超声检查与FOB在烧伤合并吸入性损伤患者气道评估中的相关性:一项前瞻性观察研究。

IF 1.5 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Heena Garg, Savita Agarwal, Amit Kumar, Shailendra Kumar, Vanlal Darlong, Lokesh Kashyap, Maneesh Singhal, Shivangi Saha
{"title":"超声检查与FOB在烧伤合并吸入性损伤患者气道评估中的相关性:一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Heena Garg, Savita Agarwal, Amit Kumar, Shailendra Kumar, Vanlal Darlong, Lokesh Kashyap, Maneesh Singhal, Shivangi Saha","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim/background: </strong>Fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) is the gold standard for assessing airway involvement in burn patients but is invasive. Ultrasound (USG) has not been previously used to evaluate the airway in burn patients. Our study evaluated the feasibility of using USG to assess airway involvement in inhalational burn injury and correlated its efficacy with FOB.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective observational study was conducted in the burns intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care hospital. Bedside airway USG was performed to evaluate vocal cord (VC) width for edema and other airway parameters, including tongue thickness, pre-epiglottis space depth, inter-arytenoid distance, epiglottis-to-midpoint of VC, distance between the true VCs, distance between the false VCs, tracheal wall thickness, and tracheal air column width. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy was then performed to assess airway involvement, and findings were correlated with USG at the VC level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 51 patients were included. Airway USG assessment was able to predict the VC edema, correlating with FOB findings in 30 patients. Ultrasound showed a sensitivity and specificity of 85.2 and 81.3%, respectively, with a positive and negative predictive value of 90.9 and 72.2%, respectively, for assessing airway edema at the level of VC. The mean right and left VC widths were 21.15 ± 9.52 mm and 22.03 ± 9.52 mm, respectively, in patients with VC edema. The pre-epiglottis space in patients with (<i>n</i> = 33) vs without VC edema (<i>n</i> = 18) was found to be statistically significant (14.5± 5.64 mm vs 10.87 ± 4.36 mm; <i>p</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound can be used as a reliable, non-invasive bedside predictor of airway involvement in patients with suspected inhalational injury.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Garg H, Agarwal S, Kumar A, Kumar S, Darlong V, Kashyap L, <i>et al</i>. Correlation of Ultrasound Examination with FOB for Airway Assessment in Burn Patients with Inhalational Injury: A Prospective Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(4):314-319.</p>","PeriodicalId":47664,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"29 4","pages":"314-319"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation of Ultrasound Examination with FOB for Airway Assessment in Burn Patients with Inhalational Injury: A Prospective Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Heena Garg, Savita Agarwal, Amit Kumar, Shailendra Kumar, Vanlal Darlong, Lokesh Kashyap, Maneesh Singhal, Shivangi Saha\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim/background: </strong>Fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) is the gold standard for assessing airway involvement in burn patients but is invasive. Ultrasound (USG) has not been previously used to evaluate the airway in burn patients. Our study evaluated the feasibility of using USG to assess airway involvement in inhalational burn injury and correlated its efficacy with FOB.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective observational study was conducted in the burns intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care hospital. Bedside airway USG was performed to evaluate vocal cord (VC) width for edema and other airway parameters, including tongue thickness, pre-epiglottis space depth, inter-arytenoid distance, epiglottis-to-midpoint of VC, distance between the true VCs, distance between the false VCs, tracheal wall thickness, and tracheal air column width. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy was then performed to assess airway involvement, and findings were correlated with USG at the VC level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 51 patients were included. Airway USG assessment was able to predict the VC edema, correlating with FOB findings in 30 patients. Ultrasound showed a sensitivity and specificity of 85.2 and 81.3%, respectively, with a positive and negative predictive value of 90.9 and 72.2%, respectively, for assessing airway edema at the level of VC. The mean right and left VC widths were 21.15 ± 9.52 mm and 22.03 ± 9.52 mm, respectively, in patients with VC edema. The pre-epiglottis space in patients with (<i>n</i> = 33) vs without VC edema (<i>n</i> = 18) was found to be statistically significant (14.5± 5.64 mm vs 10.87 ± 4.36 mm; <i>p</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound can be used as a reliable, non-invasive bedside predictor of airway involvement in patients with suspected inhalational injury.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Garg H, Agarwal S, Kumar A, Kumar S, Darlong V, Kashyap L, <i>et al</i>. Correlation of Ultrasound Examination with FOB for Airway Assessment in Burn Patients with Inhalational Injury: A Prospective Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(4):314-319.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\"29 4\",\"pages\":\"314-319\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045054/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24936\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的/背景:纤维支气管镜检查(FOB)是评估烧伤患者气道受累的金标准,但具有侵入性。超声(USG)以前未用于评估烧伤患者的气道。我们的研究评估了使用USG评估吸入性烧伤气道受损伤的可行性,并将其疗效与FOB进行了比较。材料和方法:本前瞻性观察性研究在一家三级医院的烧伤重症监护病房(ICU)进行。采用床边气道USG评估声带(VC)水肿宽度及其他气道参数,包括舌厚、会厌前间隙深度、杓间距离、会厌至VC中点、真VC间距离、假VC间距离、气管壁厚度、气管气柱宽度。然后进行纤维支气管镜检查以评估气道受累情况,结果与VC水平的USG相关。结果:共纳入51例患者。气道USG评估能够预测VC水肿,与30例患者的FOB结果相关。超声在VC水平评估气道水肿的敏感性和特异性分别为85.2和81.3%,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为90.9和72.2%。肺泡水肿患者左、右肺泡平均宽度分别为21.15±9.52 mm和22.03±9.52 mm。有VC水肿(n = 33)与无VC水肿(n = 18)的会厌前间隙差异有统计学意义(14.5±5.64 mm vs 10.87±4.36 mm;P = 0.02)。结论:超声可作为怀疑吸入性损伤患者气道受累的可靠、无创床边预测指标。Garg H, Agarwal S, Kumar A, Kumar S, Darlong V, Kashyap L,等。超声检查与FOB在烧伤合并吸入性损伤患者气道评估中的相关性:一项前瞻性观察研究。中华检验医学杂志,2015;29(4):314-319。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correlation of Ultrasound Examination with FOB for Airway Assessment in Burn Patients with Inhalational Injury: A Prospective Observational Study.

Aim/background: Fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) is the gold standard for assessing airway involvement in burn patients but is invasive. Ultrasound (USG) has not been previously used to evaluate the airway in burn patients. Our study evaluated the feasibility of using USG to assess airway involvement in inhalational burn injury and correlated its efficacy with FOB.

Materials and methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in the burns intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care hospital. Bedside airway USG was performed to evaluate vocal cord (VC) width for edema and other airway parameters, including tongue thickness, pre-epiglottis space depth, inter-arytenoid distance, epiglottis-to-midpoint of VC, distance between the true VCs, distance between the false VCs, tracheal wall thickness, and tracheal air column width. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy was then performed to assess airway involvement, and findings were correlated with USG at the VC level.

Results: About 51 patients were included. Airway USG assessment was able to predict the VC edema, correlating with FOB findings in 30 patients. Ultrasound showed a sensitivity and specificity of 85.2 and 81.3%, respectively, with a positive and negative predictive value of 90.9 and 72.2%, respectively, for assessing airway edema at the level of VC. The mean right and left VC widths were 21.15 ± 9.52 mm and 22.03 ± 9.52 mm, respectively, in patients with VC edema. The pre-epiglottis space in patients with (n = 33) vs without VC edema (n = 18) was found to be statistically significant (14.5± 5.64 mm vs 10.87 ± 4.36 mm; p = 0.02).

Conclusion: Ultrasound can be used as a reliable, non-invasive bedside predictor of airway involvement in patients with suspected inhalational injury.

How to cite this article: Garg H, Agarwal S, Kumar A, Kumar S, Darlong V, Kashyap L, et al. Correlation of Ultrasound Examination with FOB for Airway Assessment in Burn Patients with Inhalational Injury: A Prospective Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(4):314-319.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine (ISSN 0972-5229) is specialty periodical published under the auspices of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Journal encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the fields of critical and emergency medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信