary outcomes were analyzed through the risks ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), while the continuous outcomes were analyzed through the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI. Also, we did a subgroup analysis to show more feasibility and safety dimensions.ResultsFive studies with a total of 2415 patients were included. There were 1119 patients in edaravone dexborneol group and 1216 patients in control group. The 90-mRS 0-1 (RR 1.17 [95% CI 1.09-1.25]; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and 90-day mRS 0-2 (RR 1.12 [95% CI 1.07-1.18]; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) were statistically significant higher in intervention group compared with control group. There was no significant difference between intervention group and control group concerning 90-day mRS 0-3 (RR 1.03 [95% CI 0.99-1.06]; <i>p</i> = 0.07), 90-day mortality rate (RR 0.71 [95% CI 0.45-1.11]; <i>p</i> = 0.13), serious adverse events (RR 0.91 [95% CI 0.72-1.16]; <i>p</i> = 0.45), and NIHSS score ≤1 at days 14 (RR 0.96; <i>p</i> = 0.69), 30 (RR 1.08; <i>p</i> = 0.18), and 90 (RR 1.06; <i>p</i> = 0.15). No heterogeneity in treatment effect was seen in the analysis, and any potential discrepancies were addressed by sensitivity analysis.ConclusionEdaravone dexborneol can be a favorable treatment option for patients with stroke. However, more randomized controlled trials are required to confirm our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47358,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19714009251340319"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12061916/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Edaravone dexborneol for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Mortezaei, Mohamed Emara, Mohammad Amin Habibi, Forough Yazdanian, Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh, Adam A Dmytriw, Redi Rahmani, David S Liebeskind\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19714009251340319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundEdaravone dexborneol has been developed as a novel neuroprotective agent and showed a promising result in treatment of stroke. The current meta-analysis aimed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of the edaravone dexborneol in the treatment of stroke.MethodWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature in four electronic databases. Binary outcomes were analyzed through the risks ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), while the continuous outcomes were analyzed through the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI. Also, we did a subgroup analysis to show more feasibility and safety dimensions.ResultsFive studies with a total of 2415 patients were included. There were 1119 patients in edaravone dexborneol group and 1216 patients in control group. The 90-mRS 0-1 (RR 1.17 [95% CI 1.09-1.25]; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and 90-day mRS 0-2 (RR 1.12 [95% CI 1.07-1.18]; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) were statistically significant higher in intervention group compared with control group. There was no significant difference between intervention group and control group concerning 90-day mRS 0-3 (RR 1.03 [95% CI 0.99-1.06]; <i>p</i> = 0.07), 90-day mortality rate (RR 0.71 [95% CI 0.45-1.11]; <i>p</i> = 0.13), serious adverse events (RR 0.91 [95% CI 0.72-1.16]; <i>p</i> = 0.45), and NIHSS score ≤1 at days 14 (RR 0.96; <i>p</i> = 0.69), 30 (RR 1.08; <i>p</i> = 0.18), and 90 (RR 1.06; <i>p</i> = 0.15). No heterogeneity in treatment effect was seen in the analysis, and any potential discrepancies were addressed by sensitivity analysis.ConclusionEdaravone dexborneol can be a favorable treatment option for patients with stroke. However, more randomized controlled trials are required to confirm our findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroradiology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19714009251340319\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12061916/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroradiology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009251340319\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009251340319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
地达拉奉dexborneol是一种新型的神经保护剂,在脑卒中的治疗中显示出良好的效果。当前的荟萃分析旨在评估依达拉奉左旋肾上腺皮质激素治疗脑卒中的可行性和有效性。方法对4个电子数据库的文献进行系统回顾和meta分析。二元结局通过风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)进行分析,连续结局通过标准化平均差(SMD)和95% CI进行分析。同时,我们做了一个亚组分析来展示更多的可行性和安全性。结果纳入5项研究,共2415例患者。依达拉奉右冰片组1119例,对照组1216例。90-mRS为0-1 (RR 1.17 [95% CI 1.09-1.25];p < 0.0001)和90天mRS 0-2 (RR 1.12 [95% CI 1.07-1.18];P < 0.0001),干预组与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义。干预组与对照组90天mRS 0-3无显著差异(RR 1.03 [95% CI 0.99-1.06];p = 0.07), 90天死亡率(RR 0.71 [95% CI 0.45-1.11];p = 0.13),严重不良事件(RR 0.91 [95% CI 0.72-1.16];p = 0.45),第14天NIHSS评分≤1 (RR 0.96;p = 0.69), 30 (RR 1.08;p = 0.18)和90 (RR 1.06;P = 0.15)。分析中未发现治疗效果的异质性,并通过敏感性分析解决了任何潜在的差异。结论依达拉奉dexborneol是脑卒中患者较好的治疗方案。然而,需要更多的随机对照试验来证实我们的发现。
Edaravone dexborneol for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BackgroundEdaravone dexborneol has been developed as a novel neuroprotective agent and showed a promising result in treatment of stroke. The current meta-analysis aimed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of the edaravone dexborneol in the treatment of stroke.MethodWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature in four electronic databases. Binary outcomes were analyzed through the risks ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), while the continuous outcomes were analyzed through the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI. Also, we did a subgroup analysis to show more feasibility and safety dimensions.ResultsFive studies with a total of 2415 patients were included. There were 1119 patients in edaravone dexborneol group and 1216 patients in control group. The 90-mRS 0-1 (RR 1.17 [95% CI 1.09-1.25]; p < 0.0001) and 90-day mRS 0-2 (RR 1.12 [95% CI 1.07-1.18]; p < 0.0001) were statistically significant higher in intervention group compared with control group. There was no significant difference between intervention group and control group concerning 90-day mRS 0-3 (RR 1.03 [95% CI 0.99-1.06]; p = 0.07), 90-day mortality rate (RR 0.71 [95% CI 0.45-1.11]; p = 0.13), serious adverse events (RR 0.91 [95% CI 0.72-1.16]; p = 0.45), and NIHSS score ≤1 at days 14 (RR 0.96; p = 0.69), 30 (RR 1.08; p = 0.18), and 90 (RR 1.06; p = 0.15). No heterogeneity in treatment effect was seen in the analysis, and any potential discrepancies were addressed by sensitivity analysis.ConclusionEdaravone dexborneol can be a favorable treatment option for patients with stroke. However, more randomized controlled trials are required to confirm our findings.
期刊介绍:
NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal (formerly Rivista di Neuroradiologia) is the official journal of the Italian Association of Neuroradiology and of the several Scientific Societies from all over the world. Founded in 1988 as Rivista di Neuroradiologia, of June 2006 evolved in NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal. It is published bimonthly.