闻所未闻的斗争:从父母和照顾者的角度探讨听力损失儿童与健康相关的生活质量决定因素和应对机制。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-04-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S515485
Ayoob Lone
{"title":"闻所未闻的斗争:从父母和照顾者的角度探讨听力损失儿童与健康相关的生活质量决定因素和应对机制。","authors":"Ayoob Lone","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S515485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Childhood hearing loss is an emerging public health concern. This study aimed to compare the quality of life (QOL) and coping strategies between children with and without hearing loss. It also explored the impact of coping strategies on the QOL of children with hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 95 children with hearing loss and 107 healthy controls aged 6-18 years, recruited from special education schools. QOL was evaluated using the SF-12 health survey, and coping strategies were assessed with the Brief COPE inventory. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive and inferential statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children with hearing loss reported lower QOL scores in areas such as role functioning, emotional well-being, mental health, and physical health. They were more likely to use maladaptive coping strategies like denial, behavioral disengagement, and self-blame, whereas healthy children favored adaptive strategies like self-distraction, emotional support, and positive reframing. Problem-focused coping showed a positive association with role functioning (r = 0.46, <i>p</i> < 0.01), emotional roles (r = 0.18, <i>p</i> < 0.05), and mental health (r = 0.19, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Sociodemographic factors, including grade level and rural residence, significantly influenced QOL, with children in rural areas (OR = 4.66; <i>p</i> = 0.03) and lower grades (OR = 8.89; <i>p</i> = 0.05) facing greater challenges. Multiple regression analysis revealed a significant relationship between the self-distraction and physical component summary score (<i>p</i> = 0.01). Self-distraction (<i>p</i> = 0.01) and the acceptance coping strategy (<i>p</i> = 0.02) had a notable effect on the mental summary score of SF-12 scores of children with hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study concluded that children with hearing impairment showed poor quality of life and these children use maladaptive coping strategies to combat with the stress caused by hearing loss. Early detection, community awareness, and customized support programs are crucial to enhancing the QOL of children with hearing loss and minimizing the condition's long-term impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"1241-1255"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11993120/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unheard Struggles: Exploring Health-Related Quality of Life Determinants and Coping Mechanisms Among Children with Hearing Loss from Parents and Caregivers Perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Ayoob Lone\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S515485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Childhood hearing loss is an emerging public health concern. This study aimed to compare the quality of life (QOL) and coping strategies between children with and without hearing loss. It also explored the impact of coping strategies on the QOL of children with hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 95 children with hearing loss and 107 healthy controls aged 6-18 years, recruited from special education schools. QOL was evaluated using the SF-12 health survey, and coping strategies were assessed with the Brief COPE inventory. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive and inferential statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children with hearing loss reported lower QOL scores in areas such as role functioning, emotional well-being, mental health, and physical health. They were more likely to use maladaptive coping strategies like denial, behavioral disengagement, and self-blame, whereas healthy children favored adaptive strategies like self-distraction, emotional support, and positive reframing. Problem-focused coping showed a positive association with role functioning (r = 0.46, <i>p</i> < 0.01), emotional roles (r = 0.18, <i>p</i> < 0.05), and mental health (r = 0.19, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Sociodemographic factors, including grade level and rural residence, significantly influenced QOL, with children in rural areas (OR = 4.66; <i>p</i> = 0.03) and lower grades (OR = 8.89; <i>p</i> = 0.05) facing greater challenges. Multiple regression analysis revealed a significant relationship between the self-distraction and physical component summary score (<i>p</i> = 0.01). Self-distraction (<i>p</i> = 0.01) and the acceptance coping strategy (<i>p</i> = 0.02) had a notable effect on the mental summary score of SF-12 scores of children with hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study concluded that children with hearing impairment showed poor quality of life and these children use maladaptive coping strategies to combat with the stress caused by hearing loss. Early detection, community awareness, and customized support programs are crucial to enhancing the QOL of children with hearing loss and minimizing the condition's long-term impact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"1241-1255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11993120/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S515485\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S515485","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:儿童听力损失是一个新兴的公共卫生问题。本研究旨在比较听力损失儿童和非听力损失儿童的生活质量和应对策略。探讨了应对策略对听力损失儿童生活质量的影响。方法:选取特殊教育学校6 ~ 18岁的听力损失儿童95例和健康对照107例。使用SF-12健康调查评估生活质量,使用Brief COPE量表评估应对策略。数据分析采用描述性统计和推理统计。结果:听力损失儿童在角色功能、情绪健康、心理健康和身体健康等方面的生活质量得分较低。他们更有可能使用不适应的应对策略,如否认、行为脱离和自责,而健康的孩子更喜欢自我分散注意力、情感支持和积极重构等适应策略。问题关注型应对与角色功能(r = 0.46, p < 0.01)、情绪角色(r = 0.18, p < 0.05)、心理健康(r = 0.19, p < 0.05)呈正相关。社会人口因素,包括年级水平和农村居住地,显著影响农村儿童的生活质量(OR = 4.66;p = 0.03)和较低等级(OR = 8.89;P = 0.05)面临更大的挑战。多元回归分析显示,自我分心与身体成分综合得分有显著相关(p = 0.01)。自我分心(p = 0.01)和接纳应对策略(p = 0.02)对听力损失儿童SF-12心理总结得分有显著影响。结论:本研究认为,听力障碍儿童的生活质量较差,这些儿童使用不适应的应对策略来对抗听力损失带来的压力。早期发现、社区意识和定制支持计划对于提高听力损失儿童的生活质量和最大限度地减少疾病的长期影响至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unheard Struggles: Exploring Health-Related Quality of Life Determinants and Coping Mechanisms Among Children with Hearing Loss from Parents and Caregivers Perspective.

Purpose: Childhood hearing loss is an emerging public health concern. This study aimed to compare the quality of life (QOL) and coping strategies between children with and without hearing loss. It also explored the impact of coping strategies on the QOL of children with hearing loss.

Methods: The study included 95 children with hearing loss and 107 healthy controls aged 6-18 years, recruited from special education schools. QOL was evaluated using the SF-12 health survey, and coping strategies were assessed with the Brief COPE inventory. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive and inferential statistics.

Results: Children with hearing loss reported lower QOL scores in areas such as role functioning, emotional well-being, mental health, and physical health. They were more likely to use maladaptive coping strategies like denial, behavioral disengagement, and self-blame, whereas healthy children favored adaptive strategies like self-distraction, emotional support, and positive reframing. Problem-focused coping showed a positive association with role functioning (r = 0.46, p < 0.01), emotional roles (r = 0.18, p < 0.05), and mental health (r = 0.19, p < 0.05). Sociodemographic factors, including grade level and rural residence, significantly influenced QOL, with children in rural areas (OR = 4.66; p = 0.03) and lower grades (OR = 8.89; p = 0.05) facing greater challenges. Multiple regression analysis revealed a significant relationship between the self-distraction and physical component summary score (p = 0.01). Self-distraction (p = 0.01) and the acceptance coping strategy (p = 0.02) had a notable effect on the mental summary score of SF-12 scores of children with hearing loss.

Conclusion: This study concluded that children with hearing impairment showed poor quality of life and these children use maladaptive coping strategies to combat with the stress caused by hearing loss. Early detection, community awareness, and customized support programs are crucial to enhancing the QOL of children with hearing loss and minimizing the condition's long-term impact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信