从匿名到参与:早期学期学生与教师会议的好处。

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Physiology Education Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-18 DOI:10.1152/advan.00040.2025
James T Davis, Abigail P Sondreal, Frederick Bauer, Joseph T Cornelius
{"title":"从匿名到参与:早期学期学生与教师会议的好处。","authors":"James T Davis, Abigail P Sondreal, Frederick Bauer, Joseph T Cornelius","doi":"10.1152/advan.00040.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Student-instructor relationships play a crucial role in academic engagement and success, yet large lecture courses often limit direct interaction. This study investigated whether a brief, early-semester meeting with the instructor could enhance student engagement and academic performance. Students (<i>n</i><sub>T</sub> = 423) in a large introductory physiology course were offered a five-minute, one-on-one meeting with the instructor, with a majority of students (<i>n</i><sub>M</sub> = 323) completing the meeting. Students (<i>n</i><sub>R</sub> = 336) completed a midsemester survey that assessed engagement behaviors and self-reported letter grades at midterm. Students who completed the survey and participated in the meeting (<i>n</i><sub>RM</sub> = 285) reported higher letter grades at midterm compared to those who did not (<i>P</i> = 0.02). These findings correlated with a moderate effect size (Cramér's V = 0.18). Similarly, an analysis of actual midterm grades between students who completed the meeting and those who did not revealed a moderate to strong effect size (Cramér's V = 0.33). While meeting participation did not significantly impact question-asking behavior during class, students reported feeling more comfortable seeking help in person, during class, and via email. Thematic analysis revealed two major themes: <i>Student Motivation and Intentions for Engaging with the Professor</i> and <i>Relationship-Building and Perceptions of the Professor</i>. Many students initially attended for extrinsic reasons (e.g., extra credit) but later expressed increased comfort with the instructor, reinforcing their willingness to engage in class. These findings suggest that structured, low-stakes interactions may improve student-instructor relationships, even in large lecture courses. Future research should explore the long-term impact of such meetings on student success and retention.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study shows that brief, early-semester student-instructor meetings foster stronger connections, increase student participation, and improve self-reported academic performance in large lecture courses. The following article demonstrates how a simple, scalable strategy can transform student-instructor relationships and enhance learning outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50852,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physiology Education","volume":" ","pages":"605-610"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From anonymity to engagement: the benefits of early-semester student-instructor meetings.\",\"authors\":\"James T Davis, Abigail P Sondreal, Frederick Bauer, Joseph T Cornelius\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/advan.00040.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Student-instructor relationships play a crucial role in academic engagement and success, yet large lecture courses often limit direct interaction. This study investigated whether a brief, early-semester meeting with the instructor could enhance student engagement and academic performance. Students (<i>n</i><sub>T</sub> = 423) in a large introductory physiology course were offered a five-minute, one-on-one meeting with the instructor, with a majority of students (<i>n</i><sub>M</sub> = 323) completing the meeting. Students (<i>n</i><sub>R</sub> = 336) completed a midsemester survey that assessed engagement behaviors and self-reported letter grades at midterm. Students who completed the survey and participated in the meeting (<i>n</i><sub>RM</sub> = 285) reported higher letter grades at midterm compared to those who did not (<i>P</i> = 0.02). These findings correlated with a moderate effect size (Cramér's V = 0.18). Similarly, an analysis of actual midterm grades between students who completed the meeting and those who did not revealed a moderate to strong effect size (Cramér's V = 0.33). While meeting participation did not significantly impact question-asking behavior during class, students reported feeling more comfortable seeking help in person, during class, and via email. Thematic analysis revealed two major themes: <i>Student Motivation and Intentions for Engaging with the Professor</i> and <i>Relationship-Building and Perceptions of the Professor</i>. Many students initially attended for extrinsic reasons (e.g., extra credit) but later expressed increased comfort with the instructor, reinforcing their willingness to engage in class. These findings suggest that structured, low-stakes interactions may improve student-instructor relationships, even in large lecture courses. Future research should explore the long-term impact of such meetings on student success and retention.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study shows that brief, early-semester student-instructor meetings foster stronger connections, increase student participation, and improve self-reported academic performance in large lecture courses. The following article demonstrates how a simple, scalable strategy can transform student-instructor relationships and enhance learning outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"605-610\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00040.2025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00040.2025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

师生关系在学术参与和学术成功中起着至关重要的作用,然而大型讲座课程往往限制了直接的互动。本研究调查了是否一个简短的,学期初的会议与教师可以提高学生的参与和学习成绩。在一门大型生理学入门课程中,学生(nT = 423)与讲师进行了5分钟的一对一会议,大多数学生(nM = 323)完成了会议。学生(nR= 336)在期中完成了一项调查,评估了参与行为和自我报告的信件成绩。完成调查并参加会议的学生(nRM = 285)在期中考试中的字母成绩高于没有完成调查和参加会议的学生(表2,p = 0.02)。这些发现与中等效应大小相关(cram’s V = 0.18)。同样,对完成会议的学生和没有完成会议的学生之间的实际期中成绩的分析显示了中等到强烈的效应量(cramsamr’s V = 0.33)。虽然参加会议对课堂上的提问行为没有显著影响,但学生们报告说,面对面、课堂上和通过电子邮件寻求帮助更舒服。主题分析揭示了两个主要主题:学生与教授互动的动机和意图,以及教授关系的建立和认知。许多学生最初是出于外在原因(例如,额外的学分)来上课的,但后来他们表示对老师越来越满意,从而加强了他们参与课堂的意愿。这些发现表明,即使在大型讲座课程中,结构化的、低风险的互动也可能改善学生与教师的关系。未来的研究应探讨此类会议对学生成功和留校的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From anonymity to engagement: the benefits of early-semester student-instructor meetings.

Student-instructor relationships play a crucial role in academic engagement and success, yet large lecture courses often limit direct interaction. This study investigated whether a brief, early-semester meeting with the instructor could enhance student engagement and academic performance. Students (nT = 423) in a large introductory physiology course were offered a five-minute, one-on-one meeting with the instructor, with a majority of students (nM = 323) completing the meeting. Students (nR = 336) completed a midsemester survey that assessed engagement behaviors and self-reported letter grades at midterm. Students who completed the survey and participated in the meeting (nRM = 285) reported higher letter grades at midterm compared to those who did not (P = 0.02). These findings correlated with a moderate effect size (Cramér's V = 0.18). Similarly, an analysis of actual midterm grades between students who completed the meeting and those who did not revealed a moderate to strong effect size (Cramér's V = 0.33). While meeting participation did not significantly impact question-asking behavior during class, students reported feeling more comfortable seeking help in person, during class, and via email. Thematic analysis revealed two major themes: Student Motivation and Intentions for Engaging with the Professor and Relationship-Building and Perceptions of the Professor. Many students initially attended for extrinsic reasons (e.g., extra credit) but later expressed increased comfort with the instructor, reinforcing their willingness to engage in class. These findings suggest that structured, low-stakes interactions may improve student-instructor relationships, even in large lecture courses. Future research should explore the long-term impact of such meetings on student success and retention.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study shows that brief, early-semester student-instructor meetings foster stronger connections, increase student participation, and improve self-reported academic performance in large lecture courses. The following article demonstrates how a simple, scalable strategy can transform student-instructor relationships and enhance learning outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
19.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Physiology Education promotes and disseminates educational scholarship in order to enhance teaching and learning of physiology, neuroscience and pathophysiology. The journal publishes peer-reviewed descriptions of innovations that improve teaching in the classroom and laboratory, essays on education, and review articles based on our current understanding of physiological mechanisms. Submissions that evaluate new technologies for teaching and research, and educational pedagogy, are especially welcome. The audience for the journal includes educators at all levels: K–12, undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信