克罗地亚全科医生对电离辐射的认识和认知:是否有值得关注的理由?

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Andro Matković, Thomas Ferenc, Lucija Dimjašević, Martin Drinković, Marko Marelić, Branka R Matković, Vinko Vidjak, Jelena Popić
{"title":"克罗地亚全科医生对电离辐射的认识和认知:是否有值得关注的理由?","authors":"Andro Matković, Thomas Ferenc, Lucija Dimjašević, Martin Drinković, Marko Marelić, Branka R Matković, Vinko Vidjak, Jelena Popić","doi":"10.2478/aiht-2025-76-3916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent data suggest that general practitioners (GPs) are insufficiently familiar with health risks associated with ionising radiation and radiation doses. The aim of our cross-sectional study was therefore to see if this holds true for Croatian GPs. To do that, we distributed a questionnaire about ionising radiation and doses used in various radiological procedures by email or by handing it out to participants at a national GP conference. We received responses from 120 participating GPs. Most were women (83.1 %), and the mean participant age was 44.2 years (range 26-65) with mean practice of 17.1 years (range 1-40). Most participants (97 %) believed patients should be informed about the procedures they were referred to. All respondents knew that radiological procedures irradiate the patient's body, but not everyone agreed that they could be harmful. Less than half (47 %) thought that exposure to a single irradiation dose was enough to increase cancer risk. Most participants (89.2 %) identified X-ray scans as the largest irradiation source, whereas three GPs replied that computed tomography (CT) and conventional X-ray procedures did not involve radiation. Some respondents did not know if ultrasound involved ionising radiation. Although most GPs were women, only 21.7 % correctly identified the radiation dose in mammography. Our findings confirm inadequate GPs' knowledge of radiation exposures and call for better training programmes as part of continuing professional development.</p>","PeriodicalId":55462,"journal":{"name":"Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology","volume":"76 1","pages":"24-30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11994234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge and perceptions of ionising radiation among Croatian general practitioners: is there cause for concern?\",\"authors\":\"Andro Matković, Thomas Ferenc, Lucija Dimjašević, Martin Drinković, Marko Marelić, Branka R Matković, Vinko Vidjak, Jelena Popić\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/aiht-2025-76-3916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recent data suggest that general practitioners (GPs) are insufficiently familiar with health risks associated with ionising radiation and radiation doses. The aim of our cross-sectional study was therefore to see if this holds true for Croatian GPs. To do that, we distributed a questionnaire about ionising radiation and doses used in various radiological procedures by email or by handing it out to participants at a national GP conference. We received responses from 120 participating GPs. Most were women (83.1 %), and the mean participant age was 44.2 years (range 26-65) with mean practice of 17.1 years (range 1-40). Most participants (97 %) believed patients should be informed about the procedures they were referred to. All respondents knew that radiological procedures irradiate the patient's body, but not everyone agreed that they could be harmful. Less than half (47 %) thought that exposure to a single irradiation dose was enough to increase cancer risk. Most participants (89.2 %) identified X-ray scans as the largest irradiation source, whereas three GPs replied that computed tomography (CT) and conventional X-ray procedures did not involve radiation. Some respondents did not know if ultrasound involved ionising radiation. Although most GPs were women, only 21.7 % correctly identified the radiation dose in mammography. Our findings confirm inadequate GPs' knowledge of radiation exposures and call for better training programmes as part of continuing professional development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"24-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11994234/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/aiht-2025-76-3916\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/aiht-2025-76-3916","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的数据表明,全科医生对与电离辐射和辐射剂量相关的健康风险不够熟悉。因此,我们横断面研究的目的是看看这是否适用于克罗地亚全科医生。为了做到这一点,我们通过电子邮件或在全国全科医生会议上向与会者分发了一份关于电离辐射和各种放射治疗过程中使用剂量的问卷。我们收到了120名参与调查的全科医生的回复。大多数是女性(83.1%),平均参与者年龄为44.2岁(26-65岁),平均执业年龄为17.1岁(1-40岁)。大多数参与者(97%)认为患者应该被告知他们所转诊的手术。所有的受访者都知道放射治疗会照射病人的身体,但并不是每个人都同意放射治疗可能有害。不到一半(47%)的人认为单次辐照剂量足以增加癌症风险。大多数参与者(89.2%)认为x射线扫描是最大的辐射源,而三名全科医生回答说,计算机断层扫描(CT)和传统的x射线程序不涉及辐射。一些受访者不知道超声波是否涉及电离辐射。虽然大多数全科医生是女性,但只有21.7%的人在乳房x光检查中正确识别出辐射剂量。我们的研究结果证实了全科医生对辐射暴露的认识不足,并呼吁将更好的培训计划作为持续专业发展的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowledge and perceptions of ionising radiation among Croatian general practitioners: is there cause for concern?

Recent data suggest that general practitioners (GPs) are insufficiently familiar with health risks associated with ionising radiation and radiation doses. The aim of our cross-sectional study was therefore to see if this holds true for Croatian GPs. To do that, we distributed a questionnaire about ionising radiation and doses used in various radiological procedures by email or by handing it out to participants at a national GP conference. We received responses from 120 participating GPs. Most were women (83.1 %), and the mean participant age was 44.2 years (range 26-65) with mean practice of 17.1 years (range 1-40). Most participants (97 %) believed patients should be informed about the procedures they were referred to. All respondents knew that radiological procedures irradiate the patient's body, but not everyone agreed that they could be harmful. Less than half (47 %) thought that exposure to a single irradiation dose was enough to increase cancer risk. Most participants (89.2 %) identified X-ray scans as the largest irradiation source, whereas three GPs replied that computed tomography (CT) and conventional X-ray procedures did not involve radiation. Some respondents did not know if ultrasound involved ionising radiation. Although most GPs were women, only 21.7 % correctly identified the radiation dose in mammography. Our findings confirm inadequate GPs' knowledge of radiation exposures and call for better training programmes as part of continuing professional development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology
Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology (abbr. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol) is a peer-reviewed biomedical scientific quarterly that publishes contributions relevant to all aspects of environmental and occupational health and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信