Robin Arcani, Mélanie Velier, Florence Sabatier, Stéphanie Simoncini, Maxime Abellan-Lopez, Brigitte Granel, Audrey Benyamine, Quentin Gomes de Pinho, Vincent Dani, Pietro Gentile, Guy Magalon, Sophie Menkes, Steve Sampson, Alexis Verpaele, Lucienne Vonk, Jérémy Magalon, Aurélie Daumas
{"title":"纳米脂肪在再生医学中的应用:系统的文献综述和专家意见的一致建议。","authors":"Robin Arcani, Mélanie Velier, Florence Sabatier, Stéphanie Simoncini, Maxime Abellan-Lopez, Brigitte Granel, Audrey Benyamine, Quentin Gomes de Pinho, Vincent Dani, Pietro Gentile, Guy Magalon, Sophie Menkes, Steve Sampson, Alexis Verpaele, Lucienne Vonk, Jérémy Magalon, Aurélie Daumas","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To report <i>in vitro</i>, preclinical, and clinical effectiveness of nanofat in adults undergoing reconstructive or functional surgery and to produce a series of consensus statements about nanofat definition by experts. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a systematic review using PubMed and Web of Science database, retaining studies about nanofat alone. To produce consensus recommendations about nanofat, we invited experts to answer a survey about manufacturing, biological characteristics, and nomenclature of nanofat. <b>Results:</b> A review of 39 articles showed that nanofat seems to have strong regenerative potential. There were 16 studies about the clinical effectiveness of the nanofat in wound healing, aesthetic surgery, and functional disabilities. However, majority of applications lack robust clinical evidence, mainly due to the design of the clinical studies. The experts suggested that nanofat refers to lipoaspirate that benefits from a washing step, followed by emulsification (20-30 passes) with a connector size between 1.2 and 1.6 mm, and a final filtration step (pore size around 300-500 µm). <b>Conclusion:</b> Nanofat seems to have strong regenerative potentials but with a lack of robust clinical evidences. Our experts have suggested the first consensus about a definition of the nanofat that can be used by the academic societies in the coming years.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nanofat Use in Regenerative Medicine: A Systematic Literature Review and Consensus Recommendations from Expert Opinions.\",\"authors\":\"Robin Arcani, Mélanie Velier, Florence Sabatier, Stéphanie Simoncini, Maxime Abellan-Lopez, Brigitte Granel, Audrey Benyamine, Quentin Gomes de Pinho, Vincent Dani, Pietro Gentile, Guy Magalon, Sophie Menkes, Steve Sampson, Alexis Verpaele, Lucienne Vonk, Jérémy Magalon, Aurélie Daumas\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To report <i>in vitro</i>, preclinical, and clinical effectiveness of nanofat in adults undergoing reconstructive or functional surgery and to produce a series of consensus statements about nanofat definition by experts. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a systematic review using PubMed and Web of Science database, retaining studies about nanofat alone. To produce consensus recommendations about nanofat, we invited experts to answer a survey about manufacturing, biological characteristics, and nomenclature of nanofat. <b>Results:</b> A review of 39 articles showed that nanofat seems to have strong regenerative potential. There were 16 studies about the clinical effectiveness of the nanofat in wound healing, aesthetic surgery, and functional disabilities. However, majority of applications lack robust clinical evidence, mainly due to the design of the clinical studies. The experts suggested that nanofat refers to lipoaspirate that benefits from a washing step, followed by emulsification (20-30 passes) with a connector size between 1.2 and 1.6 mm, and a final filtration step (pore size around 300-500 µm). <b>Conclusion:</b> Nanofat seems to have strong regenerative potentials but with a lack of robust clinical evidences. Our experts have suggested the first consensus about a definition of the nanofat that can be used by the academic societies in the coming years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0385\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0385","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:报告纳米脂肪在成人重建或功能性手术中的体外、临床前和临床效果,并形成专家对纳米脂肪定义的一系列共识声明。方法:我们使用PubMed和Web of Science数据库进行了系统综述,保留了单独关于纳米脂肪的研究。为了产生关于纳米脂肪的一致建议,我们邀请专家回答了一项关于纳米脂肪的制造、生物学特性和命名的调查。结果:对39篇文献的回顾表明,纳米脂肪似乎具有很强的再生潜力。有16项关于纳米脂肪在伤口愈合、美容手术和功能障碍方面的临床疗效的研究。然而,大多数应用缺乏有力的临床证据,主要是由于临床研究的设计。专家们建议,纳米脂肪指的是通过洗涤步骤,然后是乳化(20-30次),连接尺寸在1.2到1.6毫米之间,最后是过滤步骤(孔径约为300-500微米)的抽脂物。结论:纳米脂肪具有较强的再生潜力,但缺乏有力的临床证据。我们的专家已经就纳米脂肪的定义提出了第一个共识,可以在未来几年被学术团体使用。
Nanofat Use in Regenerative Medicine: A Systematic Literature Review and Consensus Recommendations from Expert Opinions.
Objective: To report in vitro, preclinical, and clinical effectiveness of nanofat in adults undergoing reconstructive or functional surgery and to produce a series of consensus statements about nanofat definition by experts. Methods: We conducted a systematic review using PubMed and Web of Science database, retaining studies about nanofat alone. To produce consensus recommendations about nanofat, we invited experts to answer a survey about manufacturing, biological characteristics, and nomenclature of nanofat. Results: A review of 39 articles showed that nanofat seems to have strong regenerative potential. There were 16 studies about the clinical effectiveness of the nanofat in wound healing, aesthetic surgery, and functional disabilities. However, majority of applications lack robust clinical evidence, mainly due to the design of the clinical studies. The experts suggested that nanofat refers to lipoaspirate that benefits from a washing step, followed by emulsification (20-30 passes) with a connector size between 1.2 and 1.6 mm, and a final filtration step (pore size around 300-500 µm). Conclusion: Nanofat seems to have strong regenerative potentials but with a lack of robust clinical evidences. Our experts have suggested the first consensus about a definition of the nanofat that can be used by the academic societies in the coming years.